What happens when you wear a Nazi armband to a Trump-rally?

Started by Putinbot17 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, that's what you're trying to turn the conversation into. what you're talking about now only appears in your posts in this thread.
No, no it doesn't.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Wow dude, it's like you don't know the difference between racist and Nazi.
Unless you think one is better then the other, your complaint is meaningless.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Unless you think one is better then the other, your complaint is meaningless.
Exactly!

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Unless you think one is better then the other, your complaint is meaningless.

Nazis are several orders of magnitude worse than regular racists.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nazis are several orders of magnitude worse than regular racists.
Depends if you see one as better than the other as stated previously. For you, your complaint has meaning.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nazis are several orders of magnitude worse than regular racists.

It's like the difference between unironically calling someone a f@ggot for being gay, and committing yourself to a political ideology that the state should execute gay people.

I legitimately feel pity for people that can't tell the difference between the local moron that yells out racial slurs and the group of people responsible for the Holocaust.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
no, we aren't talking about anything vs anything, we are talking about popularly understood definitions to describe a variety of similar types of people. This is what the alt right want you to do split hairs and worry about a specific definition rather than a popularised and widely understood definition. It appeals to the autistic, Incel types, which I've never seen you as and still don't.

And this Silent Master is exactly what the far left wants people to do, blur lines and definitions so you can call right-wingers who have never said a damn white supremacist thing in their life or advocated for any policy on the basis of race, or even those who have explicitly and repeatedly denounced the alt-right and argued for individualist principle of being alt-right for holding mainstream right-wing opinions.

Does Putinbot have any evidence that the people in that video are even racist? Much less white supremacist, alt-right, or even worse neonazi? If so it's pretty weird that there are Mexican Trump supporters.

But don't expect to be able to reason in this manner with him. The dude thinks half of his fellow countrymen in the UK are fascists for supporting Brexit. You're speaking with a radical here.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Unless you think one is better then the other, your complaint is meaningless.
Agreed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I legitimately feel pity for people that can't tell the difference between the local moron that yells out racial slurs and the group of people responsible for the Holocaust.

One is German and the other isn't? 131

Originally posted by Putinbot1
no, we aren't talking about anything vs anything, we are talking about popularly understood definitions to describe a variety of similar types of people. This is what the alt right want you to do split hairs and worry about a specific definition rather than a popularised and widely understood definition. It appeals to the autistic, Incel types, which I've never seen you as and still don't.
Originally posted by Bentley
One is German and the other isn't? 131

Nope, they're both German 😮‍💨

Even rapists look down on paedophiles, I see this as something similar. Merely splitting hairs.

Only this is more like someone that's only fantasied about raping someone being labeled as equal to a group that's raped, tortured and murdered several million people.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only this is more like someone that's only fantasied about raping someone being labeled as equal to a group that's raped, tortured and murdered several million people.
No, because he IS a racist.Like a rapist is a rapist.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
No, because he IS a racist.

Yes and Nazis were far more than just racist, merely being racist wasn't even close to being the most objectionable thing about them.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and Nazis were far more than just racist, merely being racist wasn't even close to being the most objectionable thing about them.
Again We are splitting hairs as racism led to the final solution.

This isn't even close to a splitting hairs scenario. the term splitting hairs is for comparisions where the difference is so small they're not important.

Person A hates Person B

Person C hates Person D

Person C murders Person D because he hates him.

Person A and Person C aren't moral equivalents.

Tell me Putinbot, being consistent with your own logic, you hate incels correct?

Why should I split hairs between you and someone who would actively go out and murder incels?

You can surprise and impress me by admitting your logic doesn't hold, surprise me more and disgust me by suggesting it would be a good thing to kill incels, or not surprise me at all by not addressing the obvious hole in your logic and just moving forward assuming it holds.