Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If he is so confident he would win, then why did he settle the case for less than he was seeking when he could have potentially won even more?It is a simple calculation for a company. Paying a firm a six-figure retainer, and hiring a team of thousand dollar and hour lawyers for weeks or months to fight a nuisance suit is a waste of money.
Yep. $50,000 to get Sandmann and his frivolous lawsuit out of their hair is nothing to a mega-corporation the size of AT&T.
Remember when Trump settled his Trump U scandal it meant nothing according to Trumpers, despite Trump saying he doesn't settle and those who settle are guilty? Now settling means you're guilty again.
Originally posted by Robtard👆 😆
Yep. $50,000 to get Sandmann and his frivolous lawsuit out of their hair is nothing to a mega-corporation the size of AT&T.Remember when Trump settled his Trump U scandal it meant nothing according to Trumpers, despite Trump saying he doesn't settle and those who settle are guilty? Now settling means you're guilty again.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yep. $50,000 to get Sandmann and his frivolous lawsuit out of their hair is nothing to a mega-corporation the size of AT&T.
To be fair, a million bucks would be nothing to a mega corp either. Hell Anderson Coopers salary is 4 times that. 10 million bucks probably wouldn't be much to a mega corp either come to think of it.
Remember when Trump settled his Trump U scandal it meant nothing according to Trumpers, despite Trump saying he doesn't settle and those who settle are guilty? Now settling means you're guilty again.
I believe I said it was good that he settled because it meant we could focus on other things, but I actually don't recall saying it did or did not show guilt. Though it was announced they'd been settled over 3 years ago so there could be stuff I don't recall saying about it.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
👆 😆
These yahoos think this is some groundbreaking event and lethal blow to their "Leftis media!" bogeyman and that it will cause change, it won't, it means nothing. Large news agencies like CNN and Fox are sued a lot and they settle out of court, you just heard about this one because it made the news previously.
Now if Sandmann had gone to trial and a jury had awarded him a very large sum that was made public, sure, they'd have a valid point.
The only person who was legitimately invested in this story was you, look how many times you bumped it when you thought Sandmann was winning.
Even the one time you thought Sandman was losing, I asked the same question:
Originally posted by Robtard
@surt You're really taking shitty Nick Sandmann losing in court on a personal level. I have to ask:
Originally posted by Robtard
He's just living vicariously through Sandmann and has been, silly, but no harm in that.
Stop, Coping Time.
Anyways, what do you think about the recent announcement that Sandmann will also be suing Nathan Phillips(the native american in the video)? It's not for anywhere near the amount he sued CNN and others for, but it is still happening.