Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
I was replying to Phil, Quan I Am.For example what? Street Fighters are below Marvel's street tier, pun intended.
What street could beat them? Take Ken for example. Which marvel street could beat him for the majority?
Originally posted by Philosophía
I had a "he was laughing at my post not yours, you dirty dog killing wench" but I didn't hit submit.Now I regret it.
Next time go balls deep and don't pull out. I'd respect you more.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusLocally (i.e. at short enough distances), the event horizon doesn't affect an object in any way. If we assume that the falling observer is in a box so that he cannot see the outside world, i.e. he can only make local observations within the box, he wouldn't even notice when he crosses the horizon. He'd be in free-fall and thus his space-time would be locally Minkowskian just as if he was sitting in an empty space, in accordance with Einstein's equivalence principle.
Thank you, but I think we're getting in the weeds, I'm simply addressing this as a durability feat. Usually, event horizon = very bad, for black holes.In this particular issue, the Event Horizon is implied to be the danger zone. And Jon's black hole gun forced the event horizon to expel and repel matter. That implies that if the planet crossed the event horizon, it would be bad. Probably crushed. Or perhaps lost if we assume the black hole is big enough that the planet would cross intact, but then, is it a durability feat anymore?
What is the significance of crossing the event horizon if the black hole is in-fact small? Does it become even more intense?
The event horizon signifies a boundary beyond which there is no return. Once an object has crossed it, the space-time has become so "warped" that all of the object's possible futures (i.e. its every possible future world-line) end up in the singularity.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusIm not an expert at science. But didnt Jon dive into the black hole and directly feed singularity with his black hole gun? Iow, He already inside the event horizon
Thank you, but I think we're getting in the weeds, I'm simply addressing this as a durability feat. Usually, event horizon = very bad, for black holes.In this particular issue, the Event Horizon is implied to be the danger zone. And Jon's black hole gun forced the event horizon to expel and repel matter. That implies that if the planet crossed the event horizon, it would be bad. Probably crushed. Or perhaps lost if we assume the black hole is big enough that the planet would cross intact, but then, is it a durability feat anymore?
What is the significance of crossing the event horizon if the black hole is in-fact small? Does it become even more intense?
But I like your explanation, because this becomes a much cooler feat:
https://i.imgur.com/cQ2XIHD.jpg
Originally posted by xJLxKingjon’s gun causes the blackhole to “throw up”.
I interpreted that scene as Jon about to get pulled into the Black Hole but he fired a gun. Reasons being that there is a black more closer to the Black Hole that hasn’t been destroyed yetThat said, it’s comics
First panel he and the planet both in the event horizon. That’s why the aren’t visible. Then you see the flash, either the gun, or the energy exploding out of the blackhole.
Jon had to be closer to the singularity than the planet because otherwise he could miss and shoot the planet instead. A singularity can have billions of solar mass but could be the size of an atom.
Originally posted by Enzeru
That's not true.I assume you're referring to "Thor: For Asgard", which doesn't really strike me as canon in the first place. Besides that they talk about it was fate and destiny for them to give life to Thor. Odin didn't rape her, because he wanted a son. He had sex with her to get through with it and fulfill their fate and destiny. To Gaea it was more about principle as it sounded.
But in canon comics Gaea herself tells Thor that she is a fertility goddess, who has birthed many children. She also tells him how she met Odin, how they both fell in love and that Thor was the result of that love.
You could make the argument, that she was lying to Thor in order to protect him, but eh. Odin didn't rape her in canon comics. He kindaaa raped her in the non-canon comic, but there he did it, because Thor was their fate and destiny.And in the actual mythology... oh boy, Odin was one hell of a rapey son of a biatch – almost as bad as Zeus.
I stand corrected.
Thor: For Asgard has gotten its own designation number (sometimes it takes a good while), so it's indeed non-canon.
Ikaris almost kills Thanos but he can't be killed as Death rejects Thanos.
😏
Originally posted by abhilegend
Ikaris almost kills Thanos but he can't be killed as Death rejects Thanos.😏
Like a low rent Lobo.
Originally posted by cdtm
Honestly, there's a lot of ways to "kill" an immortal.The Soul Gem is an easy and readily available method in Marvel. Just suck up the soul, wallah no soul to reject.
Some immortal beings have no souls... and the gem can still fail if it's not backed up by the rest of the gems and the gauntlet... and it needs a competent user, too.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Ikaris almost kills Thanos but he can't be killed as Death rejects Thanos.😏
PIS
