Christchurch NZ Terror Attacks

Started by Putinbot112 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
My error, the three.

I also suspect they were deeply into youtube, 4chan and online gaming. His manifesto indicates all that.

Back when I used to game online on Xbox, there was no shortage of asperger-y teens and younger guys screaming racism through the microphone with their crackling voices.

Originally posted by Robtard
Back when I used to game online on Xbox, there was no shortage of asperger-y teens and younger guys screaming racism through the microphone with their crackling voices.
the problem is these are easily manipulated people who dont function in the real world, full of hate and crying out to make their mark somehow... Anyhow.

Originally posted by Astner
It takes two to tango, and you're not letting this go.

Again, I don't have a problem with you not watching it. My problem was your demonization of people who did.

Inquisitive people interested in a crime are looking for two things, evidence and juridical hearings. And people don't enjoy it, that's why it's called "stomaching" because you're holding yourself back from hurling up.

Well I'm not saying you enjoy it I was just sort of countering the idea that seeing it makes it more real and gives you an added understanding... I think in reality it can do the opposite because it is presenting something that a human being would usually only ever see in extreme circumstances with real and present danger involved.

In a way these kinds of videos are lacking the crucial emotional context while still having gruesome images in a sort of distant and sterilized presentation. I think it's almost like how watching porn can do more to distort your perception of sex than it does to educate you about sex (analogy, not saying the two are the same kind of content or watched for similar purposes.)

I will say though I definitely know people who do enjoy it and I don't think they are psychopaths either. There's a voyeuristic sort of appeal to seeing tragedy. Sort of like rubbernecking at an accident on the highway.

You admitted to have lost your stomach for snuff films after watching videos recorded under the Saddam regime. So how did you reach the conclusion that people are desensitized by violent videos when your experience is in direct contradiction to that?

In my particular case I was desensitized to a certain extent as the first beheading I ever saw really disturbed me and after seeing enough of them it didn't have the same emotional impact. Basically a case of diminishing returns.

The Hussein video I guess was too far above my sadistic threshold and was ****ed up enough for me to not only not expose myself to it again but also to be uncomfortable with the very idea of me watching that kind of video... Just seems needlessly macabre so I consciously ended it. Had I continued to watch genocide attrocity videos, with enough exposure of course I would become desensitized.

It's like where I work.. at the animal shelter... There's some aspects of that job that can depress you when you first start. After a while you become pretty numb to it cause you're used to it

I notice though you said this interest had something to do with evidence gathering and the like... I don't have any insight on that so that angle didn't even occur to me. If that's your pursuit then I could understand why you watched the video. I would even be interested in hearing what specific insights into the crime watching the video gives you?

Originally posted by Surtur
You seem mad kid. Calm yourself.
Thanking you for protecting us from white genocide is being mad?

New Zealand it appears had lax gun laws.

"The mere fact... that this individual had acquired a gun licence and acquired weapons of that range, then obviously I think people will be seeking change, and I'm committing to that," she told a press conference.

"I can tell you one thing right now - our gun laws will change."

^ Well at least they are wasting no time changing them after a mass shooting like this. Listen and learn America.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Well at least they are wasting no time changing them after a mass shooting like this. Listen and learn America.
👆 Exactly.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Well at least they are wasting no time changing them after a mass shooting like this. Listen and learn America.

Nah I'd rather not let assholes like this control my fellow countrymen posthumously.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Nah I'd rather not let assholes like this control my fellow countrymen posthumously.
kek, and 4chan applauds amirite?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
kek and 4chan applauds amirite?

I've never been on 4chan so I have no idea

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I've never been on 4chan so I have no idea
uh-huh. 🙄

Where do you get your "rare pepy's"...

I honestly think mass shootings are the least compelling reason to have gun control in the US. They're just dramatic so they always spark the argument... But we are going to have a hell of a hard time actually preventing mass shootings via the kinds of gun control the Dems put on the table.

What are you implying?

Edit: That was directed at Putinbot

The guy wanted to divide people. He made sure to name all the right names in his manifesto in order to do it and it seems people are gonna fall for it anyways.

Originally posted by Surtur
The guy wanted to divide people. He made sure to name all the right names in his manifesto in order to do it and it seems people are gonna fall for it anyways.

Considering your reaction in here was to go “but Islam!”, it worked on you then?

Originally posted by Robtard
Considering your reaction in here was to go “but Islam!”, it worked on you then?

Actually this was my first reaction:

Originally posted by Surtur
Me either. RIP.

But since then, people had opened up to whine about incels, etc so my comment wasn't out of place.

I'd say it worked on all of us. Let's continue to fuel it, shall we?