Originally posted by Nevan
No one takes into account air resistance in calcs, because it's too complicated to account for and not worth it unless you're talking about high velocity events.Moving the rings in space is somewhat easier because there's no air resistance and other factors, but it's not unquantifiable at all.
If you were in Space you wouldn't be able to suddenly lift a building or a house sized Boulder.
All I know is that without gravity there is no weight. Moving an object would be way easier.
Also, Etri said that the rings were frozen, ergo it means that once the ice was broken the rings were free to operate. Therefore, no real way to quantify the feat.
Re: Greater feat: Thor pulling the rings vs. Superman Pulling a ship
Originally posted by carthage
In your opinion and based on the effort exerted. Which feat required more strength to exert?Clark towing a ship through ice in BVS
Vs
Thor pulling the Forge rings in Infinity war
He braced against the force necessary to break the ice. This force is unknown. For example, if the rings turn with a force of 100 tons, and yet ice is exerting 101 tons to stop the rings then Thor only needs to brace against 1 tons. Obviously it took well more than 1 ton of force. But we can't be sure how much more.
And then effort plays a role too.
Clark did it with less effort.
Originally posted by h1a8
He braced against the force necessary to break the ice. This force is unknown. For example, if the rings turn with a force of 100 tons, and yet ice is exerting 101 tons to stop the rings then Thor only needs to brace against 1 tons. Obviously it took well more than 1 ton of force. But we can't be sure how much more.And then effort plays a role too.
Clark did it with less effort.
The feat is an unknown. No real way to calculate the force exerted.
Re: Re: Greater feat: Thor pulling the rings vs. Superman Pulling a ship
Originally posted by h1a8
He braced against the force necessary to break the ice. This force is unknown. For example, if the rings turn with a force of 100 tons, and yet ice is exerting 101 tons to stop the rings then Thor only needs to brace against 1 tons. Obviously it took well more than 1 ton of force. But we can't be sure how much more.And then effort plays a role too.
Clark did it with less effort.
Wow, you really suck at science.
Re: Re: Greater feat: Thor pulling the rings vs. Superman Pulling a ship
Originally posted by h1a8
He braced against the force necessary to break the ice. This force is unknown. For example, if the rings turn with a force of 100 tons, and yet ice is exerting 101 tons to stop the rings then Thor only needs to brace against 1 tons. Obviously it took well more than 1 ton of force. But we can't be sure how much more.And then effort plays a role too.
Clark did it with less effort.
Ok this isn’t even remotely close to true.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Yes, it's massively bigger. But he couldn't put a dent in Thanos without Stormbreaker even before he had all the stones.Yet Ironman was able to make Thanos bleed eventually with 5 stones. Yet Thor was durable enough to withstand the star, strong enough move the rings and open the forge.
It doesn't make sense, or its just inconsistent showings.
Besides, Iron Man had to do an entire barrage of attacks just to scratch him, acting like they are anywhere near the same tier is dishonest.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Ok this isn’t even remotely close to true.
How can it not be true that we don't know how much force it took to break the ice?
So you are saying that we do know?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Wow, you really suck at science.
Not in this thread.
Originally posted by juggerman
😆
Originally posted by ShadowFyreHow do you confirm it was 1 ton? Should be way more than that. Stop trolling now.
1 ton confirmed. Pretty sure Cap could have just thrown a motorcycle with a rope attached to it and had the same effect.
Originally posted by HulkIsHulk
Is the star one more of a durability feat? How is it a strength feat? 😕 😮
They're talking about when Thor freed the gigantic rings that encircled there star.
As for how withstanding the full force of a star is both a strength and durability feat; you might want to Google neutron stars and what happens if something gets too close.
Originally posted by Nevan
Why is that a bad feat for Thanos instead of a good feat for Iron Man?Besides, Iron Man had to do an entire barrage of attacks just to scratch him, acting like they are anywhere near the same tier is dishonest.
Thor and Ironman are not in the same tier, current Thor could one shot Ironman.