Originally posted by cdtm
Isn't it a problem to introduce competition for pre-existing ghettoes?And why don't they simply hire from those existing ghettos? That's one of the things I can't understand about this issue: We ALREADY HAVE people in this very country looking for economic opportunity. No one is hiring them.
In the EU the problem is two fold.
1) We decided that individual countries shouldn't build big national investments and that most markets should be open to the competition. This means essentially that the government has little to no saying in who gets hired and which places are prioritized. We have to hope for private sectors to be nice and hire people who are relatively uneducated.
2) Ghetto subcultures are terribly mismanaged. When you get a family that finally gets a break with a good job or a decent education, they move out of the city into a better place and get replaced with another family in dire situation. The prizes of ghetto towns are low because they are essentially hot neighborhoods, so people are kept there because they are poor.
It's also different from places next to big cities or small towns but the situation is very similar. You pretty much give people a place to stay but they have about no motivation to ever stick around. City ghettos are already very diverse as far as the origins of those composing them, technically newcomers would be less welcomed on small towns where misery is more of a "people are old and jobless" issue. I'd need to check exactly if there is documentation in how populations react when foreigns arrive in big numbers to their small communities.