Who would be a bigger threat: Thor vs. Superman

Started by Robtard40 pages

If H1 can't figure out how to fix his crappy phone, you can quote his low-balling nonsense posts via the quick quote function still.

Originally posted by h1a8
Its possible for Cap to be able to use magic.
Its possible for Loki to have access to magical energy objects.

I can go on and on. Only an idiot would think you have to prove such things in a fictional universe.

In that case, It's also possible that Loki used magic to weaken Thor enough to make him vulnerable to being stabbed by his dagger. thus being stabbed by Loki isn't proof that Thor can be hurt by bullets.

So, prove your claims in regards to Thor being injured by bullets.

Originally posted by Silent Master
In that case, It's also possible that Loki used magic to weaken Thor enough to make him vulnerable to being stabbed by his dagger. thus being stabbed by Loki isn't proof that Thor can be hurt by bullets.

So, prove your claims in regards to Thor being injured by bullets.


I don't think anyone here would believe that.

Thor doesn't get aircraft bulletproof ability without evidence supporting it.

Originally posted by Robtard
If H1 can't figure out how to fix his crappy phone, you can quote his low-balling nonsense posts via the quick quote function still.

The definition of lowballing is using low end feats as evidence when contradictory higher than end feats exist.

You are using the word out of context.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think anyone here would believe that.

Thor doesn't get aircraft bulletproof ability without evidence supporting .

Evidence like having the durability so survive the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes without dying?

eg Thor was virtually undamaged in his fight with Hulk.

But bullets will now harm him :0

Originally posted by FrothByte
Evidence like having the durability so survive the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes without dying?

Heat resistant (possibly radiation too) feat. Doesnt apply here.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think anyone here would believe that.

Thor doesn't get aircraft bulletproof ability without evidence supporting it.

Just like nobody believes your claim that Loki created glowing objects during that scene and then never used them again.

Thor has plenty of durability feats that are greater aircraft bullets.

Originally posted by h1a8
Heat resistant (possibly radiation too) feat. Doesnt apply here.

The movie stated full force, not "heat only". but even without that feat, Thor has plenty of others that are far greater than an aircraft bullet.

Originally posted by h1a8
Heat resistant (possibly radiation too) feat. Doesnt apply here.

Proof that Thor is probably resistant to aircraft bullets:
1. Loki was shown to be bulletproof, even got shot in the face without injury
2. Sif took a shotgun blast to the hip without injury
3. Thor took a repulsor blast point blank to the face and completely shrugged it off
4. Thor is shown to be more durable than IM's armor, an armor that have withstood tank shells
5. Thor tanked the bifrost explosion
6. Thor survived the Sokovia explosion without injury
7. An Asgardian farmer easily crumpled a tactical knife in his hand without injury
8. Thor was able to withstand the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes

Proof that Thor can be penetrated by human made artillery:
1......

Originally posted by Robtard
eg Thor was virtually undamaged in his fight with Hulk.

But bullets will now harm him :0

Hulk bust his nose with a single punch and caused Thor to bleed.
There are different levels of bullets.
Watch demolition range against the 1in steel plate or the homemade armor. Some bullets won't make a scratch, others will, and other will go through.

I accept that Thor is resistant to some bullets, not all though.

Guess how much pressure a hypodermic needle tip gives if someone uses just 10lb of force?

Over 1200 tons per square inch.

Hulk doesnt even punch with 1200 tons of force on average (which would be lower than 600 tons per square inch).

You still haven't proven that Thor will be injured by aircraft bullets.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Proof that Thor is probably resistant to aircraft bullets:
1. Loki was shown to be bulletproof, even got shot in the face without injury
2. Sif took a shotgun blast to the hip without injury
3. Thor took a repulsor blast point blank to the face and completely shrugged it off
4. Thor is shown to be more durable than IM's armor, an armor that have withstood tank shells
5. Thor tanked the bifrost explosion
6. Thor survived the Sokovia explosion without injury
7. An Asgardian farmer easily crumpled a tactical knife in his hand without injury
8. Thor was able to withstand the full force of a neutron star for a few minutes

Proof that Thor can be penetrated by human made artillery:
1......


Make sure you understand the argument before joining in.
It's about aircraft bullets, not any bullet.

Characters dont share feats due to the high and low showing inconsistency.

The bifrost explosion doesnt prove that aircraft bullets will bounce off him.
The Sokovia explosion doesn't either (it was more of a break apart). IM withstood it too.

The asgardian didn't crumple a knife. You are using the wrong word. And that feat doesn't prove it either.

The heat of a star has nothing to do with being bulletproof.

You claimed that Thor could be injured by aircraft bullet, thus the burden is on you. stop trying to shift the burden.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You claimed that Thor could be injured by aircraft bullet, thus the burden is on you. stop trying to shift the burden.

He has no feats that say otherwise. That's the proof.

You lying about Thor's feats isn't proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
Hulk bust his nose with a single punch and caused Thor to bleed.
There are different levels of bullets.
Watch demolition range against the 1in steel plate or the homemade armor. Some bullets won't make a scratch, others will, and other will go through.

I accept that Thor is resistant to some bullets, not all though.

Guess how much pressure a hypodermic needle tip gives if someone uses just 10lb of force?

Over 1200 tons per square inch.

Hulk doesnt even punch with 1200 tons of force on average (which would be lower than 600 tons per square inch).

^ Example of low-balling. Using Thor's very minor nosebleed against a punch from Hulk as Thor's peak, while ignoring that he was uninjured by far greater

Sidenote: Also low-balling a punch from the Hulk

Originally posted by Silent Master
You lying about Thor's feats isn't proof.

No I'm not.
Don't take my word for it. Ask any physicist. I'll even give you a website to butt load of them. You can PM then and they will respond. Give them the feats you think makes Thor resistant against aircraft bullets. Show the clips if they haven’t seen the movie.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Example of low-balling. Using Thor's very minor nosebleed against a punch from Hulk as Thor's peak, while ignoring that he was uninjured by far greater

Sidenote: Also low-balling a punch from the Hulk


Ok, show me Thor getting punched in the nose by something greater without any damage.

I didn't lowball Hulk's punch. It wasn't 1200 tons of force, thats for sure.

See, you're back to trolling by purposely making your posts unquotable.

It's quotable