Comic Book Questions & Discussion

Started by -Pr-1,926 pages
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
and people are limited by the agency of their environment. Look at Alan Turing and Rua Paul.

Are yous saying that the DCU superhero teams don't want queer members?

Historically speaking, super-groups tend to have all straight members, because historically speaking superheros are straight. No one bats an eyelash at this.

Even when Extrano appeared the character was not really welcome in and out of DC and was used more as goofy comedic relief. People will say "but a lot has changed since 1988", which is has, but also hasn't.

Originally posted by Robtard
Historically speaking, super-groups tend to have all straight members, because historically speaking superheros are straight. No one bats an eyelash at this.

Even when Extrano appeared the character was not really welcome in and out of DC and was used more as goofy comedic relief. People will say "but a lot has changed since 1988", which is has, but also hasn't.

I don't think that's an unfair point.

My argument is that the only way acceptance is going to happen is if the characters are allowed to integrate properly with established characters. It's how you establish any new character.

You have to write them well too, sure, and given Marvel and DC of late that's a big ask, but it's a start imo.

I agree with you there regarding proper integration and a need for good writing and character development of said not-straight characters.

But I also think people are freaking out over the JLQ, when it's really nothing much to freak out over. I doubt it will even survive, likely be a very short series.

Originally posted by Robtard
I agree with you there regarding proper integration and a need for good writing and character development of said not-straight characters.

But I also think people are freaking out over the JLQ, when it's really nothing much to freak out over. I doubt it will even survive, likely be a very short series.

This. It won't survive because it's forced and inorganic

when will dc and marvel realize comic readers are not the same group of the woke culture kids, comic nerds are much older from the millennium generation

I honestly feel even I can make a better story than some writers now in DC.

At least I will do fan-service, like this

Yes, nudity for beautiful women is not good. But it is feast for the eyes

Would it be valid if there was a Justice League African American?

Originally posted by Robtard
I agree with you there regarding proper integration and a need for good writing and character development of said not-straight characters.

But I also think people are freaking out over the JLQ, when it's really nothing much to freak out over. I doubt it will even survive, likely be a very short series.

I'm going to refer to what Sin says here:

Originally posted by Sin I AM
This. It won't survive because it's forced and inorganic

Agreed... which will only hurt the inclusion of queer characters in future.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
I honestly feel even I can make a better story than some writers now in DC.

At least I will do fan-service, like this

Yes, nudity for beautiful women is not good. But it is feast for the eyes

You could take a shit on a typewriter and drop it out of a plane on to the doorstop of their offices and it would be better than a lot of the stuff they put out.

Originally posted by Bentley
Would it be valid if there was a Justice League African American?

ahout as valid as justice league monkeys, justice league chimpanzees, justice league apes, justice league joggers

Originally posted by MrMind
ahout as valid as justice league monkeys, justice league chimpanzees, justice league apes, justice league joggers

Nope. Even for this forum that's pretty ****ing racist.

Originally posted by Robtard
But I also think people are freaking out over the JLQ, when it's really nothing much to freak out over. I doubt it will even survive, likely be a very short series.

This. It's not like it's replacing the JLA, it's just another run. If it sells it will continue, if it doesn't it will be cancelled.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Are yous saying that the DCU superhero teams don't want queer members?
I'm saying times change. It's also not aimed at normalising adults perceptions of homosexuality. It's saying to the kids "gays can be heroes too."

Originally posted by Astner
Why did sexual identity blow up like it did? The soap opera drama was always the shittiest part of comics, "Oh no, M.J. spent the night in Harry's apartment," like who gives a shit? We all know how this is going to end.

I can't be the only one who reads these books for characters in funny costumes beating the shit out of each other.

👆 are they going to concentrate on who is hooking up with who? Their lifestyle? Or them fighting the big bad guys? I read comics for the action and the superhero mythology not who they are dating.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I'm saying times change. It's also not aimed at normalising adults perceptions of homosexuality. It's saying to the kids "gays can be heroes too."

I didn't argue that it wasn't. I was arguing that it's a piss-poor, borderline insulting way of doing it.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I'm saying times change. It's also not aimed at normalising adults perceptions of homosexuality. It's saying to the kids "gays can be heroes too."

miss the old days when, "everyone can be a hero" was a thing and not just specific groups who was never excluded in the first place. people*ahem* companies*sic* who specifically mentions a group kinda cheapens it in my perspective.

In the what if world where Uatu never interfered against Galactus, both Thing and human torch beat Surfer (Thing with a cheapshot, Torch straight up)

😂

"Fly through supernovas" lol

Another example figureless statements tend to be shit