Originally posted by Silent Master
H1's new claim: When I said Ozy could catch bullets, I didn't actually mean he could catch more than one during a scene. I actually meant he could only catch a single bullet during a scene.Your new claim makes you look even more dishonest, so I'm happy with it.
Ozy can catch bullets means he can catch at least one bullet at a time. Common sense really!
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Confused, did Ozy not catch a bullet?
His claim was that Ozy could catch bullets, as in more than one. he is now making excuses by saying that he didn't really mean multiple bullets during the same scene. he meant a single bullet on Monday and another on Tuesday for a total of 2 bullets.
Hard to tell, he was playing possum, that bullet didn't actually hurt him, he def caught it at point blank which is a good feat considering he didn't have any prep.
Could he catch a hail of bullets no? Could he catch two fired at the same time, probably not. Could he catch two bullets a few seconds fired from each other, its possible
It's not hard to tell, we go by feats and as of now Ozy has zero feats to prove he can catch multiple bullets in the same scene nor do we have any evidence that suggests it's likely that he could.
Thus h1's original claim is wrong and unless he's a moron, he knew it was wrong when he stated it, that makes it a lie.
Although I'm happy with his new claim, because it makes him look like an even bigger moron
h1 did and when I pointed out that his own proof doesn't support his stance. in an effort to save face he is trying to argue that, that wasn't what he meant by Ozy could catch bullets and I'm a idiot for not understanding that by catching bullets he meant that Ozy could catch one on Monday and another on Tuesday for a total of 2 bullets.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Hard to tell, he was playing possum, that bullet didn't actually hurt him, he def caught it at point blank which is a good feat considering he didn't have any prep.Could he catch a hail of bullets no? Could he catch two fired at the same time, probably not. Could he catch two bullets a few seconds fired from each other, its possible
Silent is lying.
I stated that Ozy can catch bullets.
What does that mean?
It means he can catch a bullet.
Common sense.
i think the problem here is simple english. when h1 said ozy's capable of catching bullets he didnt imply literarily bullets, his point was: a gun is fired, ozy can catch the bullet.
sometimes its how people speak or refer to things or just excitement. for example i and a friend havent seen BvS yet, but when i go see it, i come back telling the dude: "that movie's crazy, can you imagine supes can tank nukes" or thor can tank stars.
you see, ofcourse supes didnt get hit by more than one nuke, nor did thor tank beams from two stars. That statement just shows that a nuke is launched, supes can tank/survive it. THAT SIMPLE.
But seeing the amount of h1 haters and people who nitpick words unnecessarily instead of letting the thread progress, its no suprise silent decided to fully twist what h1 was implying, branding him a liar when silent himself knew the point being driven at.
for me its not good. if you want to point out errors in grammar, fine. But dont use it as a form of arguement.
No, the problem is that h1 is a known liar and he does it to lowball characters he doesn’t like (mostly Marvel characters, probably why you are defending him, I assume?). Ppl assume he is lying because he lies so much that it is the default position that ppl assume he would take.
Edit. He likely does it because he is a troll and he gets his jollies from ppl giving him attention. Which is why putting him on /ignore is the best recourse for most any poster in these forums.
Edit2. And we do not “hate” h1. At best he is an annoyance. We bash him because he makes it so easy to mock him and his arrogant attitude and slimey/weasely debating style makes ppl feel that he is deserving of the mockery.