Galan007
|Quantum Observer|
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I'm sure the Skywalker twins weren't low in their count, either.It just feels like a wasted opportunity with Leia....
"So we have Luke, right? Now let's take his twin, who's actually been in battle and fought for the Rebels when Luke was still playing with his toys on some backwater shit hole, actually give her training that isn't just jumping about with an arthritic mouldy space frog on a literal swamp, decent equipment - those remote drones, that stupid bucket helmets the works - she'll be the baddest Jedi of all time!"
Oh the entire Skywalker bloodline would've all had a ridiculous midi-count. I imagine they were each
very close to Anakin's "20,000+", tbh... And I doubt the Palpatine bloodline was far behind him either.
Leia was very much wasted in canon. She literally went through 6 months of Jedi training from a n00b Luke, then just... Quit. At least Legends fleshed her out a lot more. /shrug
Originally posted by MrMind
i heard legend is better to read than current star wars is it true?
There is some excellent material in new canon(on the comic/novel side), but there's quite a bit of bad as well. Same thing with Legends, tbh. Thing is, new canon only started like 8 years ago, while Legends had been around for decades before that -- so there are a LOT more characters/stories to pull from, across every era.
Aside from that, the "canon hierarchy" in Legends was an absolute joke. Random blurbs from the back of a toy box, statements from novels, depictions in comics, commentary from the director or stunt coordinators, feats from video games, etc... They were all "canon", but some of them were *more* canon than others, so it was often hard to figure out wtf to believe.
Say what you will about new canon, but I appreciate how they've consolidated things on that front. ALL officially licensed/approved content is canon, and the most recent information takes precedence. Simple. Easy.