Senate Finds no Collusion.
So that’s the House and the Senate. Even though they found none, Dems have their hopes on that “Trump did Collude” and Mueller will find evidence.
Senate Finds no Collusion.
So that’s the House and the Senate. Even though they found none, Dems have their hopes on that “Trump did Collude” and Mueller will find evidence.
Originally posted by BrolyBlackBit misleading title.
So that’s the House and the Senate. Even though they found none, Dems have their hopes on that “Trump did Collude” and Mueller will find evidence.
But yes, I'm still waiting on the Mueller probe, have been since it started. Hopefully we get to see it either way it lands and Trump's AG doesn't bury it as has been implied.
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So that’s the House and the Senate. Even though they found none, Dems have their hopes on that “Trump did Collude” and Mueller will find evidence.
Lol well there goes that. Womp womp.
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b] Yeah I am sure Mueller will be able to make some up.... [/B]
I think some will be disappointed.
Prepare to be disappointed with Russia investigation conclusion
Trigger warning for snowflakes, Tim Pool video about to be posted:
NO EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION Investigation Concludes
This is his take on the news and he also touches on how journalists are being told the Mueller probe will be a dud.
Again, declaring a victory and flapping your arms around like retards before the Mueller report is finished* is silly, you're only setting yourself up for possible epic levels of Trumper coping.
*again, this is on the grounds the AG releases it and does try to bury
"We may learn there was no indication that President Trump personally did anything illegal. Or Mueller may lay out rock solid proof of a criminal conspiracy or other violations that causes a chain reaction leading to the downfall of the Trump administration." -snip
Originally posted by Robtard
Again, declaring a victory and flapping your arms around like retards before the Mueller report is finished* is silly, you're only setting yourself up for possible epic levels of Trumper coping.*again, this is on the grounds the AG releases it and does try to bury
"We may learn there was no indication that President Trump personally did anything illegal. Or Mueller may lay out rock solid proof of a criminal conspiracy or other violations that causes a chain reaction leading to the downfall of the Trump administration." -snip
No victory has been declared overall, it's merely been said that this investigation found no evidence of collusion.
That's a silly comparison and equalization tactic, but that's to be expected. No one seemingly attacked Mueller on being on a "witch hunt", attacked Mueller for being part of the "deep state" or mentioned that he's on some personal vendetta because of Comey thereby attacking his integrity which Trumpers have done since June of 2016, weeks after he was appointed. The concern (if you read) is very specific:
“If the special counsel hasn’t subpoenaed Deutsche Bank, he can’t be doing much of a money laundering investigation,” Schiff said. “So that’s what concerns me, that that red line has been enforced, whether by the deputy attorney general or by some other party at the Justice Department. But that leaves the country exposed.” -snip
If that's true, then Schiff can look into it if he wishes and goes through the proper channels.
IMO, Trump businesses laundering money for Russian interest is a legitimate concern and should be looked heavily into, as it could very well be true. Though I suspect Mueller has at least glimpsed into this.
Originally posted by Robtard
That's a silly comparison and equalization tactic, but that's to be expected. No one seemingly attacked Mueller on being on a "witch hunt", attacked Mueller for being part of the "deep state" or mentioned that he's on some personal vendetta because of Comey thereby attacking his integrity which Trumpers have done since June of 2016, weeks after he was appointed. The concern (if you read) is very specific:“If the special counsel hasn’t subpoenaed Deutsche Bank, he can’t be doing much of a money laundering investigation,” Schiff said. “So that’s what concerns me, that that red line has been enforced, whether by the deputy attorney general or by some other party at the Justice Department. But that leaves the country exposed.” -snip
If that's true, then Schiff can look into it if he wishes and goes through the proper channels.
IMO, Trump businesses laundering money for Russian interest is a legitimate concern and should be looked heavily into, as it could very well be true. Though I suspect Mueller has at least glimpsed into this.
It's clear they're already coming out with excuses for if Mueller comes back with nothing solid lol. If Mueller's so great he doesn't need Adam Schiff to tell him what should or should not be looked into.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbvWlzzIFl8
Campbell tells me his FBI handlers assured him they had briefed Obama and then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, now the Russia special prosecutor, on Rosatom’s criminal activities as part of the president's daily briefing and that agents suggested to him that “politics” was the reason the sale was allowed to go through.
Originally posted by Surtur
Dems, Fearing Russia Collusion Investigation Will Come Up Empty, Now Attacking Robert Mueller😆
Good.