Trump Officials Tried To Rush Nuclear Technology To Saudis - NPR

Started by Surtur7 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
^ Surtur's in a rage because he was shown his own hypocrisy and he didn't like it

Interesting, what about my post indicates rage? I'd love an explanation. It can't be the use of the word phaggot since you've used it lol. So go on, let me know.

Originally posted by Robtard
When Trump gives money to his own campaign, those funds are no longer his own private funds but fall under the campaign finance rules and regulations. Come on, do better than this.

Oh so you care about campaign finance violations, correct? These bother you?

*Deflection/whataboutism imminent*

Originally posted by Robtard
*Deflection/whataboutism imminent*

It's a simple question, what is your answer? Oh, and what about my other post indicated rage?

Figured it was obvious. The whole post seething with anger and frustration at the corners you Trumpers consistently corner yourselves in. /that

Originally posted by Robtard
Figured it was obvious. The whole post seething with anger and frustration at the corners you Trumpers consistently corner yourselves in. /that

Nah it's not so you're gonna need to explain how it was seething with anger lol. Look, lets cuz the BS: we both know in the end you'd say it's cuz I used the word phaggot. The reason you're gonna be vague about why my post was full of rage is because you yourself have used the word in the past lol. So you'd look silly to just come out and specifically say that, which is a smart move 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Yes really kiddo. This entire saga got started when leftists pounced.

Hate crimes have increased 17% since the election, with African-Americans, followed by LGBT people being the most-targeted for bias-motivated violence.

With this in mind, it was reported that a gay black man was the victim of a totally believable crime.

And because he is a principal character on a popular television program, people expressed their sympathy for him on social media.

Oh, the horror! Pounced, indeed!

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
ORLY? Because BrolyBlack started the Smollett thread, and it is mostly conservatives here who are obsessed with it. So who is pushing what exactly?

I live in the gym every evening for 2 is hours.

The TVs have the news stations on.

And I read reddit when pooping.

Here's what happened:

1. Jussie case broke and all the lefty news sites went ape shit for days. Days.
2. Moderate to limited converage from fact-heavy sites and convservative sites.
3. Info started to point that Jussie was a hoax-er. Lefty sites scrambled to justify that it was still MAGA freaks.
4. Case started to crumble. Coverage started to drop with the lefties.
5. Coverage increased among the conservative places.
6. Case nearly died down. It's now a trickle.

The primary driver for all activity was the left.

Interest is waning.

Look, here's the data:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%201-m&geo=US&q=Jussie%20Smollett

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Hate crimes have increased 17% since the election, with African-Americans, followed by LGBT people being the most-targeted for bias-motivated violence.

With this in mind, it was reported that a gay black man was the victim of a totally believable crime.

And because he is a principal character on a popular television program, people expressed their sympathy for him on social media.

Oh, the horror! Pounced, indeed!

Hate crimes didn't increase because of Trump. Do better next time you post 👆

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
So enlighten me: what's worse than trying to give homicidal maniacs nuclear capabilities?

But isn't that what Obama tried to do with the Iranians? Puts him and Trump on the same level imo

Originally posted by dadudemon
I live in the gym every evening for 2 is hours.

The TVs have the news stations on.

And I read reddit when pooping.

Here's what happened:

1. Jussie case broke and all the lefty news sites went ape shit for days. Days.
2. Moderate to limited converage from fact-heavy sites and convservative sites.
3. Info started to point that Jussie was a hoax-er. Lefty sites scrambled to justify that it was still MAGA freaks.
4. Case started to crumble. Coverage started to drop with the lefties.
5. Coverage increased among the conservative places.
6. Case nearly died down. It's now a trickle.

The primary driver for all activity was the left.

Interest is waning.

Look, here's the data:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%201-m&geo=US&q=Jussie%20Smollett

It's baffling they think it's conservatives who first started this. Nah, they started this and we're finishing it. They need to deal with that shit, these morons made this big news. These morons used it as an excuse to talk shit about all Trump supporters. They need to reconcile with what they've done and perhaps next time not be so dumb they get duped this easily.

Remember: Adam has consistently acted like this case wasn't suspicious from day 1.

Originally posted by Lestov16
But isn't that what Obama tried to do with the Iranians? Puts him and Trump on the same level imo

This is an unfair comparison; here's why:

The US-Iran deal was not done in secrecy to being with like this deal was apparently and the main purpose of the deal was so Iran wouldn't seek nukes, ie giving Iran a few billion in their frozen assets back in return that they abide by a no-nuke weapon policy. Win for them, win for the US.

When Trump pulled out of the deal, Iran got to keep its billions in assets while no longer having to abide by the no-nuke agreement. Trump literally gave Iran the best deal, they got everything and the US got nothing in return.

So again I wanna know: do we need evidence or not? Cuz the topic creator called the fact people questioned it cuz there is no evidence and just anonymous sources...an attempt to label this fake news. Which is asinine, but there it is.

So I gotta ask, evidence required...yay or nay?

Evidence is required, obviously.

Gut feeling, it's true. Another Trump corruption scandal.

It’s always different when the shoe is on the other foot Rob

Originally posted by Robtard
Evidence is required, obviously.

Gut feeling, it's true. Another Trump corruption scandal.

Nice so you agree it's not crying "fake news" to merely ask for evidence, correct? Just looking for a yes or no here, not a yes or no followed by excuses.

Originally posted by Surtur
Hate crimes didn't increase because of Trump. Do better next time you post 👆

I did not say they did. Try harder.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I did not say they did. Try harder.

Oh, good! I thought you were being a weasel and trying to imply it cuz you mentioned they increased since the election instead of merely saying they increased since 2016. My bad you totally weren't trying to do that 👆

Originally posted by Surtur
Nice so you agree it's not crying "fake news" to merely ask for evidence, correct? Just looking for a yes or no here, not a yes or no followed by excuses.

Question: Why did you freak out over Smollet before anything solid was known about his possible hoax involvement?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
It’s always different when the shoe is on the other foot Rob

I literally said "evidence is required" here, so...