Darth Revan vs. Tulak Hord

Originally posted by AncientPower
All indications are that he is. He's strongly implied to be second only to Ragnos--

--so, in other words, he isn't? ermm

Are you saying that Ragnos is weak then?

Sadow was scared of him you know.

Hord is stated to be the greatest duelist of the VotDL Sith Lords, he's stated to be the greatest Jedi killer prior to Nadd, and he's got a depth of sorcery none of the others can compare to. Only Nadd, Ragnos, Kun and Tenebrae are his superiors.

Correction, only Ragnos and Tenebrae were his superiors.

Nadd is confirmed to have killed more Jedi and to have been a greater sorcerer. Ragnos is superior to Nadd. Kun is confirmed to be more powerful than Ragnos.

1. Where does it state that Kun was more powerful than Ragnos?

2. Killing more Jedi doesn’t mean you are more powerful. Vader killed more Jedi than Sidious, but if they battled it wouldn’t go well for Vader.

3. Having more powerful in Sith Sorcery doesn’t make him any stronger either. Darth Tenebrous didn’t train in Sith Sorcery, but that doesn’t make him weaker than King Ommin.

Nadd isn't confirmed to be a greater sorcerer. Nada goal was to become the greatest sith sorceror but nothing says he actually achieved that. Hord apparently discovered immortality or close to it, that puts him above Nadd.

Once the most powerful and dangerous of the Dark Lords of the Sith, he [Exar Kun] was responsible for the deaths of millions four millennia before the rise of the Empire.

- The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia.

Aka he was the most powerful sith lord in history, till after him.

Originally posted by Haschwalth
Once the most powerful and dangerous of the Dark Lords of the Sith, he [Exar Kun] was responsible for the deaths of millions four millennia before the rise of the Empire.

- The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia.

Aka he was the most powerful sith lord in history, till after him.

eh, that quote doesn't necessarily refer to dead sith

Tulak Hord is more powerful than Revan due to lightsaber combat, but if we were to scale them by Force power, it would seem that Revan would be stronger.

If I might add though, Darth Traya said,”If you were to face an ancient Sith Lord in combat, you would learn that we are as children playing with toys compared to the prowess of the old masters."

How can you be the most powerful duelist if you are not powerful in the Force. Since Revan was alive a at the time, she included Revan in this.

Revan’s own master is saying that he is no match for Tulak Hord in lightsaber combat.

I believe that Tulak could either keep up with Revan in the Force or be exactly the same. Tulak brought down a 350m ship from the sky using telekinesis. I don’t think that Revan was capable of doing this using his telekinesis.

Eh Kreia also thinks Revan>all so idk.

Revan’s own master is saying that he is no match for Tulak Hord in lightsaber combat.

No.

And why not Ant?

Kreia saying Hord's a better duelist than her and Meetra doesn't mean he's also better than Revan, who is also vastly greater than her and Meetra.

Kreia never says Hord is better than anyone of the era.

That is true, but compared with Revan’s dueling feats, Tulak is simply more skilled.

Kreia only says they (Kreia and Meetra) are children compared to the ancients in lightsaber combat.

We just covered that.

Oh, yes. I didn't saw Ant'sl last post.

That is true, but compared with Revan’s dueling feats, Tulak is simply more skilled.

Revan's likely killed more Sith than Hord's killed Jedi.

1. Even if that is true, it is does not matter how many a force users he has killed, it is how many he can kill.

2. Tulak has taken over hundreds of worlds and the Dromund system. Tulak probably got his fair share of kills.

3. Revan was alive at the time that force users were plentiful, the probability of fighting a Jedi or Sith in Revan’s time is much higher than in Hord’s.