Deadshot vs Bullseye vs Tilda (aim contest)

Started by FrothByte13 pages
Originally posted by h1a8
DS wins regardless of what I want.
No entity in real life can do what he did in terms of accuracy (human or not).

Neither can Bullseye's feats can be replicated. The difference is, Bullseye did them in the middle of a fight against active opponents.

Leave it to H1 to side with the least impressive character out of the bunch.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Neither can Bullseye's feats can be replicated. The difference is, Bullseye did them in the middle of a fight against active opponents.

The accuracy part of Bullseye's feats can be replicated by human.
Just the accuracy part only.

Originally posted by tkitna
Leave it to H1 to side with the least impressive character out of the bunch.

You think so because you are an idiot. Facts!

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still haven't proven that Bullseye's feats could be replicated in terms of accuracy.

I don't have to prove it. It's common sense. Bullseye didn't hit any target a human would not be capable of hitting. Greg Maddox many times have thrown consecutive pitches that were accurate to the nearest inch.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't have to prove it. It's common sense. Bullseye didn't hit any target a human would not be capable of hitting. Greg Maddox many times have thrown consecutive pitches that were accurate to the nearest inch.

Calling your claim common sense does not relieve you of your burden of proof. Now, start providing proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't have to prove it. It's common sense. Bullseye didn't hit any target a human would not be capable of hitting. Greg Maddox many times have thrown consecutive pitches that were accurate to the nearest inch.

At the same distance everytime, with the same object everytime, at the same stationary object everytime. A major league pitcher is a horrible example, but expected from you.

Show us any human grabbing different objects and throwing them with accuracy at different targets while moving in different directions frontwords and backwords.

You cant because its not humanly possible.

Originally posted by h1a8
You think so because you are an idiot. Facts!

Lmao.

When no one is supporting Deadshot over Bullseye here except you, you should really question who is factually an idiot.

I also see that he has resorted to his last resort tactic. After several pages of bullshit, and he has yet to produce a single source, link etc. to back his claims, he falls back to his "Hurdur, common sense" routine that he has used countless times before, under the same circumstances. It's his lazy way to try and shift any burden of proof off himself. But no one falls for it anymore, because we have seen him pull the same stunt too many times already.

Yeah, besides the fact that everyone elses common sense suggests the exact opposite.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Lmao.

When no one is supporting Deadshot over Bullseye here except you, you should really question who is factually an idiot.

There are only a few (if that) supporting Bullseye over DS.
What makes one an idiot is when I explain why DS feat was absolutely impossible (for any entity) in terms of accuracy and they still think Bullseye is more impressive.

Originally posted by tkitna
At the same distance everytime, with the same object everytime, at the same stationary object everytime. A major league pitcher is a horrible example, but expected from you.

Show us any human grabbing different objects and throwing them with accuracy at different targets while moving in different directions frontwords and backwords.

You cant because its not humanly possible.

Each throw, a human can replicate in terms of accuracy. It's not like Bullseye had to be accurate to the nearest inch. A face is huge, the globe is huge, a chest is huge, etc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Calling your claim common sense does not relieve you of your burden of proof. Now, start providing proof.

Having to prove common sense things to someone means that the someone is pretty stupid or is trolling. Either means the debate is a waste of time with them.

Again, Calling your claim common sense does not relieve you of your burden of proof. Now, start providing proof.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, Calling your claim common sense does not relieve you of your burden of proof. Now, start providing proof.

It depends on whether it is indeed common sense. It is in this case.

Originally posted by h1a8
It depends on whether it is indeed common sense. It is in this case.

Like usual, you're wrong.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Like usual, you're wrong.
Im not.
To argue common sense things means that someone is deficient or trolling. And if that's the case then there is no need to argue with them in the first place.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Like usual, you're wrong.

Originally posted by h1a8
There are only a few (if that) supporting Bullseye over DS.
What makes one an idiot is when I explain why DS feat was absolutely impossible (for any entity) in terms of accuracy and they still think Bullseye is more impressive.

Because Bullseye Feats were massively more impressive. Its been explained to you why over and over, but your DC Bias does not allow you to see sense or just to even use basic common sense.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Because Bullseye Feats were massively more impressive. Its been explained to you why over and over, but your DC Bias does not allow you to see sense or just to even use basic common sense.
NOT IN TERMS OF ACCURACY.
A face, globe, chest, are huge ass targets. A little kid can throw a random object and hit those targets.

Bullseye feats are impressive because of the velocity he can throw shit with. His accuracy is impressive too but not impossible. Even if his accuracy was impossible then it is magnitudes less than DS feat.

Prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8

Each throw, a human can replicate in terms of accuracy. It's not like Bullseye had to be accurate to the nearest inch. A face is huge, the globe is huge, a chest is huge, etc.