Thanos w/o IG vs. Thor w/o SB

Started by Josh_Alexander42 pages
Originally posted by FrothByte
So you're saying if an attack doesn't leave any wounds or physical injuries, then said attack doesn't hurt?

Lol....Isnt that logic?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol....Isnt that logic?

No, it's not. You can't seriously be this dumb can you?

A punch in the gut won't leave any wounds or injury, doesn't mean it doesn't hurt.

Originally posted by FrothByte
No, it's not. You can't seriously be this dumb can you?

A punch in the gut won't leave any wounds or injury, doesn't mean it doesn't hurt.

Look at who you're dealing with, I got called a troll for using his logic and when I point out his double standard. his response is basically "I don't understand".

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, since he bounces back and responds immediately.

Exactly. It was a REACTION.

Was he reacting to being hurt or being tickled is the question. Going all out with the full IG makes it obvious what he was reacting to.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Exactly. It was a REACTION.

Was he reacting to being hurt or being tickled is the question. Going all out with the full IG makes it obvious what he was reacting to.

I'd say getting slammed to the ground was reaction enough.

^ Yeah that too.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You do not dictate anything you silly little loser. I used critical reasoning you do not grasp it.
We believe reasoning, but not yours.

Please use evidence to support your reasoning as if it has no evidence than it truly isn’t reasoning now is it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Since you only apply those standards when it helps your argument. nobody cares what you think. provide proof from the actual movies, not biased opinion.
What examples are you referring to?

Originally posted by FrothByte
No, it's not. You can't seriously be this dumb can you?

A punch in the gut won't leave any wounds or injury, doesn't mean it doesn't hurt.

Ironic since you earlier claimed displacing someone a further distance was irrefutable proof an attack hurting more.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Exactly. It was a REACTION.

Was he reacting to being hurt or being tickled is the question. Going all out with the full IG makes it obvious what he was reacting to.

He reacts every time he is attacked. If a fly goes near my face I will react but the fly poses no threat. The lightning was not the threat the axe was. Thor made that clear when he said Eitri is the only one in the universe capable of such a weapon as killing Thanos.

At no point did he go all out with the gauntlet save when he snapped his finger. That had a clear effect on the stones and gauntlet. Funny you ignore clear and visible evidence of the only time he used them together but instead pretend he went out all out with an energy attack. This is based off nothing but conjecture and Thor fanboyism.

Originally posted by victreebelvictr
We believe reasoning, but not yours.

Please use evidence to support your reasoning as if it has no evidence than it truly isn’t reasoning now is it.

I already explained myself quit trolling. Respond to my response do not beg for more when you cannot refute my reasoning with anything.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ironic since you earlier claimed displacing someone a further distance was irrefutable proof an attack hurting more.

How is that ironic? Nothing I said here contradicts what I said earlier.

Originally posted by FrothByte
How is that ironic? Nothing I said here contradicts what I said earlier.
You think your opinion is proof of pain level. It is not that is your opinion only. It seems to change based off whatever helps Thor. Self serving logic at its finest.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You think your opinion is proof of pain level. It is not that is your opinion only. It seems to change based off whatever helps Thor. Self serving logic at its finest.

Please quote my exact words where my stance seems to "change" as you claim it. Right now it seems you're attacking everything I say so randomly that you're not making sense anymore.

A punch to the gut being painful is not simply my opinion, it's fact. A strike strong enough to knock you down causing pain is not my opinion, it's fact.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Please quote my exact words where my stance seems to "change" as you claim it. Right now it seems you're attacking everything I say so randomly that you're not making sense anymore.

A punch to the gut being painful is not simply my opinion, it's fact. A strike strong enough to knock you down causing pain is not my opinion, it's fact.

Just as I said breaking a jaw would hurt more than punching a guy 30 feet up in the air with no lasting damage. Now it suddenly matters before since Thor knocked hulk upwards it was proof of it being more painful. Simply not true especially when discussing fictional characters who launch each other back huge distances without really hurting the other based off that alone. We go by body language and how they react not some silly he was launched 25 feet so more pain than compared to being kod right where he stood falling down not backward.

If you are ready for it the wind will not get knocked out of you. It is more effective as a cheapshot any attack since the guy is not ready for it. Ironically with a cheapshot Thor does not budge Thanos with a weapon in the intro of the film.

Originally posted by FrothByte
No, it's not. You can't seriously be this dumb can you?

A punch in the gut won't leave any wounds or injury, doesn't mean it doesn't hurt.

You cant be this blind...Oh wait, you can when Thor is concerned.

Thanos made no expression of being hurt. Your attempts to circle arround the evidnce is futile Froth.

Please go watch IW.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Look at who you're dealing with, I got called a troll for using his logic and when I point out his double standard. his response is basically "I don't understand".

Says who exactly? 😂

The only thing serious in you boy is your attempts to protect Froth's and Darth's doom claim.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Just as I said breaking a jaw would hurt more than punching a guy 30 feet up in the air with no lasting damage. Now it suddenly matters before since Thor knocked hulk upwards it was proof of it being more painful. Simply not true especially when discussing fictional characters who launch each other back huge distances without really hurting the other based off that alone. We go by body language and how they react not some silly he was launched 25 feet so more pain than compared to being kod right where he stood falling down not backward.

If you are ready for it the wind will not get knocked out of you. It is more effective as a cheapshot any attack since the guy is not ready for it. Ironically with a cheapshot Thor does not budge Thanos with a weapon in the intro of the film.

Except Thanos never broke Hulk's jaw with a single punch now did he? And Hulk was pretty groggy after getting lightning-punched by Thor, or did you choose to ignore that as well.

I asked you before to show me a single punch from Thanos delivered to Hulk's face that hurt Hulk more than Thor's lightning-punch... I'm still waiting. You talk big but when it comes time for you to back yourself up with proof... you run away.

I also still don't see where I supposedly contradict myself.

/\

See what I mean?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You cant be this blind...Oh wait, you can when Thor is concerned.

Thanos made no expression of being hurt. Your attempts to circle arround the evidnce is futile Froth.

Please go watch IW.

Look at you try to dance around my question. I ask again, are you saying a gut punch does not cause pain simply because it leaves no wound or injury?