Catholic Kids get blamed for something they didnt do

Started by Bashar Teg73 pages

All that gaslighting didn't work, and the little fascist phaggot gets nothing? awwwwww

Originally posted by Putinbot1
haha Maga! Cry more.

😂

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
So, some leftist retard judge threw out the kid's case against The Washington Post... shocker. 🙄

Judge ruled that the Native American who got in the kid's face did it because he "felt threatened." lmao. So I guess that sets a precedent now that anyone who does something unjustified to another person can just claim that he or she "felt threatened." You know, kinda like how Antifa thugs go around beating people up who were merely minding their own business and then later say it was a form of "pro-active self-defense" against so-called "nazis/fascists". lol

Pretty sure a precedent was set with George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
All that gaslighting didn't work, and the little fascist phaggot gets nothing? awwwwww

😂

Exactly, people in the real world are not as stupid as on the internet

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Exactly, people in the real world are not as stupid as on the internet

People in the real world elected Trump and almost elected Hillary, care to rethink your opinion?

The judge's ruling and the point for the case do not make sense.

The lawsuit was about the harmful handling of the story such that it resulted in death threats, ostrization, and the inability for his entire family to do anything because of the mobs - all based on deliberate lies.

This is a lawsuit of libel, not a criminal suit. What does the person - who lied about his military record - have anything to do with feeling threatened by a smirking stick? It wasn't about Philips or the little shit. It was about the libel and the fallout from that libel. There was clear maliciousness in the story and I called within a day of this situation happening - noticed that the video seemed odd and did not show what lead up to the confrontation (and that Philips was beating the drum rather aggressively in the dude's face). I had to scour the internet the next day to find the full 45 minute video. Turned out, I was completely right about every detail.

Despite accusations of gas-lighting the situation the day prior. 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
People in the real world elected Trump and almost elected Hillary, care to rethink your opinion?
I should have said traditionally educated people in the real world like Judges probably. 😆

Originally posted by dadudemon
The judge's ruling and the point for the case do not make sense.

The lawsuit was about the harmful handling of the story such that it resulted in death threats, ostrization, and the inability for his entire family to do anything because of the mobs - all based on deliberate lies.

This is a lawsuit of libel, not a criminal suit. What does the person - who lied about his military record - have anything to do with feeling threatened by a smirking stick? It wasn't about Philips or the little shit. It was about the libel and the fallout from that libel. There was clear maliciousness in the story and I called within a day of this situation happening - noticed that the video seemed odd and did not show what lead up to the confrontation (and that Philips was beating the drum rather aggressively in the dude's face). I had to scour the internet the next day to find the full 45 minute video. Turned out, I was completely right about every detail.

Despite accusations of gas-lighting the situation the day prior. 🙂

IMO, it was a political ruling.

Which way does the judge lean?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Pretty sure a precedent was set with George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin.
🙄

What a sad, pathetic reply jaden. Surely you can do better.

I could just as easily say a precendent was set with OJ Simpson and Nicole. Both statements are irrelevant and have literally zero to do with this topic. Nice troll attempt, dude. 👆

Originally posted by cdtm
Which way does the judge lean?

LOL. Which way do you think?

I've already said it was a leftist judge. He was appoointed by democrat Jimmy the joke Carter.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Exactly, people in the real world are not as stupid as on the internet

That's hilarious coming from you lol. 😂

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Pretty sure a precedent was set with George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin.

Not seeing it. Any way you could look at stand your ground shootings, doesn't really apply to something like this.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
That's hilarious coming from you lol. 😂
silly troll account. Do you really expect us to believe anyone is retarded enough to believe in young earth shit... like you?

"haha a major newspaper got to defame teenagers consequence free! That'll teach the little prick not to smile"-Leftists

Giggle.

Originally posted by Surtur
"haha a major newspaper got to defame teenagers consequence free! That'll teach the little prick not to smile"-Leftists

Giggle.

Let me correct your post for you. Here's take 2:

"haha a major newspaper got to commit egregious libel to an underage teen - such that life-threatening harm become common place - consequence free! That'll teach the little prick not to smile"-Leftists

And I think Silent Master is right: this smacks of corruption. Why would any major news organization want a lawsuit like this to go through? It would require they operate with a higher level of honesty and integrity. Less like propaganda and more like News Reporting.

Originally posted by Surtur
"haha a major newspaper got to defame teenagers consequence free! That'll teach the little prick not to smile"-Leftists

Giggle.

Heh, yeah... seriously, though.. it's not even remotely funny that they can get way with something like this. That kid did absolutely nothing wrong and yet his life is probably ruined now because of the lies of left-wing so-called "news sources" like Washington Post.

It's f***ing disgusting, tbh.

Well again, people clearly see this differently to right wing posters on KMC. I'm not surprised.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Well again, people clearly see this differently to right wing posters on KMC. I'm not surprised.

Silent Master is a left-leaning, slight-libertarian.

As am I.

CDTM may be close.

Surtur comes off as mostly a libertarian.

The only frequent right-wingers I see around here are Fly and eThneoLgrRnae and the jury is still out on whether or not they are the same person.

Would you care to clarify your point with specific people? 🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon
Silent Master is a left-leaning, slight-libertarian.

As am I.

CDTM may be close.

Surtur comes off as mostly a libertarian.

The only frequent right-wingers I see around here are Fly and eThneoLgrRnae and the jury is still out on whether or not they are the same person.

Would you care to clarify your point with specific people? 🙂

like Tim Pool of course he is. As for Libertarians... the cross over is the width of a piece of paper.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
like Tim Pool of course he is. As for Libertarians... the cross over is the width of a piece of paper.

Correct. Like Tim Pool who holds almost an exact match to my political positions, almost down the line. But I know you're just trying to trigger Surtur who seems to love Tim Pool videos.