EMP
Re: Re: Re: Virtue signalling a term used by the far right to try and shame morality.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Does anyone here, aside from DMB, have an issue with this?
I actually don't have a problem with it.
A decent part of Jesus's ministry was spent calling out the Pharisees for virtue signaling. He even told a parable where he was calling out the person praying to God spending the entire prayer virtue signaling about how much better they are than everyone else.
The Hunchback of Notre Dame actually had a decent characterization of that with Frollo.
Just because I'm a Christian doesn't mean I'm going to speak out in the defense of the behavior of all Christians, or the Church, when they do something I disagree with on a principle level.
DAD
Re: Re: Re: Virtue signalling a term used by the far right to try and shame morality.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I'd say some truth to what you say, they are a counter-culture, but more like Oi or the British Skinhead movement than Hippies because the Rightist youth have been indoctrinated with an old trick, they been given folk devils to hate. As a result, their morality has been subverted, and compassion is seen as weak. Political correctness isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than the opposite, it's an agreement of basic moral boundaries replacing the codes of religion at the basic level. Thou shalt not call someone a ******, not because you'll go to hell but because the collectively accepted rules of the culture say it's wrong. Except, the kids are told you can say what you want; this, is counter to societies hidden socialisation anyway - as from the moment we are old enough we are told calling people names etc. is wrong, for obvious reasons. But if you hammer home the idea someone is below you, someone is out to get you; someone is stupid, stupid people will believe it. The Rhetoric of these kids is different to the counterculture inspired by young people finding they had freedom and money for the first time. This is more like Moseley or Enoch Powell, even dare I say it, like the Hitler youth for these people, they've been told up is down, and bad is good.
I can't really disagree with you so you make a good argument.
The difference between these anti-PC people and the hippies:
The hippies were preaching a message of individual choice, love, and peace.
The anti-PC peeps are preaching a message of "let me hate and stop trying to silence my hate."
Both are about freedom, yes. But one is hate and one is love.
Since I'm a filthy hippie, can't say I resonate with the people who want to use the n-word and not get sanctioned for it.
SAM
Re: Re: Re: Re: Virtue signalling a term used by the far right to try and shame morality.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Both are about freedom, yes. But one is hate and one is love.
True freedom for all means freedom for the hateful to be hateful.
Even though I consider myself liberal and easy going, I do find some of my beliefs about where society should go stray into Orwellian territory at times, which gives me a chuckle and then I'm right back to being easy going. It's fun finding out where the edges are.
DAD
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Virtue signalling a term used by the far right to try and shame morality.
Originally posted by samhain
True freedom for all means freedom for the hateful to be hateful.
I agree and I hold that position. But that is not what the Hippies were after.