Originally posted by Adam_PoE
For starters, there is no evidence Trump is an actual billionaire. He refuses to release his tax returns. Valuations of his wealth are literally based on his own word. And he testified under oath that he estimates his net worth based on his feelings. Independent auditors believe he is only worth millions, and he inherited millions to start with.
You'd think Trumpers would be all over Bloomberg's tiny penis like they are Trumps, he's an elitist billionaire from New York, he has a history of behaving poorly towards Black people and he's even wealthier and self-made.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Go easy on Adam, squall. He's obviously triggered over Trump just being acquitted forever. 😉
Who is triggered? Everyone knew he was going to be acquitted. It does not change that there are still 12 unpardonable districts waiting for the day he steps foot out of office to bring him up on charges and send him to prison for the rest of his life. Nor will it change that he will be remembered forever as the most corrupt president in history. And history will also remember his supporters who cheered corruption like retards.
Originally posted by Robtard
You'd think Trumpers would be all over Bloomberg's tiny penis like they are Trumps, he's an elitist billionaire from New York, he has a history of behaving poorly towards Black people and he's even wealthier and self-made.
You'd think democrats would not be changing rules to accommodate him given their hatred of billionaires and stuff. Though I know you guys will have an excuse for that too.
Originally posted by Robtard
You'd think Trumpers would be all over Bloomberg's tiny penis like they are Trumps, he's an elitist billionaire from New York, he has a history of behaving poorly towards Black people and he's even wealthier and self-made.
It was never about being self-made or wealthy, it was about legitimizing their bigotry.
Originally posted by Robtard
What an odd thing to say towards me as I said I found that sudden change distasteful and shitty
Hey I will be glad if nobody here comes up with an excuse for it. So it seems you won't try, we shall see if the other usual suspects make an attempt. Or perhaps they have learned and will not do so.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Who is triggered? Everyone knew he was going to be acquitted. It does not change that there are still 12 unpardonable districts waiting for the day he steps foot out of office to bring him up on charges and send him to prison for the rest of his life.Nor will it change that he will be remembered forever as the most corrupt president in history. And history will also remember his supporters who cheered corruption like retards.
I don't think anyone is going to go after Trump once he's loses in Nov. Certainly more of chance than Trump going after Hillary which he still uses "Lock her up!" to get his retards frothing and they still froth, but I wouldn't bet on it.
'Most. Corrupt. President. In. History.' That's not something you want as your legacy. His supporters will largely dry up when he loses.
Originally posted by Surtur
Yep people expected acquittal which is why nobody will ever whine about it. Mark my words: this will not happen 🙂Cuz, by golly, if it still happened despite folk expecting it...that would destroy narratives.
Not sure what your rant has to do with what I said? But I giggled that you were triggered by it.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
About 240,000 turned out for Obama/Clinton. It dropped to 170,000 for Clinton/Sanders, and it is still there now. Low voter participation is not good for the general election, but it is also an indictment of the central premise of the Sanders candidacy. He did not bring the Revolution. That is why his campaign always cites his number of individual donations, instead of his number of unique donors: it over-inflates their sense of his actual support. He has a ceiling of unique donors who contribute in small amounts over-and-over again. It adds up to a lot of money, and a large number of individual donations, but those are not 1:1 correspondent with actual voters.
I was looking into this and had a meeting to go to.
This is very telling of what I have been talking about:
The Iowa caucus is a case study of this reality. While Republicans reveled in record turnouts, Democrats faced an entirely different scenario. [/B]
What the Dems in power have done is only energize conservatives and Republicans and alienated Independents.
Lower turnout than even 2016 is what the Salon article said.
A former Republican speechwriter said that the lower than expected turnout is due to lose gusto due to the terrible Impeachment efforts from the Dems:
"The Republican base is hugely energized to go out and vote for Donald Trump," Thiessen said. "And because they're about to lose the impeachment fight, that they [Democrats] spent three years trying to get to this moment and they're now losing, their enthusiasm is dissipated."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/marc-thiessen-democrats-turnout-in-iowa-hurt-by-impeachment
And that's probably right. The impeachment move was the wrong move from Dems.
Originally posted by SquallX
So I guess the next tine your child comes to you and say dad look, I got an A on my test, you look at your child and say, you didn’t get that A, I get that you that A because I helped you study.
You know he's homosexual, right? Unless he adopts, he and his partner/future husband will not have babies any time soon (but that sure won't stop them from trying their best to inseminate each other).
Use a different comparison because this one was shitty.
#poopbabies
Originally posted by dadudemon
lol, we are talking about gay sex and this page is on....69!WEEEEEEE!
Doing the numbers sex stuff!
U said the magic word! 69...now it's time, for you, believable...