Who would be a bigger threat: Thor vs. Superman

You're a liar, the post where you responded to me isn't quotable.

See, you can't be trusted.

Both posts are quotable. I just tried.

Originally posted by h1a8
Ok, show me Thor getting punched in the nose by something greater without any damage.

I didn't lowball Hulk's punch. It wasn't 1200 tons of force, thats for sure.

Thor's fight against Hulk in Ragnarok:

-Thor was hit with the hammer hard enough to splinter his shield into bits and then send him flying.
-Hulk kicked Thor hard enough to send him flying into the wall, creating a small crater.
-Hulk grabbed Thor and repeatedly smashed him into the ground, literally into the ground creating more craters.
-Thor was jumped on, hammer-fist to the face repeatedly.

Thor was seemingly okay from all that. Your silly low-balling points have been countered once again. Now do your thing.

YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u40lpOr07Vo

Edit: I'm assuming you've actually seen the film?

You're a liar, as I just tried and it didn't work and low and behold. if you look, you can see that you used the crappy apostrophe in the word "haven’t".

See, I copy and posted the word "haven’t" directly from your post and now this post can't be quoted.

Originally posted by Robtard
Pfft, DCU Superman hands down; not even a contest.

Look at what he did to Smallville and he was trying to save people. Unleashed/bloodlusted, he would destroy the planet as Wayne warned.

Batman vs Superman, the real Rampage.

Because their cities were pretty much leveled on their watch.

Ok, here is a trick to quote-unquotable posts on KMC because of them using third world country symbols.

On the bottom right of their posts just click the quick quote button and you should be able to quote them. You can also copy that code and paste it on a regular reply. After that you can hit preview and then alter it further.

Originally posted by h1a8
Make sure you understand the argument before joining in.
It's about aircraft bullets, not any bullet.

Characters dont share feats due to the high and low showing inconsistency.

The bifrost explosion doesnt prove that aircraft bullets will bounce off him.
The Sokovia explosion doesn't either (it was more of a break apart). IM withstood it too.

The asgardian didn't crumple a knife. You are using the wrong word. And that feat doesn't prove it either.

The heat of a star has nothing to do with being bulletproof.

Like I said, there are already multiple feats to indicate Thor can withstand aircraft bullets (as he's tanked far stronger attacks) whereas you still haven't proven that aircraft bullets can pierce him.

Originally posted by Robtard
Thor's fight against Hulk in Ragnarok:

-Thor was hit with the hammer hard enough to splinter his shield into bits and then send him flying.
-Hulk kicked Thor hard enough to send him flying into the wall, creating a small crater.
-Hulk grabbed Thor and repeatedly smashed him into the ground, literally into the ground creating more craters.
-Thor was jumped on, hammer-fist to the face repeatedly.

Thor was seemingly okay from all that. Your silly low-balling points have been countered once again. Now do your thing.

YouTube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u40lpOr07Vo

Edit: I'm assuming you've actually seen the film?

You told an untruth. You said Thor was uninjured by FAR GREATER. They are comparable attacks.
None of those attacks were far greater. The word, "far" makes the statement untrue.
I'll give you that he wasn't injured when hit in the face though.

If you see the punch that caused Thor's nose to bleed then you see they are comparable.

Look at 2:01
YouTube video

Originally posted by FrothByte
Like I said, there are already multiple feats to indicate Thor can withstand aircraft bullets (as he's tanked far stronger attacks) whereas you still haven't proven that aircraft bullets can pierce him.

Yet I rebutted the ones you gave.
You have no idea how powerful aircraft bullets are do you?
You keep saying far stronger attacks.
What's your basis? Do you have a science background?

Originally posted by h1a8
Yet I rebutted the ones you gave.
You have no idea how powerful aircraft bullets are do you?
You keep saying far stronger attacks.
What's your basis? Do you have a science background?

No you haven't rebutted anything. All I see is you stating your opinion but not backing it up with anything. Again I ask, do you have any proof at all that aircraft bullets can penetrate Thor or are you just pulling that out of your ass?

^ Yep.

Hes a confirmed Troll at this point. No different to Quanchi.

Originally posted by h1a8

The Sokovia explosion doesn't either (it was more of a break apart). IM withstood it too.

You know IM also withstood aircraft bullets in the first IM right?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You know IM also withstood aircraft bullets in the first IM right?

No he didnt. He had bullets holes in his suit. They went through him like a hot knife through butter.

Originally posted by FrothByte
No you haven't rebutted anything. All I see is you stating your opinion but not backing it up with anything. Again I ask, do you have any proof at all that aircraft bullets can penetrate Thor or are you just pulling that out of your ass?

Originally posted by h1a8
No he didnt. He had bullets holes in his suit. They went through him like a hot knife through butter.

If they went all the way through him (like a hot knife through butter as you put it) hed be dead. Duh.

So he took it fine. He didnt even once say ouch.

And yet Thors durability was >>> than an upgraded version of that suit. Heck Thor > an upgraded version that was further amped by 400%.

Try using logic and common sense please over your clear bias against Marvel and butthurt over Thors on screen power levels.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor has no durability feat that supports that they can’t.
Thor has been hurt by significantly less.

No he hasnt.

You must be the worst science teacher ever.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor has no durability feat that supports that they can’t.
Thor has been hurt by significantly less.

Actually you've got it backwards. Aircraft bullets have no feats to prove they can penetrate someone as durable as Thor, thus you need to provide proof for this.

There is no evidence that Thor can withstand Aircraft bullets. But come on H1!!!! He can definetly survive them. We've seen him surviving worse.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
What would you rather wrestle with, a grizzly bear, or a tiger?

Superman's speed means he can kill anyone easily. Stormbreaker is a one-shot kill weapon for everything. Thor can now quickly teleport across even galactic distances, and has the most powerful AOE attacks/durability in the two cinematic Universes. Superman has the greatest combination of purely physical powers (Strength/Speed/Flight) in either Universes.

Maybe the only difference is that Kryptonite can end Superman while Thor has gotten only more durable but Superman can heat vision you to death from a distance.

H1 is so fun to watch.