Originally posted by Emperordmb
Plato's one of my seven favorite non-Jesus philosophers.The list includes, Plato, Saint Irenaeus, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Rene Descartes, John Locke, Aldous Huxley, and Jordan Peterson.
Plato also liked to take young boys camping 😛
I thought JP was at least somewhat Christian religious?
Originally posted by Robtard
You're moving the goal post now. Did you think I'd not notice. You did what I claimed.
How am I moving the goalposts? Legit wondering. It was you and Adam who brought up the first amendment and shit. I was not asking if I had a legal right to this, so why mention it? Why say I want special rules for the first amendment, then? That implies I was talking about legalities. I am not.
Originally posted by Robtard
Plato also liked to take young boys camping 😛I thought JP was at least somewhat religious?
I didn't mean non-religious philosophers, otherwise two of them wouldn't be Saints in the Catholic Church.
Originally posted by Surtur
How am I moving the goalposts? Legit wondering. It was you and Adam who brought up the first amendment and shit. I was not asking if I had a legal right to this, so why mention it? Why say I want special rules for the first amendment, then? That implies I was talking about legalities. I am not.
Originally posted by EmperordmbI'm taking about the cultural standards. No one is going to get arrested for saying "White pride", but there might be consequences.
Surtur is obviously asking about the cultural standards, not the legal standards. Adam oft deflects from cultural to legal when someone criticizes a certain cultural standard of the progressive left.
Originally posted by Emperordmb
By non-Jesus I mean not including Jesus on the list because he supersedes the list.I didn't mean non-religious philosophers, otherwise two of them wouldn't be Saints in the Catholic Church.
yeah, I misread you, I thought your list wasn't encompassing. But still, misread.
Originally posted by Robtard
I'm taking about the cultural standards. No one is going to get arrested for saying "White pride", but there might be consequences.
Originally posted by Robtard
I'm taking about the cultural standards. No one is going to get arrested for saying "White pride", but there might be consequences.
So why the f*ck were people bringing up free speech and shit? Was it stupidity or ignorance or trolling? Honestly asking. Did you truly feel I meant legalities?
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I think you and Robtard have a bias against each other that colors your interactions, but I think Adam is being deliberately disingenuous.
Eh, I'd argue Rob tries to troll me and my points more than I do him. I'm usually trolling him back as opposed to instigating it lol.
Originally posted by SurturAs an impartial observer, I am agreeing with DMB, I will extend it, your relationships with many posters colour your interactions. We are not always out to troll you. You are so defensive like a curled up armadillo but less cute. Now chill about fee-fees.
What I said was accurate, should I pretend otherwise to spare your fee fee's?
Originally posted by Putinbot1
As an impartial observer, I am agreeing with DMB, I will extend it, your relationships with many posters colour your interactions. We are not always out to troll you. You are so defensive like a curled up armadillo but less cute. Now chill about fee-fees.
Well even DMB in the past has agreed people here have Surtur Derangement Syndrome soo..
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I do think you set out to start arguments, that though is part of the fun of a message board so I have no problem with that. Just think you do it and play victim too much.
I don't set out to start arguments all the time lol. I think far more often people pounce on shit I say and feign ignorance over it. Hell you yourself have been triggered by my very presence in threads.
We've seen it here too dude. I legit didn't bring up legalities around speech. We had two dipshits pretending otherwise anyways.
Originally posted by SurturBut even the use of the phrase dipshit when people have admitted a misunderstanding is confrontational. Anyway, I've said my piece.
I don't set out to start arguments all the time lol. I think far more often people pounce on shit I say and feign ignorance over it.We've seen it here dude. I legit didn't bring up legalities around speech. We had two dipshits pretending otherwise anyways.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
But even the use of the phrase dipshit when people have admitted a misunderstanding is confrontational. Anyway, I've said my piece.
Lol nah it's not confrontational given everything I've been called in the past. A person IS a dipshit if they thought I meant legalities.
Originally posted by SurturPretending to be self important is part of the victim complex you have, Surt.
Well even DMB in the past has agreed people here have Surtur Derangement Syndrome soo..
You also on many occasion attack me (and others) for making a post that has nothing to do with you. It's fine, I don't mind, but you acting like the constant victim always is silly.