Jussie Smollett attack

Originally posted by Surtur
This is gonna be hilarious, I can't wait to see them dig the hole even deeper.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Looks like a baseless claim to me, since "the leftists here" have said we should allow the system to work, and if he is found guilty, he should face the appropriate punishment.

I do, however, see "the rightists here" with one standard for Smollett and a different standard for Trump:

[QUOTE=16837902]Originally posted by Surtur
[B]Anyways, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. I want someone here to actually come out and say that shouldn't be the case. Just say we don't need evidence. Then you guys can just circle jerk over your Trump hatred.

B-b-b-but that's different because Trump.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No one excused him if he set this up. No one. You just carry on like a moron.

This is a strawman they'll been pushing for pages when no one has excused Smollet should he be guilty. Surt's just lying again.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is a strawman they'll been pushing for pages when on one has excused Smollet should he be guilty. Surt's just lying again.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Looks like a baseless claim to me, since "the leftists here" have said we should allow the system to work, and if he is found guilty, he should face the appropriate punishment.

I do, however, see "the rightists here" with one standard for Smollett and a different standard for Trump:

Lol kiddo your hypocrisy has already been noted on the "let's wait for proof" thing. I'd move on from that tactic.

And the claims about Trump are extraordinary. It doesn't even compare to what Jussie alleges. Jesus, do better. Truly...do better.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is a strawman they'll been pushing for pages when no one has excused Smollet should he be guilty. Surt's just lying again.

Irony overload.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol kiddo your hypocrisy has already been noted on the "let's wait for proof" thing. I'd move on from that tactic.

And the claims about Trump are extraordinary. It doesn't even compare to what Jussie alleges. Jesus, do better. Truly...do better.

Roger Stone and the Convington teens.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Roger Stone and the Convington teens.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Roger Stone and the Convington teens.

You also gotta love how he's equating giving nuclear capabilities to the Saudi's with...gay black man says some Trumpers committed a hate crime.

Let's wait for the standard "mental illness" excuse, because no one can be actually malicious so therefore they must have "mental issues".

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quote.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He is a ****ing criminal and a traitor to his own country. Who the **** cares?

Originally posted by gauntlet o doom
Let's wait for the standard "mental illness" excuse, because no one can be actually malicious so therefore they must have "mental issues".

I'm fairly sure that multiple people on this board would buy that excuse.

Originally posted by snowdragon

👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol kiddo your hypocrisy has already been noted on the "let's wait for proof" thing. I'd move on from that tactic.

And the claims about Trump are extraordinary. It doesn't even compare to what Jussie alleges. Jesus, do better. Truly...do better.

Why is one conspiracy more plausible than the other? Remind me which has had arrests and indictments again?

Originally posted by snowdragon

Innocent till proven guilty in Adams book if your a black gay man. Guilty till proven innocent in every other way otherwise.

Person A: Show proof
Person B: Shows proof
Person A: Doesn't count
Everyone else: 🙄

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Innocent till proven guilty in Adams book if your a black gay man. Guilty till proven innocent in every other way otherwise.

You gotta love how the hypocrisy is being spun lol. We all knew he lacks the sac to say "yeah he's a hypocrite here".

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quote.

Conservatives were crying about the way Stone was treated, despite investigators having gathered evidence of criminal activity, submitting it to a judge who ruled their was sufficient evidence to issue a warrant, and prosecutors using the evidence gathered to indict him four times over. You know, totally no evidence of wrong doing. There is virtually no difference between he, and someone whom is only rumored to have done something wrong.