Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Galan Let me ask you a legit question. Cuz you seem to believe this idiocy, but I actually respect your intelligence and willingness to change your mind when presented with new info. Clark actually did **** all the the WF himself. All this hype is about breaking an object. What do you know of steel making? It's relevant.when you make a steel sword, you pour it into a crucible and beat it into shape on an anvil. An anvil is pig iron. Crucibles are made of different materials depending on the size. But neither crucible nor anvil are as strong as steel. Point being, this logic is based on a logical fallacy that since the forge creates multiverses, that it requires multiversal powers to break it. Or to put it in comic terms, it's like saying you can break adamantium because you can destroy the material it's forged in. It's not true. It's not correct. And that's what this whole idiotic ****ing belief is based on. A logical fallacy 🤷🏿‍♂️
if I poured water on an important server in Google offices and crash Google services in the western hemisphere, am I global? Or did I just pull a linchpin that cascaded into far more damage? Sorry but that's what happened and if you stop fanning, you'd realize it. When something depends on one piece holding it together, you can absolutely destroy it by destroying that linchpin without using the necessary force to required to directly destroy the whole.
I mean, First you using real life logic to explaining an object that is 6th-dimensional object and it containing a multiverse
Second, you using a Marvel comics object as example even though those two objects haven't any relation.
For short, you using two different domains and trying to downplay this feat. The comics never mentioned or even implied Superman destroys WF's multiverse was less impressive due to he only destroys his anvil
It's like this dude bypassed all the pertinent points. He destroyed the forge. Not the multiverse. Destroying the forge caused the collapse of the multiverse and it still does not mean destroying the forge is multiversal. I LITERALLY just gave you a precise example of how damaging an integral piece can cascade into far greater damage.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvilEven though we saw was after superman punched WF and this punch shockwave destroys WF's Multiverse, And this multiverse is a fully developed/realized multiverse. Again, Prove that supes destroying/collapsing multiverse was less impressive. Did comics mention it? No the entire storyline never mentioned or even implied your theory
It's like this dude bypassed all the pertinent points. He destroyed the forge. Not the multiverse. Destroying the forge caused the collapse of the multiverse and it still does not mean destroying the forge is multiversal. I LITERALLY just gave you a precise example of how damaging an integral piece can cascade into far greater damage.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
Even though we saw was after superman punched WF and this punch shockwave destroys WF's Multiverse, And this multiverse is a fully developed/realized multiverse. Again, Prove that supes destroying/collapsing multiverse was less impressive. Did comics mention it? No the entire storyline never mentioned or even implied your theory
Except , it seems clear that none of it was real yet (,it was a dark multiverse style universe, they seemed to be easy to destroy), as the World Forger explicitly hadn't made it real yet, that's what he was trying to do with the anvil.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Galan Let me ask you a legit question. Cuz you seem to believe this idiocy, but I actually respect your intelligence and willingness to change your mind when presented with new info. Clark actually did **** all the the WF himself. All this hype is about breaking an object. What do you know of steel making? It's relevant.when you make a steel sword, you pour it into a crucible and beat it into shape on an anvil. An anvil is pig iron. Crucibles are made of different materials depending on the size. But neither crucible nor anvil are as strong as steel. Point being, this logic is based on a logical fallacy that since the forge creates multiverses, that it requires multiversal powers to break it. Or to put it in comic terms, it's like saying you can break adamantium because you can destroy the material it's forged in. It's not true. It's not correct. And that's what this whole idiotic ****ing belief is based on. A logical fallacy 🤷🏿‍♂️
if I poured water on an important server in Google offices and crash Google services in the western hemisphere, am I global? Or did I just pull a linchpin that cascaded into far more damage? Sorry but that's what happened and if you stop fanning, you'd realize it. When something depends on one piece holding it together, you can absolutely destroy it by destroying that linchpin without using the necessary force to required to directly destroy the whole.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Except , it seems clear that none of it was real yet (,it was a dark multiverse style universe, they seemed to be easy to destroy), as the World Forger explicitly hadn't made it real yet, that's what he was trying to do with the anvil.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
It's like this dude bypassed all the pertinent points. He destroyed the forge. Not the multiverse. Destroying the forge caused the collapse of the multiverse and it still does not mean destroying the forge is multiversal. I LITERALLY just gave you a precise example of how damaging an integral piece can cascade into far greater damage.
Now I agree with this. Said this beforehand. Anyways, it's like saying, Prime ripping Monarch suit is equal to destroying the Universe. It was a weapon used to achieved a result. Someone did say that the anvil was the multiverse so if this was said, I do concede.
Originally posted by AlbertoJohnAvil
Except , it seems clear that none of it was real yet (,it was a dark multiverse style universe, they seemed to be easy to destroy), as the World Forger explicitly hadn't made it real yet, that's what he was trying to do with the anvil.
😕
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
This is what I mean.All the questioning for DC events, but none for Marvel.
I do question Marvel events though. When people was saying Thanos endured the full scream from Black Bolt, I provided nothing but scans proving the opposite. When people were saying Thor knocked Nul out, I was there to deny it. I've debated against every single character. Lol... you must've forgotten why Insane Titan cant stand me. It started with my previous hate towards Thanos. I've debated against Blue Marvel. It's like people forget these things. It was me that was trying to debunk Thanos beating the amped bug.
@Carv Well, I've never personally seen you as a marvelboy or anything like that. A gamma fangirl? Sure, but not a marvel zombie.
But there's certainly always a lot more of mental gymnastics against DC feats than Marvel ones, and you seem to contribute to it quite often. Or it was that way before I left, anyway lol.
Your goal to me has always looked like 'how can Hulk's dick look a little bit less tiny?'
@Broly...
But I don't think that though. I dont think Superman ft is as good as people are portraying it just like I dont think Thor slapping a horse of Beyonders in the face is as impressive as it is either. I do disagree with Comicvine saying that the ft is continental and that it. I've never agreed with collateral damage = power output.
Also, ABHI posted a lying scan even enhance my feelings about the ft. He posted a scan saying the artist said something when in actuality, he never said that. The artist said that the scan was fake. That's terrible.