Originally posted by -Pr-👆
The same stance I've had for like, ten years now. That an interview can be used as supplementary evidence to reinforce a panel, but can't be used to contradict it because the panel is god.I mean, I can put it in the rules thread, and I don't think any of the other mods would disagree with me, but I thought we all had an understanding.
If the interview cements/details what was actually shown in the comic itself, without contradicting anything, then it should be usable as supplementary evidence.
However, interviews in and of themselves cannot be used to contradict/alter/retcon published material or preexisting continuity. That's not how it works in this medium.