Deadshot vs Bullseye vs Tilda (aim contest)

Originally posted by h1a8
Buulesyes margin of effort is extremely large (more than several inches in most cases). He does not hit something that requires accuracy to the nearest millimeter.

Bullseye's feats being less superman than Deadshots' in regards to your 'margin of error/accuracy' claim does not mean his ability ceases to be superhuman in of itself. What he can consistently do with virtually any thrown object is superman, because a normal person can't realistically do it in the manner he does.

eg A character lifting 5,000lbs doesn't cease to be superhuman because another character lifted 20,000lbs

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
This.

As mentioned in my initial OP post, [B]all three have displayed inhuman aim/accuracy at various points in their respective outings.

But now, instead of people debating in the spirit I originally intended, you end up with people pulling blatant lowball BS, in some cases outright stating that feats that are clearly impossible by real life standards aren't.

This is actually how I view it:
In terms of long range shooting and traditional marksmanship - Deadshot.
In terms of overall versatility and lethality with a variety of objects - Bullseye.
In terms of performing feats that are just flat-out BS physics breaking - Tilda.

I feel like each has an area that they are strongest in. [/B]

My bad, I fed into it as well.

Yeah, agreed. Though I'm rusty in Tilda's feats, why I didn't comment on her.

Originally posted by Robtard
Bullseye's feats being less superman than Deadshots' in regards to your 'margin of error/accuracy' claim does not mean his ability ceases to be superhuman in of itself. What he can consistently do with virtually any thrown object is superman, because a normal person can't realistically do it in the manner he does.

eg A character lifting 5,000lbs doesn't cease to be superhuman because another character lifted 20,000lbs

Nothing Bullseye did IN TERMS OF ACCURACY was superhuman. What he did in terms of generating large speeds with objects is superhuman.

It's already been explained to you, you simple do not want to listen to reason.

Originally posted by h1a8
Nothing Bullseye did IN TERMS OF ACCURACY was superhuman. What he did in terms of generating large speeds with objects is superhuman.

Prove it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it.

He hit objects that had sizes more than inches.
Even humans (like Greg Maddox) has hit something to the nearest inch multiple times from approximately 20 yds away.

Originally posted by h1a8
He hit objects that had sizes more than inches.
Even humans (like Greg Maddox) has hit something to the nearest inch multiple times from approximately 20 yds away.

I see, you're basically claiming that Bullseye didn't hit his targets exactly where he was aiming.

Prove it.

So accurately hitting people in the face with objects from a distance while not looking and throwing behind you isnt Superhuman. BS

Deadshot couldnt do that

Originally posted by tkitna
So accurately hitting people in the face with objects from a distance while not looking and throwing behind you isnt Superhuman. BS

Deadshot couldnt do that

Nope not superhuman, especially sine the head is a huge target. I imagine a human could do it if
1. Sufficient training
2. Talent
3. Chance

Originally posted by Robtard
My bad, I fed into it as well.

Yeah, agreed. Though I'm rusty in Tilda's feats, why I didn't comment on her.

Honestly, you've been a lot more objective here than most, so thanks for that. I do genuinely appreciate it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I see, you're basically claiming that Bullseye didn't hit his targets exactly where he was aiming.

Prove it.

His targets were fairly large. So hitting them wasn't humanly impossible.

Deadshot is lethal to 4000m is due to his weapon of choice right? For instance, if he was getting a bag of groceries, it's not like he can kill anyone within a 4000m radius at the drop of a hat if he didn't have his weapon.

Give the other two the same weapons, would they have a similar kill radius?

Originally posted by h1a8
His targets were fairly large. So hitting them wasn't humanly impossible.

Size of the target only matters if you're claiming that Bullseye didn't hit the specific spot on the target he was aiming at.

So, prove it.

Originally posted by gauntlet o doom
Deadshot is lethal to 4000m is due to his weapon of choice right? For instance, if he was getting a bag of groceries, it's not like he can kill anyone within a 4000m radius at the drop of a hat if he didn't have his weapon.

Give the other two the same weapons, would they have a similar kill radius?

That grocery comment has made me picture Deadshot running around, pot-shotting people with a potato cannon or something.

Originally posted by h1a8
Nope not superhuman, especially sine the head is a huge target. I imagine a human could do it if
1. Sufficient training
2. Talent
3. Chance

Then your a fool. How does somebody train at picking up objects and throwing them behind them while walking away and hitting a target (not stationary mind you)? You cant and thats why its Superhuman. Take chance out of the equation since Bullseye has done it more than once and he never missed.

So, H1 is now trying to basically imply that Bullseye showing the ability to hit things he isn't looking at on multiple different occasions, with multiple different objects, is partly down to dumb luck or "chance"?

I am starting to think this guy hasn't watched DD s3 at all, and just lightly skimmed some of the clips posted here (emphasis on lightly).

Originally posted by h1a8
Nope not superhuman, especially sine the head is a huge target. I imagine a human could do it if
1. Sufficient training
2. Talent
3. Chance

Just like a human could do replicate Deathshot's feats if
1. Sufficient training
2. Talent
3. Chance

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
So, H1 is now trying to basically imply that Bullseye showing the ability to hit things he isn't looking at on multiple different occasions, with multiple different objects, is partly down to dumb luck or "chance"?

I am starting to think this guy hasn't watched DD s3 at all, and just lightly skimmed some of the clips posted here (emphasis on lightly).

Speaking of this: Remember Alphas? They had one character who has a remarkable resemblance to Poindexter's background.

"Cameron Hicks – A former Marine with the superhuman ability of "hyperkinesis", which allows his brain to process movement at a much faster rate than others. This gives him amazing athletic feats of timing, superhuman reflexes and perfect accuracy with firearms or thrown objects and also allows him, for example, to predict trajectory by eyesight. However, he cannot always do it when under stress, making his abilities unreliable. In the first episode he is found to have an abnormal growth in his brain. He is found by the team working in a supermarket after they find video of him as a child pitching a perfect baseball game."
Wiki

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller

I am starting to think this guy hasn't watched DD s3 at all, and just lightly skimmed some of the clips posted here (emphasis on lightly).

Thats exactly correct. He just saw the DC character and went full on retard mode as usual.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like a human could do replicate Deathshot's feats if
1. Sufficient training
2. Talent
3. Chance

No amount of training, talent, or chance what make human able to do the demonstration feat by Deadshot.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
So, H1 is now trying to basically imply that Bullseye showing the ability to hit things he isn't looking at on multiple different occasions, with multiple different objects, is partly down to dumb luck or "chance"?

I am starting to think this guy hasn't watched DD s3 at all, and just lightly skimmed some of the clips posted here (emphasis on lightly).

Mostly skill through training and then some to talent. Chance plays a role to a certain degree of accuracy.

Bottomline. Bullseye did do anything a human couldn't do in terms of accuracy. Some things would be highly improbable, but certainly not impossible.

Originally posted by tkitna
Then your a fool. How does somebody train at picking up objects and throwing them behind them while walking away and hitting a target (not stationary mind you)? You cant and thats why its Superhuman. Take chance out of the equation since Bullseye has done it more than once and he never missed.

BS. Anyone can hit an object by throwing it behind them. There is nothing impossible about it. Nothing. You are an idiot if you really believe that it is.
The feat is impossible in the real world (in terms of accuracy). I gave the reasons why? Well confirmed laws of Quantum mechanics would be violated mostly.