Poll
31%
69%
Originally posted by relentless1
Unless Thor can punch as hard as Superman then he can't really do much to Diana in a fist fight; she took two headbutts from Clark that didn't really do anything to her and he's much stronger than Thor is, plus her speed outmatches Thor easily. I think she could take this 6/10
Thats like me saying...
WW can be injured/killed by 1920's rifles bullets. Thor took the full force of a star, so WW has to hit as hard as a star to be able to harm Thor.
Originally posted by relentless1
Unless Thor can punch as hard as Superman then he can't really do much to Diana in a fist fight; she took two headbutts from Clark that didn't really do anything to her and he's much stronger than Thor is, plus her speed outmatches Thor easily. I think she could take this 6/10
Getting knocked on your ass isn't really indicative that the hits "didn't really do anything to her".
Originally posted by FrothByte
Getting knocked on your ass isn't really indicative that the hits "didn't really do anything to her".
she didn't bleed, bruise or get KOed did she?
As far as the bullets being able to harm her in Wonder Woman:
a. she was never shown to actually be vulnerable to bullets, her Amazon sisters just assumed she was so she defended herself accordingly
b. there is a power creep throughout her appearances
c. taking hits from Superman, Steppenwolf and Doomsday are much better durability showings that tanking a bullet anyways
Originally posted by relentless1
she didn't bleed, bruise or get KOed did she?As far as the bullets being able to harm her in Wonder Woman:
a. she was never shown to actually be vulnerable to bullets, her Amazon sisters just assumed she was so she defended herself accordingly
b. there is a power creep throughout her appearances
c. taking hits from Superman, Steppenwolf and Doomsday are much better durability showings that tanking a bullet anyways
Yea, her bleeding from a gunshot wound in her solo movie is totally not her being shown to be vulnerable to bullets
Originally posted by relentless1
she didn't bleed, bruise or get KOed did she?As far as the bullets being able to harm her in Wonder Woman:
a. she was never shown to actually be vulnerable to bullets, her Amazon sisters just assumed she was so she defended herself accordingly
b. there is a power creep throughout her appearances
c. taking hits from Superman, Steppenwolf and Doomsday are much better durability showings that tanking a bullet anyways
Besides, Loki cut Thor with a small blade. Both have low durability showings
Originally posted by relentless1
she didn't bleed, bruise or get KOed did she?As far as the bullets being able to harm her in Wonder Woman:
a. she was never shown to actually be vulnerable to bullets, her Amazon sisters just assumed she was so she defended herself accordingly
b. there is a power creep throughout her appearances
c. taking hits from Superman, Steppenwolf and Doomsday are much better durability showings that tanking a bullet anyways
Bleeding or getting KO'd is not the only proof that a hit affected you. Bruises normally appear only after some time has passed after getting hit.
Fact is, getting knocked down IS proof that you were affected by the hit, otherwise you would never have gotten knocked down in the first place.
In a boxing match if someone gets hit flush on the face and it knocks the fighter down, do we conclude that the hit completely didn't do anything to him simply because he was able to get back up after a 6 count?