Originally posted by Blakemore
Darwin was wrong on a lot of things and was known to be a religious Quaker... he was proven wrong by a lot of scientists but right in that animals adapt to their environments dick wad. So your "micro-evolution" has been proven and even your scholar Kent acknowledges it. He's just not understood biology because he never took that class because he's a con man.
No shit microevolution is real, dumbass. Darwinism ecompasses a lot more than just microevolution though. There is a lot of fantasy/science fiction BS involved with his "theory".
Simply put, what is incorrectly called "microevolution" is real, but the rest of his theory is pure imagination.