Deadshot vs Bullseye vs Tilda (aim contest)

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
@ the idiot who still hasn't learned to use the correct quote aka H1:

The OP question and argument has always been the same. You just tried to twist it to suit your personal narrative, like you usually do.

And there you go again. "I believe", "could have". What you personally believe is not evidence, no matter how much you say it is. No one here is under any obligation to consider what you personally believe as fact, especially when you never, ever do anyone else that same courtesy. How you can continue to be such a massive hypocrite in every thread you post and not realise it truly boggles the mind.

So, you can state what you personally think people could replicate with enough training all you want. You can speculate what you personally think Bullseye did offscreen all you want. Until you actually prove any of it, none of it holds any weight here.

You claim that what Bulleye did, in terms of accuracy, is impossible. I disagreed by giving you that I believe in the contrary. The onus is on you to prove that my belief is wrong.

Originally posted by h1a8
Post the feat.

Watch the show. You've got Netflix or a streaming service.

Originally posted by KingD19
Watch the show. You've got Netflix or a streaming service.

Here is H1 claiming that nothing Bullseye has done strikes him as being impossible. Yet he has provided zero evidence to support that opinion.

Originally posted by h1a8
So bullseye can throw random objects, so accurate, that they hit their mark with less than 1mm margin of error? And he can do that multiple times in a row?

Nothing bullseye did strikes me as impossible.

And what gun feat by bullseye is at least half as impressive as Deadshot's multiple bullet in the same hole feat?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Here is H1 claiming that nothing Bullseye has done strikes him as being impossible. Yet he has provided zero evidence to support that opinion.

I actually remembered that this isn't the first time he pulled this kind of crap in a thread involving Deadshot. I recall a Deadshot vs Wesley Gibson thread from way back where he also did his "what Deadshot did was totally impossible" shtick (which, to be fair, is true). But, at the same time, claimed that Wanted-style bullet curve shooting was possible in RL. But, once again, conveniently only under certain conditions no human could actually achieve. And I know why he does this. It's an attempt to dodge the burden of proof by going, "oh well, this qualifier I added can't be proven, so I don't have to prove my claim".

Originally posted by h1a8
Post the feat.

Proving H1 hasent seen the show, but is arguing regardless.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
It's an attempt to dodge the burden of proof by going, "oh well, this qualifier I added can't be proven, so I don't have to prove my claim".

He never has proven anything in any thread. He always lays the burden of proof on the opposition and after numerous people actually do but he disagrees anyways, he considers that a personal victory for himself. Its sad.

Originally posted by h1a8
You claim that what Bulleye did, in terms of accuracy, is impossible. I disagreed by giving you that I believe in the contrary. The onus is on you to prove that my belief is wrong.

Since no human being has yet to replicate the feats thay Bullseye has done, the onus is on you to prove your stance if you believe it's possible.

Lol at h1 asking us to prove his beliefs wrong.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Lol at h1 asking us to prove his beliefs wrong.

Gotta admit, that was Bert gif worthy lol.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Lol at h1 asking us to prove his beliefs wrong.

The initial claim was Bulleyes did impossible accuracy throws.
I stated I don't believe this.
Therefore the onus is on the claim maker to prove his case.

If I did believe in the claim then there is no need to prove anything.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
I actually remembered that this isn't the first time he pulled this kind of crap in a thread involving Deadshot. I recall a Deadshot vs Wesley Gibson thread from way back where he also did his "what Deadshot did was totally impossible" shtick (which, to be fair, is true). But, at the same time, claimed that Wanted-style bullet curve shooting was possible in RL. But, once again, conveniently only under certain conditions no human could actually achieve. And I know why he does this. It's an attempt to dodge the burden of proof by going, "oh well, this qualifier I added can't be proven, so I don't have to prove my claim".

Bullet curving is possible, just not humanly possible.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Here is H1 claiming that nothing Bullseye has done strikes him as being impossible. Yet he has provided zero evidence to support that opinion.

So you purposely troll by ignoring every other post of me claiming that Bulleyes did do impossible throws but, in terms of accuracy, these throws were not impossible.

In other words, Bullseye did not have impossible accuracy.

Originally posted by h1a8
The initial claim was Bulleyes did impossible accuracy throws.
I stated I don't believe this.
Therefore the onus is on the claim maker to prove his case.

If I did believe in the claim then there is no need to prove anything.

And if you didnt believe a man could fly, would we need to prove that to you as well?

Everyone (except you), can see with their own eyes what Bullseye did was humanly impossible.

So if you want to believe its possible, then its down to you, but its for you prove your own personal beliefs, if you wish to challenge everyone else on that.

What he displayed was laughably superior to Deadshot, who simply had good aim when firing a gun.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And if you didnt believe a man could fly, would we need to prove that to you as well?

Everyone (except you), can see with their own eyes what Bullseye did was humanly impossible.

So if you want to believe its possible, then its down to you, but its for you prove your own personal beliefs, if you wish to challenge everyone else on that.

What he displayed was laughably superior to Deadshot, who simply had good aim when firing a gun.

I agree that what Bulleyes did was humanly impossible. That's not my argument though. Do you know what my argument is?

Originally posted by h1a8
Congratulations, you found the one post out of many where I forgot to insert, "in terms of accuracy". Yet you lied and stated that I Keep claiming that Bullseye did nothing impossible.

So you purposely troll by ignoring every other post of me claiming that Bulleyes did do impossible throws but, in terms of accuracy, these throws were not impossible.

In other words, Bullseye did not have impossible accuracy.

That was from page 3, otherwise known as the original claim.

Originally posted by h1a8
I agree that what Bulleyes did was humanly impossible. That's not my argument though. Do you know what my argument is?

Your argument is that you want DS to win, thus all feats should be interpreted in the way you want.

Originally posted by h1a8
I agree that what Bulleyes did was humanly impossible. That's not my argument though. Do you know what my argument is?

Agree with whom? Nobody with eyes and any sense agrees to that.

Your argument is that what Deadshot did was not humanly possible but what Bullseye did was.

Im calling BS on that.

Bullseye was wayyyyy more impressive than Deadshot. Like not even comparable IMO.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Does anyone think Punisher could be included in this contest? At least in a gun fight..

I remember when he shot Daredevil in the exact right spot to put him down in the fight but not to be lethal.

In a Vs match, he could conceivably beat either opponent as he's a total badass, especially in the right conditions.

But from a targeting/super-human point, he's far more 'regular' than these players.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Agree with whom? Nobody with eyes and any sense agrees to that.

Your argument is that what Deadshot did was not humanly possible but what Bullseye did was.

Im calling BS on that.

Bullseye was wayyyyy more impressive than Deadshot. Like not even comparable IMO.

Both DS and BE did impossible shit. But Bullseyes didn't do anything impossible as far as accuracy (hitting his target). Bullseye feats were humanly impossible due to the velocity he produced from the thrown objects. No human can throw those objects with those velocities.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your argument is that you want DS to win, thus all feats should be interpreted in the way you want.

You still haven't proven that Bullseye's feats could be replicated in terms of accuracy.