didn't i just have a huge thread devoted to this topic? this debate about what's a valid debate strategy? 😂
i actually see both sides of this. i PREFER carver's strategy here and i understand fully why he sees it as power set debating. but by the strictest rules of the forum ds's approach is equally valid. i really dislike that approach though for the simple fact that it removes the character from the medium that is used to DEFINE HIS CHARACTER.
we're essentially saying--here is a fictional character. LITERALLY everything we know about said character we know based on the medium (comics in this case). but what happens here? we REMOVE said character from the medium and apply real world logic (something that is constantly railed against in the forum) to say--IF said character were to exist OUTSIDE THE MEDIUM THAT FULLY DEFINES HIM, THEN he/she/it would behave in this manner....
that's obviously because along with defining said character, the medium also LIMITS said character (in the form of the too-often-cited PIS). but we really do pick and choose when we draw the type of distinction ds is making--again a perfectly valid forum argument. the medium says, over and over, that superman would get hit here. the VAST bulk of evidence supports this fact. logic says he wouldn't.
the discrepancy can not be reconciled. no where else in the entire world i suspect, is the weight of evidence more meaningless than in this type of setting. 😂
but if carver can't use evidence from the medium that defines superman as proof he would get hit, what DOES he use here? nothing? then this is a non-argument (as i know some feel it to be). but that assertion is contradicted directly and often within the medium itself! we've even SEEN hulk and superman fight--multiple times. and NONE of their battles support the non-argument stance. nor ds's stance for that matter. again, if we can't use DIRECT, ON PANEL PROOF to say ds's version of how this would go down is wrong, and we resort to a simply real world, logical stance, what's the point in turning to the comics at all?
mmm