Jussie Smollett attack

Started by Raptor2268 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Quote editing is a rather common form of trolling, does anyone else notice the hypocrisy that the person responsible is one who just recently hoped that someone would be banned for trolling.
the few times you've done it to me ive just taken ur word for it being due to incompetence. But now i see it could be due to some form of trolling. Thank u for opening my eyes.

Does anyone else notice the hypocrisy of someone who calls people out for post editing yet does the same themselves?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=16834861&highlight=userid%3A118272#post16834861

Is this guy in jail yet.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I agree with this and it should be applied to all situations.

Tbh, I think it was always seemed unbelievable to me and many others. The whole thing has been so dumb.

same question to you about Casey Anthony. Or OJ Simpson for that matter. I'm all in favor of due process in terms of actual prosecution.. but you really don't think there's enough evidence to have an informed opinion on what happened? I don't think any one is asking you to mount a legal case, just whether or not you think he did it.

Originally posted by Raptor22
the few times you've done it to me ive just taken ur word for it being due to incompetence. But now i see it could be due to some form of trolling. Thank u for opening my eyes.

Does anyone else notice the hypocrisy of someone who calls people out for post editing yet does the same themselves?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=16834861&highlight=userid%3A118272#post16834861

That link was me editing my own post because I made a mistake, not editing your post to change what you said. which is what Bash did. he changed the wording of my posts.

Are you so desperate for a gotcha moment that you have to misrepresent what someone is talking about?

Originally posted by Silent Master

Are you so desperate for a gotcha moment that you have to misrepresent what someone is talking about?

^^your modus operandi. That's why nobody takes you seriously, and why your constant credibility attacks are roundly ignored: You're a joke

The far left are the only ones that claim to "not take me seriously" and that is only because they can't refute my points so they have to say something to make themselves feel better.

Originally posted by Silent Master
That link was me editing my own post because I made a mistake, not editing your post to change what you said. which is what Bash did. he changed the wording of my posts.

Are you so desperate for a gotcha moment that you have to misrepresent what someone is talking about?

desperation would imply that u dont provide me with those moments on a regular basis. Thankfully u do.

Originally posted by Raptor22
desperation would imply that u dont provide me with those moments on a regular basis. Thankfully u do.

Then why didn't you provide an legit example? instead of posting a link where I corrected a mistake in my own post when I was pointing out that Bash was completely re-writing my posts in order to troll me.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Then why didn't you provide an legit example? instead of posting a link where I corrected a mistake in my own post when I was pointing out that Bash was completely re-writing my posts in order to troll me.
why would I? I mean i guess if it were relevent to the debate. But u being triggered over an offhand comment isnt a good enough reason. Do u not agree?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=658880&pagenumber=6

"See, you're doing it now. when I request proof from guys like h1 it's because they've made a claim that is relevant to the debate. not because I'm triggered over an off-hand comment."

"Yes, when they're relevant to the debate. not when I'm triggered because of an off-hand comment."

Stop being so triggered.

^ says the guy that keeps following me around and can't seem to post a single valid example.

Originally posted by Silent Master
^ says the guy that keeps following me around and can't seem to post a single valid example.

"See, you're doing it now. when I request proof from guys like h1 it's because they've made a claim that is relevant to the debate. not because I'm triggered over an off-hand comment."

"Yes, when they're relevant to the debate. not when I'm triggered because of an off-hand comment."

U wouldnt be trying to hold me to a higher standard than u hold urself to, r u?

That seems like it would be a bit hypocritical of u.

Stop being so triggered by offhand comments

So in trying to further his career he has now phucked it up?

Originally posted by Raptor22
"See, you're doing it now. when I request proof from guys like h1 it's because they've made a claim that is relevant to the debate. not because I'm triggered over an off-hand comment."

"Yes, when they're relevant to the debate. not when I'm triggered because of an off-hand comment."

U wouldnt be trying to hold me to a higher standard than u hold urself to, r u?

That seems like it would be a bit hypocritical of u.

Stop being so triggered by offhand comments

I am holding you to the same standard.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^your modus operandi. That's why nobody takes you seriously, and why your constant credibility attacks are roundly ignored: You're a joke

What are you two arguing about? Post edits or something?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I am holding you to the same standard.
how so? U refused to provide any proof or examples of the claim u made against me. Yet now are being critical of me for doing the same to u. How is that the same.?

Originally posted by steverules_2
What are you two arguing about? Post edits or something?

I commented that bash was trolling me by completely re-writing my posts, IE quote editing. rap jumped on what he thought was a gotcha moment and posts an example where I edited my own post to remove a mistake.

Apparently he can't tell the difference between the two.

Originally posted by steverules_2
So in trying to further his career he has now phucked it up?

He could have tried to latch onto a real hate crime and raise awareness over it. He wanted to be a victim and suffers from TDS. This is why he had to go the extra mile and add in the MAGA shit.

Originally posted by steverules_2
What are you two arguing about? Post edits or something?
Silent and i bicker. I dont like Silent because hes a douche and he doesnt like me because im smarter and better looking than him. There's really not much more to it than that.

Originally posted by mike brown
what are your thoughts on Casey Anthony.. did she kill the kid or no?

I always thought that Anthony should not have been charged. How can a prosecutor prove murder when they do not even have a body? Certainly her child met with some misfortune, but we have no idea what that misfortune is. She could have been sold to a wealthy family in a private adoption for all we know. Overzealous prosecutors and an outraged public demanding action is a recipe for a botched case.