Jussie Smollett attack

Started by mike brown68 pages

I didn't ask you if you could mount a legal case
I made sure to specifically ask if you personally think she killed her daughter.

Originally posted by mike brown
I didn't ask you if you could mount a legal case
I made sure to specifically ask if you personally think she killed her daughter.

And I told you that we have no idea what happened to her daughter. Her daughter was never found. So how can anyone reasonably believe the daughter was murdered? The only thing we know is her daughter is missing.

So if you were forced to bet... Assuming the casino knows the true answer... It would be a complete toss up to you? Might as well flip a coin?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
And I told you that we have no idea what happened to her daughter. Her daughter was never found. So how can anyone reasonably believe the daughter was murdered? The only thing we know is her daughter is missing.

I thought they found her body?

No they didn’t, anyone who suggests she didn’t kill or assist in killing her daughter is a phucking moron.

They did

It’s like saying OJ didn’t kill Nicole and Ron.

I believe he hired ron to kill Nicole and then when ron went to give the knife he borrowed back to OJ he turned it on ron

#theperfectcrime

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
No they didn’t, anyone who suggests she didn’t kill or assist in killing her daughter is a phucking moron.

*yes they did

They found her remains and skull wrapped in a garbage bag buried in the woods.

And the mothers story was full of holes and shady as ****

It's just another one of those examples where they didn't have a strong enough case to get the murder 1 conviction but it's pretty ****in obvious she's responsible... If they would have went with manslaughter they'd have got her

Moral of the story being that due process is needed but the courts aren't infallible and you should be able to have an opinion independent of the courts.,. Since they ultimately really on other people's opinions anyway

Originally posted by steverules_2
What are you two arguing about? Post edits or something?

Compare our responses to you, that should tell you everything you need to know.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Yeah, in hindsight it's pretty obvious. Anyone who was really dragged/choked/etc in a noose would take that shit off their neck the second they were able.

You're right. It's really odd that he kept it on long after he even got to the hospital, despite medical staff trying to remove it, after he got to the hospital where is specifically stated that he kept it on, on purpose, so the police could see. That's a whole lotta cringe.

He was an actor wearing his stage props, performing on the abstracted stage of the mass media.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
You started with the buttmad flaming. I had no quarrel with anyone and stated a harmless opinion. seriously, f*ck you.

Calm down, Fly.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
To be fair, sexual assault victims are instructed not to destroy evidence. They are not permitted to rinse, brush, or drink; to rinse or wash any part of their body; use the restroom; or change their clothes. They have to sit for hours in the fluids of the person who attacked them, parched and holding their bladder. So I can see the 9-1-1 operator instructing him not to disturb anything.

Yes, yes, yes. Until AFTER they get to the medical facility and get a rape kit administered.

A nurse or attending physician can certainly take a noose off a neck. They'd be wearing gloves, anyway. They can take his bleachy clothes off, too.

He didn't want that to happen.

Congratulations: you've just made a very good case for why Jussie was hamming it up to put on a show - he refused to take those things off "until the police" saw. He's delusional as hell.

Originally posted by Raptor22
why would I?

Because you are making the claim and making claims like this is still things people get banned for, around here, without evidence.

I don't know why, though. I guess it is a peeve of the last remaining mods.

Anyway, does Silent Master do the post-quote editing trolling thing?

I have done it in the past but it has been a while. I would never deny something like this because it is very innocuous.

Originally posted by Raptor22
Silent and i bicker. I dont like Silent because hes a douche and he doesnt like me because im smarter and better looking than him. There's really not much more to it than that.

I legit laughed out loud. This is the same kind of trolling that I do. WEEEEEE!

haermm

👆

It's all fun and games until he starts sending you pictures of him in his furry outfits.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Compare our responses to you, that should tell you everything you need to know.

What? You already answered that question on the previous page

Originally posted by dadudemon
Calm down, Fly.

Did you see him say I should be banned for it? Lol...

eager sidekick gimp. grown man in his mid 30's, triggered by innocent word games