Originally posted by Putinbot1
no, we aren't talking about anything vs anything, we are talking about popularly understood definitions to describe a variety of similar types of people. This is what the alt right want you to do split hairs and worry about a specific definition rather than a popularised and widely understood definition. It appeals to the autistic, Incel types, which I've never seen you as and still don't.
And this Silent Master is exactly what the far left wants people to do, blur lines and definitions so you can call right-wingers who have never said a damn white supremacist thing in their life or advocated for any policy on the basis of race, or even those who have explicitly and repeatedly denounced the alt-right and argued for individualist principle of being alt-right for holding mainstream right-wing opinions.
Does Putinbot have any evidence that the people in that video are even racist? Much less white supremacist, alt-right, or even worse neonazi? If so it's pretty weird that there are Mexican Trump supporters.
But don't expect to be able to reason in this manner with him. The dude thinks half of his fellow countrymen in the UK are fascists for supporting Brexit. You're speaking with a radical here.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
no, we aren't talking about anything vs anything, we are talking about popularly understood definitions to describe a variety of similar types of people. This is what the alt right want you to do split hairs and worry about a specific definition rather than a popularised and widely understood definition. It appeals to the autistic, Incel types, which I've never seen you as and still don't.
Tell me Putinbot, being consistent with your own logic, you hate incels correct?
Why should I split hairs between you and someone who would actively go out and murder incels?
You can surprise and impress me by admitting your logic doesn't hold, surprise me more and disgust me by suggesting it would be a good thing to kill incels, or not surprise me at all by not addressing the obvious hole in your logic and just moving forward assuming it holds.