Can Superman replicate Helas Mjolnir feat?

Originally posted by h1a8
Because you refuse to restate the statements in your own words. That means you have an ulterior motive and will twist things.

If you have no intention of doing so then simply restate the statements that you want to have a BZ over.

I already posted which of your statements I wanted to BZ, Now. do you accept?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I already posted which of your statements I wanted to BZ, Now. do you accept?

I asked you to restate the statements that you want to have a BZ over.

These are the statements I want to BZ

Originally posted by h1a8
Bifrost was a weak feat (non feat actually).
Slovokia: It appeared to have broken apart mostly, with energy discharge in all directions. The actual pieces of mass didn't protrude outward as such as in a powerful explosion. IM survived it without damage. A non feat.
The heat of a star actually melted it in seconds. Non feat.

Originally posted by h1a8
I didn't fail as I never had to bust them. They were initially unproven claims. Never proven to be significant feats (where a solid steel Mjolnir replica couldn't achieve).

So again what do you want to BZ?
State the official question.

These are the statements I want to BZ

Originally posted by h1a8
Bifrost was a weak feat (non feat actually).
Slovokia: It appeared to have broken apart mostly, with energy discharge in all directions. The actual pieces of mass didn't protrude outward as such as in a powerful explosion. IM survived it without damage. A non feat.
The heat of a star actually melted it in seconds. Non feat.

Originally posted by h1a8
I didn't fail as I never had to bust them. They were initially unproven claims. Never proven to be significant feats (where a solid steel Mjolnir replica couldn't achieve).

Ok so restate the statements you want to BZ (in your own words).

Ok, the following are non feats. Bi-frost, Slovokia and neutron star. plus a steel replica could replicate all the examples.

Now, I've meet all your conditions. do you accept the BZ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Ok, the following are non feats. Bi-frost, Slovokia and neutron star. plus a steel replica could replicate all the examples.

Now, I've meet all your conditions. do you accept the BZ?

Bifrost is a non feat for Mjolnir (opinion). I steel replica could survive without much or any damage (much is an opinion).

Same with Sokovia (IM survived it just fine without much damage and the land mass more or less broke apart).

Uru melted in the star's heat within a few seconds. How's that a feat? Something melting (not resisting being melted) is a failure not a success.

So, do you accept the BZ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
So, do you accept the BZ?

You can't BZ an opinion.

We can possibly BZ something that's not an opinion though.

Sure you can.

Now, do you accept the BZ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Sure you can.

Now, do you accept the BZ?

No you can't.
A good feat to you isn't necessarily a good feat for someone else.
Something not being damaged "much" to you might be damaged "much" to someone else.

Now if I stated that Mjolnir can tank more than 1000 tons of force then that's not an opinion if it can be proven (or supported sufficiently).

That is what the unbiased judges are for.

Do you accept the BZ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
That is what the unbiased judges are for.

Do you accept the BZ?

An opinion = biased
Nothing can be proven objectively

It has to be something specific, based on facts.
Superman can lift more than 10 tons, Thor can survive being being shot from a glock, etc

It's a simple yes or no question, do you accept the Battle Zone?

You must not understand what I said.

Do you accept the Battle Zone?