Smaug vs Night King

Started by Josh_Alexander5 pages
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Yall are overhyping the everloving shit outta nightking. Game Of Thrones loses to its superior and predecessor

Your biased opinion is respected.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Your biased opinion is respected.
You are the one biased. We just laugh at you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are the one biased. We just laugh at you.

Arguments > your bias.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Arguments > your bias.
NK missed more than he hit. Only dragon he hit was unaware he was even being attacked. NK was not by himself so the dragons were not just focusing on him. Facts>you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
NK missed more than he hit. Only dragon he hit was unaware he was even being attacked. NK was not by himself so the dragons were not just focusing on him. Facts>you.

Drogon is smaller than Smaug, therefore a harder target to hit. Just need to think man.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Drogon is smaller than Smaug, therefore a harder target to hit. Just need to think man.
He never hit an award dragon. Smaug is more dangerous thus he wins. Your imagination tactics are easy to rape.

Originally posted by quanchi112
NK missed more than he hit. Only dragon he hit was unaware he was even being attacked. NK was not by himself so the dragons were not just focusing on him. Facts>you.

This. Yall are putting nlf on the night king. And giving his spears an autowin against a dragon that is much much much more durable than anything ever even seen in the GOT universe.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He never hit an award dragon. Smaug is more dangerous thus he wins. Your imagination tactics are easy to rape.

Your stupidity is astonishing.

Smaug fires at NK. NK laughs and impales the worm! You've lost.

/thread.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
This. Yall are putting nlf on the night king. And giving his spears an autowin against a dragon that is much much much more durable than anything ever even seen in the GOT universe.

Smaug is big and therefore easier to hit.

Doesn't make him immune to spears that can one shot dragons. Sorry.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Your stupidity is astonishing.

Smaug fires at NK. NK laughs and impales the worm! You've lost.

/thread.

That is not debating it is you stating your imagination. Who cares? Nk missed every time a dragon was aware of him.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Smaug is big and therefore easier to hit.

Doesn't make him immune to spears that can one shot dragons. Sorry.

Not all dragons are created equally. We see the dragons from GoT are physically weaker.

Smaug shit stomps NK.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Smaug is big and therefore easier to hit.

Doesn't make him immune to spears that can one shot dragons. Sorry.

If you think the GoT scorpions would have taken out Smaug, you're going on faulty logic considering what is known. There's a reasons why Bard had to hit the one unprotected spot on Smaug and not just aim for any spot.

YouTube video

Josh used to argue Gregor could best Azog pre amp. The kid is just too biased to be taken seriously.

Smaug.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you think the GoT scorpions would have taken out Smaug, you're going on faulty logic considering what is known. There's a reasons why Bard had to hit the one unprotected spot on Smaug and not just aim for any spot.

The Scorpions of GoT clearly packs a greater punch than Erebor's. And still, an Ice Spear>>>>>>>Black arrow.

Unless you have evidence that Smaug won't suffer Viserion's fate, the fire drake is doomed to failure!

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The Scorpions of GoT clearly packs a greater punch than Erebor's. And still, an Ice Spear>>>>>>>Black arrow.

Unless you have evidence that Smaug won't suffer Viserion's fate, the fire drake is doomed to failure!


Your logic is not logical and here's why:

Smaug tore through the entire Dwarven stronghold and their defenses like it was basically nothing to him, he did this all alone.

You're assuming that a GoT ballista will take out Smaug if it hits him anywhere like it did Rhaegal and you have nothing really to support this, while we have lore on Smaug saying he's virtually impregnable.

Smaug's also considerably larger than Viserian, so even if the ice spear goes into him (which it might not), it's little more than a tiny prick to a creature of his mass/size.

How come Night king gets a no limits fallacy with dragon glass but Smaug does nit with the black arrow? It has to be a black arrow that kills him and nk does not have it

Originally posted by Robtard
Your logic is not logical and here's why:

Smaug tore through the entire Dwarven stronghold and their defenses like it was basically nothing to him, he did this all alone.

You're assuming that a GoT ballista will take out Smaug if it hits him anywhere like it did Rhaegal and you have nothing really to support this, while we have lore on Smaug saying he's virtually impregnable.

Smaug's also considerably larger than Viserian, so even if the ice spear goes into him (which it might not), it's little more than a tiny prick to a creature of his mass/size.

GoT Ballista is CLEARLY bigger and shoots the bolt way faster than Erebor's. Based on that alone, it's safe to assume that GoT's ballista is way more dangerous than Erebor's.

Here are the facts:
- NK's spear one shoted a Dragon! It went right through it's hide like knife through butter.

So, again, what evidence is there that Smaug can withstand it?