Originally posted by Newjak
The point that brought up the whole Democracy vs Republic part was a reply to me talking about the EC and preferring popular vote for president.
Makes sense. I never once talked about the electoral college and only responded to XYZ's terribly view about pure democracy being amazing.
Originally posted by Newjak
Not all founding fathers agreed with Jefferson though 😬
I feel like I've covered this, specifically, with you, 3 different times, now. Maybe I'm mistaken. But Jefferson admitted his hypocrisy with slavery. And it has since been rectified (a long time ago). It's not relevant and hasn't been for over 150 years. And it was a direct affront to Natural Rights for those southern representatives/leaders objecting to abolition. Which was also heavily debated. So much so it almost prevented the country (USA) from being formed and stabilizing. And it still didn't go away and led to a war, 80 years later.
Originally posted by Newjak
And naturally as the world social structure changes what is needed to meet people's natural rights or give them a livable standard will also change.
And this concept is within Lockean Natural Rights, as well. Such as access to fair internet, electricity, clean water, etc.
Who knows, in the future, Natural Rights will expand to to "Virtual Therapy Worlds" where these VTWs are essential to keep you sane during the Virtual Age (the technology age after the Post-Information-Age, which we are in, now).
Edit - Oh, hey...what do you think about Rank Choice Voting? Ireland does it. So there's at least one "good freedom loving" country doing it.