Ozy vs Panther

Originally posted by Silent Master
I did show them not to be true, the very scene you mentioned proves that he wouldn't have been able to catch another bullet. Thus lie number one. you stated Cap was only peak human yet Cap has much better strength feats than Ozy who you claimed had superhuman strength. Thus lie number 2. you claimed they were great fighters despite not having any feats backing that up. Thus lie number 3.

Edit: no, beating up unskilled no names does not make them great fighters.

It was explained to you that wasn't the meaning of the post.
You are clearly adding words to the post to change its meaning.
At worst, you now know my intended meaning and therefore you must show that it is false.

2. I stated Ozy was superhuman. I didn't give a relation. The relation is real humans. When I stated Cap was peak human it wasn't in relation to real humans but fictionally humans. But that statement is void since I agreed that he is Superhuman (not peak human) in the MCU a long time ago. Therefore there is no lie.

3. Now you tell lies. I just provided the feats that make them great fighters. And I explained that it would be difficult for a real great fighter to achieve the same feats.

Again, nothing you have posted actually refuted any of my points.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, nothing you have posted actually refuted any of my points.

That's what you say when I'm right and you have no way of refutting me.

H1 gives amazing solid and sound argument while silent has no way of refuting. Silent just says, "nothing you have posted actually refuted any of my point ."

No, that's what I say when you fail to refute my points.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, that's what I say when you fail to refute my points.

Saying that I didn't refute your points is not proof that I didn't. Anyone can say that at anytime.

Ozy will be catching BP's fists with his face.

Originally posted by h1a8
Saying that I didn't refute your points is not proof that I didn't. Anyone can say that at anytime.

You didn't and I'll prove it, we'll take one at a time. your original claim was that he could catch bullets at point blank range and my argument is your own example proves that he can't do it.

Go ahead, refute my argument.

The Spectre Wins. 😛

Originally posted by Silent Master
You didn't and I'll prove it, we'll take one at a time. your original claim was that he could catch bullets at point blank range and my argument is your own example proves that he can't do it.

Go ahead, refute my argument.

I did. I explained the meaning of that post.
If a person caught a bullet then "them being able to catch bullets" doesn't mean they have to catch them back to back within seconds of each other. You are adding details to my post that don't exist. It just mean they have the ability to catch a bullet. Ozy can catch one today and then one tomorrow or he can just catch one today.

Originally posted by Mindset
Ozy will be catching BP's fists with his face.

If only he couldn't see the punch coming as easily as the bullet.

Originally posted by h1a8
I did. I explained the meaning of that post.
If a person caught a bullet then "them being able to catch bullets" doesn't mean they have to catch them back to back within seconds of each other. You are adding details to my post that don't exist. It just mean they have the ability to catch a bullet. Ozy can catch one today and then one tomorrow or he can just catch one today.

Yes it does, otherwise it's not an example of them catching bullets. it's two examples of them catching a bullet.

Your claim was that he could catch bullets, prove it.

Originally posted by Silent Master

3. You claimed Ozy beat two great fighters at the same time. only by feats neither of those two were actually great fighters.

Maybe try watching the film.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Maybe try watching the film.

Why, so I can confirm for the 1,000th time that they're not great fighters?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes it does, otherwise it's not an example of them catching bullets. it's two examples of them catching a bullet.

Your claim was that he could catch bullets, prove it.

If you catch two bullets one at a time then you have caught two "bullets".

I am assuming baseball players can see bullets in slow motion?

Originally posted by h1a8
If you catch two bullets one at a time then you have caught two "bullets".

I'll explain this like I would to a two year old, maybe then you'll understand. If you do 1 push-up a day for 30 days, that isn't an example of you doing 30 push-ups. it's 30 examples of you doing 1 push-up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'll explain this like I would to a two year old, maybe then you'll understand. If you do 1 push-up a day for 30 days, that isn't an example of you doing 30 push-ups. it's 30 examples of you doing 1 push-up.

But you did push-ups (plural). This is an English lesson for you.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I am assuming baseball players can see bullets in slow motion?

Originally posted by h1a8
But you did push-ups (plural). This is an English lesson for you.

Nope. They can't see bullets at all.

I like how you have to make lame excuses for cover for your lie. H1's new claim: When I said Ozy could catch bullets, I didn't actually mean he could catch more than one during a scene. I actually meant he could only catch a single bullet during a scene.

Your new claim makes you look even more dishonest, so I'm happy with it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I like how you have to make lame excuses for cover for your lie. H1's new claim: When I said Ozy could catch bullets, I didn't actually mean he could catch more than one during a scene. I actually meant he could only catch a single bullet during a scene.

Your new claim makes you look even more dishonest, so I'm happy with it.

H1's new claim: When I said Ozy could catch bullets, I didn't actually mean he could catch more than one during a scene. I actually meant he could only catch a single bullet during a scene.

Your new claim makes you look even more dishonest, so I'm happy with it.