IW Thor vs. General Zod

Started by h1a86 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Normal lighting lasts 30 microseconds, Thor's lasts for seconds. which means it imparts around 100,000 times the energy of a normal strike.

Why do you always have to lowball Thor?


Good Ole Silent. Don't actually debate the topic but lurk around nitpicking arguments against Thor and Marvel characters. I have not once seen you debate against someone while you are supporting a DC character against a marvel character. Is it fair to say that you are bias towards marvel?

With that said
That's was my argument remember. So you accept it now instead of his lightning is magically more powerful than regular lightning?

But that has nothing to do with what we see onscreen. Thor's lightning has literally hit Materials without disintegrating them. It has no heat feats better than slicing an I-beam with a swipe.

But not to lowball and give lightning the benefit of the doubt Both lightning and HV are comparable since it takes many times the melting point of steel to melt it in one swipe.

I'm pointing out that you don't apply your own standards when it makes Thor look good. so again, why do you downplay Thor so much?

Says the guy that has claimed that guys like Batman are both faster and more skilled than what is shown onscreen, again. why the doublestandards?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm pointing out that you don't apply your own standards when it makes Thor look good. so again, why do you downplay Thor so much?

Says the guy that has claimed that guys like Batman are both faster and more skilled than what is shown onscreen, again. why the doublestandards?

I was going by feats. Comparing HV to lightning.

What does your last statement have to do with anything?

Yes, it has to do with your double-standards.

Now, do you agree to never again claim that a characters skill/abilities are greater than what is shown onscreen?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, it has to do with your double-standards.

Now, do you agree to never again claim that a characters skill/abilities are greater than what is shown onscreen?

What are you talking about? We use visual speed remember? Been doing that forever now.

And I don't see what that has to do with this thread.

Now, do you agree to never again claim that a characters skill/abilities are greater than what is shown onscreen?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Now, do you agree to never again claim that a characters skill/abilities are greater than what is shown onscreen?

Do you agree to stop trolling?
Do you agree to stop lurking and waiting to nitpick arguments instead of initiating one and have others scrutinize it?

Debating standards are very relevant to a debate, which means my question is on topic and not trolling

Originally posted by Silent Master
Now, do you agree to never again claim that a characters skill/abilities are greater than what is shown onscreen?
Originally posted by h1a8
Do you agree to stop trolling?
Do you agree to stop lurking and waiting to nitpick arguments instead of initiating one and have others scrutinize it?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Debating standards are very relevant to a debate, which means my question is on topic and not trolling

Thor destroys him.