The Great Wall Shutdown

Started by snowdragon17 pages
Originally posted by dadudemon

What cartels?

Exactly, we need to use the appropriate language like they do in Mexico, business leaders, contributors to society as job creators.

Originally posted by Surtur
I guess Ted Cruz is also disabled:

You said it. 😆

Weirdest part, Trumpers act like even if Trump admitted to it, they would have cared.

Its simply excuse the party you support, condemn the party you oppose. It cant be any more real then that.

Let's say back when Trump mocked that disabled reporter for being disable and Trump said something like "yes I did do that; he deserved it", you think Trumpers would have cared?

I would say it was wrong disabled people shouldn't be mocked. KMC isn't some bastion of righteousness just the other day yall were talking about buttfcking a young woman elected to congress.

I don't like hypocrisy.

Again, excuse the party you support, condemn the party you oppose. This cant be denied.

Its now racist to call Warren pochantas, but its not equally as racist to claim your native American when your not. Same thing for Robert Orouke

Why not have one set of values both sides sticks to instead of changing the rules when the shoe is on the other foot?

Trumpers wouldn't have cared.

Anyhow, didn't watch the Trump-Hannity interview last night as I'm not into watching two men jerk each other off, but it seems Trump mentioned that he may declare an emergency to get the funding for his vanity project and the consensus is that it's not really to get the funding, it's because the issue will then go to the courts, Trump can then reopen the government and not look like be backed down so Rush Limbaugh doesn't call him a sissyboy again.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I would say it was wrong disabled people shouldn't be mocked. KMC isn't some bastion of righteousness just the other day yall were talking about buttfcking a young woman elected to congress.

I don't like hypocrisy.

Again, excuse the party you support, condemn the party you oppose. This cant be denied.

Its now racist to call Warren pochantas, but its not equally as racist to claim your native American when your not. Same thing for Robert Orouke

Why not have one set of values both sides sticks to instead of changing the rules when the shoe is on the other foot?

Probably because each side, politicians and voters alike, see one another as "the enemy" more than ever before. The centre ground in politics is now a barren wasteland. It'd take either a break from the two party system or an impossibly outstanding person from one of the traditional parties to pull both sides towards the middle

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers wouldn't have cared.

Anyhow, didn't watch the Trump-Hannity interview last night as I'm not into watching two men jerk each other off, but it seems Trump mentioned that he may declare an emergency to get the funding for his vanity project and the consensus is that it's not really to get the funding, it's because the issue will then go to the courts, Trump can then reopen the government and not look like be backed down so Rush Limbaugh doesn't call him a sissyboy again.

Ok but most of your arguments are laced with profanity about trump, insults against "trumpers" or Trump, or Hannity.

Just in this paragraph, you're talking about two men jerking each other off, sissy boys etc.

This is how you talk but then say Trump is bad for talking like this as well.

It's hard to take seriously when you get upset that Trump "mocked a disabled reporter" when you constantly mock the other side.

If your side is morally superior, why talk worse than Trump? Why not claim the moral high ground and show you are different.

Oh, I'm not upset that Trump mocked a disabled reporter for being disabled, that type of behavior is expected out of Trump. My concern there is with Trumpers defending said poor behavior. But if focusing on a few "mean words" means you don't take me seriously and not address the topic, no worries.

But imo, you should hold the president up to a higher standard than say me on the internet.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, I'm not upset that Trump mocked a disabled reporter for being disabled, that type of behavior is expected out of Trump. My concern there is with Trumpers defending said poor behavior. But if focusing on a few "mean words" means you don't take me seriously and not address the topic, no worries.

But imo, you should hold the president up to a higher standard than say me on the internet.

Got to admit, I mock our disabled member for being a jobless, Incel gimp virgin who'll never have kids or know the touch of a woman, so, I can't have a go at trump here.

Joblessness and being an incel gimp is a choice though, as it relates here.

Originally posted by Robtard
Joblessness and being an incel gimp is a choice though, as it relates here.
he is physically disabled definately, I suspect he is also physically disgusting to the opposite sex. He may well have some kind of brain damage that keeps him permanently incoherent and triggered.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, I'm not upset that Trump mocked a disabled reporter for being disabled, that type of behavior is expected out of Trump. My concern there is with Trumpers defending said poor behavior. But if focusing on a few "mean words" means you don't take me seriously and not address the topic, no worries.

But imo, you should hold the president up to a higher standard than say me on the internet.

yes thats my point we should hold the president to a higher standard no matter who it is.

But its difficult to hear criticism from someone about something when they are basically mocking homosexual acts at the same time because he mocked a reporter.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
yes thats my point we should hold the president to a higher standard no matter who it is.

But its difficult to hear criticism from someone about something when they are basically mocking homosexual acts at the same time because he mocked a reporter.

I do.

Now I'm mocking gays? LoLz. Good one.

Anyhow, the Trump declaring an emergency so then the wall issue gets tied up in court and he can wash his hands and say "I tried!" sounds plausible. Like something an advisor told him to do to save face when kowtowing to Dems and reopening the government,

Its not a good one, it is mocking. Hell I got banned once for calling someone who is queer, a queer.

Originally posted by Robtard
Let's say back when Trump mocked that disabled reporter for being disable and Trump said something like "yes I did do that; he deserved it", you think Trumpers would have cared?

I'm not a Trumper, Trump supporter, or even a Trump-voter and I don't care. I think this is a stupid lame-ass anti-Trump talking point.

Take what you dish.

Suck it.

The end.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Its not a good one, it is mocking. Hell I got banned once for calling someone who is queer, a queer.
"Jerk each other off" was used as a figure of speech. Not that Trump and Hannity literally jerked each other off. I'm hoping you know this and are just doing your thing?

The way you said "queer" is hate-speach.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Hell I got banned once for calling someone who is queer, a queer.

I got queered once for calling banned who is someone, a someone.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm not a Trumper, Trump supporter, or even a Trump-voter and I don't care. I think this is a stupid lame-ass anti-Trump talking point.

Take what you dish.

Suck it.

The end.

The only retort I have heard is "well IM not the president."