Christchurch NZ Terror Attacks

Started by carthage12 pages
carthage PLEASE PROTECT ME STONES

I saw and it and also started reading various posts on 8chan congratulating the shooter, blaming Jews/Europe immigration policy, and posting memes of Nazi anime chicks

It makes you hate the human race

Robtard Senor Member

I don’t need to see a murder taking place to acknowledge that murder is awful.

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Robtard
I’ll watch what a want, thank you very much.

I never argued differently. My point was that you don't have to enjoy something to watch it. There was a crime in Morocco not too long ago with two hiking tourists being raped and beheaded, and the beheading of one of them was filmed and uploaded to the web. The reason people flocked to watch that video was out of obligation, not because they enjoyed it.

Originally posted by Robtard
So what I said also.

No. You said it was to incite violence against muslims. This was done, in part, to incite violence against non-muslims by muslims.

Robtard Senor Member

I never said nor implied that people watch it due to enjoyment. You watch it for whatever reasons you need.

According to the article, that was one of the reasons given by the shooter, to incite further violence against Muslims. If you also can’t link how a Muslim uprising would lead to violence on both sides, then you’re being naive

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Robtard
I don’t need to see a murder taking place to acknowledge that murder is awful.
when i lived in KSA people would go to chop-chop square. To be honestbitbdisgusted me.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Robtard
I never said nor implied that people watch it due to enjoyment. You watch it for whatever reasons you need.

According to the article, that was one of the reasons given by the shooter, to incite further violence against Muslims. If you also can’t link how a Muslim uprising would lead to violence on both sides, then you’re being naive

Muslim uprising, lol, most muslims are pepple bringing up families, not incels with nothing to lose.

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Robtard
I never said nor implied that people watch it due to enjoyment.

Yes you did imply it when you said that you won't watch it because you wouldn't enjoy it.

Originally posted by Robtard
According to the article, that was one of the reasons given by the shooter, to incite further violence against Muslims.

In that case you're misinformed. Which is why I pointed out that limiting your exposure to the crime through various media outlets is stupid.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you also can’t link how a Muslim uprising would lead to violence on both sides, then you’re being naive

I was the one who pointed it out to you.
Originally posted by Astner
Actually it was to provoke muslims to retaliate and spark a civil war.
But there's a direct intent and an indirect intent, and you're focusing on the latter as if it was the most pertinent, when it's not. In fact it's a very unlikely outcome. The retaliation against non-muslims, in contrast, is very likely.

Robtard Senor Member

Literally speaking from a personal standpoint only.

No, I checked. Still the same, he wanted to incite others to do the same as he did.

Which supports the first point of mine you commented on.

So it seems you just want to argue because I somehow hurt your feelings with my comment about my personal choice in not watching the video.

(And if you also believe there are not some people who watch it for sick enjoyment purposes, you've doubly naive. Bye now.)

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Astner

The retaliation against non-muslims, in contrast, is very likely.

no, not from a Muslim minority, in a peaceful first world country. Even in Africa where I work Boko Haram are kept out of main population areas and have zero support from.most Muslims.

Adam_PoE Senior Member
Originally posted by Astner
Yes you did imply it when you said that you won't watch it because you wouldn't enjoy it.

That is a logical fallacy. You are inferring a positive conclusion from a negative premise.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
That is a logical fallacy. You are inferring a positive conclusion from a negative premise.
yup

Lestov16 CTU Field Agent

Does anybody remember when Charlie Hebdo was attacked and a bunch of Muslims were saying that the Charlie Hebdo journalists brought it on themselves for drawing Muhammad? Peppridge Farms remembers....

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by Lestov16
Does anybody remember when Charlie Hebdo was attacked and a bunch of Muslims were saying that the Charlie Hebdo journalists brought it on themselves for drawing Muhammad? Peppridge Farms remembers....
Yeah, some Muslims said some stuff. What's your point?

Robtard Senor Member

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi said it. Who else?

Adam_PoE Senior Member
Originally posted by Lestov16
Does anybody remember when Charlie Hebdo was attacked and a bunch of Muslims were saying that the Charlie Hebdo journalists brought it on themselves for drawing Muhammad? Peppridge Farms remembers....

Remember when Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson said that America deserved to be attacked on 9/11 because it does not criminalize abortion, feminism, or homosexuality?

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Remember when Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson said that America deserved to be attacked on 9/11 because it does not criminalize abortion, feminism, or homosexuality?

I actually forget about that gem. These people hate America.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Originally posted by carthage
I saw and it and also started reading various posts on 8chan congratulating the shooter, blaming Jews/Europe immigration policy, and posting memes of Nazi anime chicks

It makes you hate the human race

Yeah, we see this sort of posting but with more creative language here, we know who the posters who share those views are.

Putinbot1 Restricted

Anyway, guys, the neo's will say we are all "virtue signalling" because we see them for what they are. Virtue signalling troll language for decent agreement on morality.

Putinbot1 Restricted

The funny thing is unlike most people here; I've experienced Islamic extremism and acts of terrorism firsthand, and I know it's very few Muslims who are like that.

Astner The Ghost Who Walks

Originally posted by Robtard
No, I checked. Still the same, he wanted to incite others to do the same as he did.

But not directly. The problem is that you're counterintuitively focusing on the indirect premeditated outcome of the terrorist, while ignoring the direct premeditated outcome. Excusing me for confusing you for an idiot.

Originally posted by Robtard
So it seems you just want to argue because I somehow hurt your feelings with my comment about my personal choice in not watching the video.

No. My problem is comment "I won't watch the video, don't like to see people being murdered," which implies that generally people who watch the video are psychopaths, which is as stupid as "I won't watch porn, don't like to see women being disrespected," which implies that generally people who watch porn are misogynists.

Originally posted by Robtard
(And if you also believe there are not some people who watch it for sick enjoyment purposes, you've doubly naive. Bye now.)

No, I'm certain that there are ill-willed people who do watch it because they enjoy the prosecution of muslims. Just as I'm certain that there are ill-willed people who enjoy porn for the mistreatment of women. But these are small minorities, and by projecting their countenance on the majority you're just causing more friction.