Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilSo the reason why Shayne survived is solved, Good.
Actually there is if you read the comic like i told you toRead what Alpheus said..
"No Shayne, You believed in this league enough to survive the rest of my multiverse collapsing"
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
No, there isn't, there is no objective standard or measurement that is immutable.
Halo is considered by many a masterpiece. Yet some don't like it. Final Fantasy is the most popular RPG ever. Yet some people hate it.All you can say is YOU think it's better because of A, B or C.
Acting, directing, writing, special effects, costume design etc. are all capable of being objectively judged. What you prefer and what's good or bad isn't the same thing.
Return of the Jedi is my favourite Star Wars movie, but I know that Empire Strikes Back is the superior movie. Why? Because it's objectively better made.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So the reason why Shayne survived is solved, Good.
Then where are the proofs of your claims about WFs multiverse being destroyed is due to Superman interrupting the process of replacing multiverse?
READ the comic! Superman punched the forger and in the process, a chain effect happened that prevented the forgers creation from overwriting the mainstream multiverse, That's it. Superman didn't actually "destroy the multiverse along with the 6th dimension". He just merely knocked down a domino and the rest started to fall. The editor made this clear for simple minded human beings to comprehend this.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Acting, directing, writing, special effects, costume design etc. are all capable of being objectively judged. What you prefer and what's good or bad isn't the same thing.Return of the Jedi is my favourite Star Wars movie, but I know that Empire Strikes Back is the superior movie. Why? Because it's objectively better made.
Still wrong, you’re ALWAYS going to reach an area where it becomes subjective.
READ the comic! Superman punched the forger and in the process, a chain effect happened that prevented the forgers creation from overwriting the mainstream multiverse, That's it. Superman didn't actually "destroy the multiverse along with the 6th dimension". He just merely knocked down a domino and the rest started to fall. The editor made this clear for simple minded human beings to comprehend this.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Just to point out though that Marino was only posting on his personal account, where his thoughts are his own and not those of DC...So we can't really use that, as it becomes circular - you disagree with what Snyder thinks, a supporter of that feat would disagree with what Marino thinks etc etc...
All we have to go on is what is on panel, not what they may say in a Twitter or whatever.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
READ the comic! Superman punched the forger and in the process, a chain effect happened that prevented the forgers creation from overwriting the mainstream multiverse, That's it. Superman didn't actually "destroy the multiverse along with the 6th dimension". He just merely knocked down a domino and the rest started to fall. The editor made this clear for simple minded human beings to comprehend this.Still wrong, you’re ALWAYS going to reach an area where it becomes subjective.
No it isn't. And even if it was, it would still only be partially subjective, so you'd still be wrong either way.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Wait, what?Really? You never told us that, I think?
You think Richard Marquand was a mere puppet or you believe he contributed a lot?
I'm sure i've said so before in "top x movies lists" and such. And I defend the ewoks any chance i get.
Marquand... I think that while I can't underestimate his contribution as Lucas was at the height of his burnout, it's still true that Lucas was there over his shoulder, giving him nudges in certain directions. So i think it's a bit of both, tbh. Marquand was allowed to do the work, but only to a point.
Originally posted by -Pr-
No it isn't. And even if it was, it would still only be partially subjective, so you'd still be wrong either way.I'm sure i've said so before in "top x movies lists" and such. And I defend the ewoks any chance i get.
Marquand... I think that while I can't underestimate his contribution as Lucas was at the height of his burnout, it's still true that Lucas was there over his shoulder, giving him nudges in certain directions. So i think it's a bit of both, tbh. Marquand was allowed to do the work, but only to a point.
Yes, it is. You're EXTREMELY wrong. "There are objective measurements of quality in TV shows as in most things."
that's all based on taste. How do you define quality acting? People think that Brie Larsen sucks at acting, yet she won an Oscar for acting. So are all the people that thinks she sucks wrong?
You're not making any sense here.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Alberto, Lets get this straight.You and I both have read the comics and you knew that weve already debated this multiple times.so dont act like only you read them
This is the process you keep talking about
https://comicvine1.cbsistatic.com/uploads/original/11141/111418571/7364105-1451186449-ZXN7u.jpg
https://comicvine1.cbsistatic.com/uploads/original/11141/111418571/7364106-7509366228-jN0ET.jpg
No where it stated WFs multiverse would be destroyed if the process got interrupted. The comics only stated he could replace main multiverse with his multiverse.
And this multiverse is very stable
"Those that might last, I usher toward reality, those I deem unstable, I return to the forge"
https://i.ibb.co/vwTm76x/928602f3d7ca7bcb5dd8026cb0096b63f724a85f.jpg
This multiverse was so completed it even had it own hypertime
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-20?id=152191#12
And WF(who also created the main multiverse) even called this multiverse is his masterpiece
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-21?id=152935#12
He even already wrote all rules of this reality
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-24?id=155457#20
And talking about editorSo I ask again Alberto. Do you have any unambiguous statement to support your claims?
😂 I'll tear your entire post in a few, patience young one.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Yes, it is. You're EXTREMELY wrong. "There are objective measurements of quality in TV shows as in most things."that's all based on taste. How do you define quality acting? People think that Brie Larsen sucks at acting, yet she won an Oscar for acting. So are all the people that thinks she sucks wrong?
You're not making any sense here.
You can define them just fine. There are plenty of examples of things that are objectively good and bad in the creation of movies and tv.
I'm not saying personal taste doesn't come in to it. Of course it does. But objectively, Lord of the Rings is a superior film to say, The Room. You can objectively measure tons of things.
So no, you're wrong.
Originally posted by -Pr-
You can define them just fine. There are plenty of examples of things that are objectively good and bad in the creation of movies and tv.I'm not saying personal taste doesn't come in to it. Of course it does. But objectively, Lord of the Rings is a superior film to say, The Room. You can objectively measure tons of things.
So no, you're wrong.
he put himself in a corner and keeps moving the goalpost. i wouldnt press it
Originally posted by xJLxKing
He posted on another site
He is waiting for someone to respond there so he can copy/paste
😂 let me know when you find it
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Alberto, Lets get this straight.You and I both have read the comics and you knew that weve already debated this multiple times.so dont act like only you read them
This is the process you keep talking about
https://comicvine1.cbsistatic.com/uploads/original/11141/111418571/7364105-1451186449-ZXN7u.jpg
https://comicvine1.cbsistatic.com/uploads/original/11141/111418571/7364106-7509366228-jN0ET.jpg
No where it stated WFs multiverse would be destroyed if the process got interrupted. The comics only stated he could replace main multiverse with his multiverse.
And this multiverse is very stable
"Those that might last, I usher toward reality, those I deem unstable, I return to the forge"
https://i.ibb.co/vwTm76x/928602f3d7ca7bcb5dd8026cb0096b63f724a85f.jpg
This multiverse was so completed it even had it own hypertime
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-20?id=152191#12
And WF(who also created the main multiverse) even called this multiverse is his masterpiece
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-21?id=152935#12
He even already wrote all rules of this reality
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Justice-League-2018/Issue-24?id=155457#20
And talking about editorSo I ask again Alberto. Do you have any unambiguous statement to support your claims?
Anyways, this doesn't prove a thing. Destroying a Weapon/Tool That can Create/Destroy a Multiverse doesn't put one in that Tier. IF Reed Richards destroys THE Ultimate Nullifier that can destroy realities it doesn't mean Reed can destroy a Reality. Same goes For Captain Mar-vell who destroyed a Cosmic Cube, period.
Originally posted by -Pr-
You can define them just fine. There are plenty of examples of things that are objectively good and bad in the creation of movies and tv.I'm not saying personal taste doesn't come in to it. Of course it does. But objectively, Lord of the Rings is a superior film to say, The Room. You can objectively measure tons of things.
So no, you're wrong.
Yeah, no you can't, and no it doesn't. There's ZERO way to prove it, too many opinions skewer THAT logic, period. You haven't made a single point yet
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilSo you dont have any unambiguous proof to rebut my point or support your claims?Good to know
Anyways, this doesn't prove a thing. Destroying a Weapon/Tool That can Create/Destroy a Multiverse doesn't put one in that Tier. IF Reed Richards destroys THE Ultimate Nullifier that can destroy realities it doesn't mean Reed can destroy a Reality. Same goes For Captain Mar-vell who destroyed a Cosmic Cube, period.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 I'll tear your entire post in a few, patience young one.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
😂 let me know when you find itAnyways, this doesn't prove a thing. Destroying a Weapon/Tool That can Create/Destroy a Multiverse doesn't put one in that Tier. IF Reed Richards destroys THE Ultimate Nullifier that can destroy realities it doesn't mean Reed can destroy a Reality. Same goes For Captain Mar-vell who destroyed a Cosmic Cube, period.
Yeah, no you can't, and no it doesn't. There's ZERO way to prove it, too many opinions skewer THAT logic, period. You haven't made a single point yet
I really was expecting some long post with couple scans or something
Did the other site not give any rebuttal yet? :lol;
