Who would be more handicapped?

Started by Prof. T.C McAbe3 pages

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Good thing they weren't These Ninjas.

[/B]

I don't think so. Here he has his HF and relies on it during a fight because he knows he will win, maybe even faster if he goes full offense and 0 defense. Without his HF he would adapt and fight differently.

Wolverine, since he'd either die from the Adamantium poisoning or by cutting his radial artery when erecting his claws.

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
I don't think so. Here he has his HF and relies on it during a fight because he knows he will win, maybe even faster if he goes full offense and 0 defense. Without his HF he would adapt and fight differently.

Don't feed the troll.

It's not even an actual panel, just an alternate cover. From deviantart.

HFless Logan took out ninjas just fine, his damage soak is still beastly, comparable to that of the Punisher.

And, of course, he has showings when they failed to tag him even once.

Sure looks like those Ninjas took Little Jimmy by Surprise.

Re: Who would be more handicapped?

Originally posted by gauntlet o doom
Thor without Mjolnir

Wolverine without healing factor

Batman without detective/science knowledge

Easy Answer. Thor without Mjolnir. Just look at classic Thor and unworthy Thor.