Originally posted by HP LegendYou are welcome bud! 😄
Nah seriously I'm no better than you.Also thanks for motivating me to change my avatar and signature. It really needed it.
But you are definitely a better debater than me, I just like to leave my opinion and a little reasoning.
Sometimes a little counter too. 🙂
Originally posted by victreebelvictr
You are welcome bud! 😄But you are definitely a better debater than me, I just like to leave my opinion and a little reasoning.
Sometimes a little counter too. 🙂
I'm not a better debater than you. Granted I don't have a very high opinion of myself but still I just geniunally don't think I'm any better than you. Most of my debating in my eyes has been subpar/mediorce since I got here. Give me one thread where I debated better than you. I'm very much an average debater. We're no different.
Originally posted by HP Legendhttp://www.killermovies.com/forums/f86/t657635.html
I'm not a better debater than you. Granted I don't have a very high opinion of myself but still I just geniunally don't think I'm any better than you. Most of my debating in my eyes has been subpar/mediorce since I got here. Give me one thread where I debated better than you. I'm very much an average debater. We're no different.
Remember this little beauty?
Originally posted by victreebelvictr
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f86/t657635.htmlRemember this little beauty?
Can hardly be classed as a debate lol. You didn't specifically argue a postion there it was mostly just discussing the validity of Khem's Tulak can solo armies statements (which as far as I'm concerned don't exist as of now because I didn't find any after further inspection eg: checking Ant's RT) which is subjective. I took Khem to be a biased source whereas you didn't and we had a genaral discussion. I wouldn't call it a propere debate where you particularly tried TBH.
Q
Originally posted by HP LegendBut you can tell that you were more skillful than I was in formatting an opinion. 😬
Can hardly be classed as a debate lol. You didn't specifically argue a postion there it was mostly just discussing the validity of Khem's Tulak can solo armies statements (which as far as I'm concerned don't exist as of now because I didn't find any after further inspection eg: checking Ant's RT) which is subjective. I took Khem to be a biased source whereas you didn't and we had a genaral discussion. I wouldn't call it a propere debate where you particularly tried TBH.