DarkSaint85
Bonified abstract
Originally posted by -Pr-
This whole "cheese feat" distinction needs to die. It's bollocks.
Pretty much.
Two years ago, I posted:
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
You're not understanding my point.It depends on the number of showings they have, total.
Billy has quite a few showings. So his feats need to be taken into account, more than his fights.
Gladiator does not (relative to Billy). So his fights count for much more than his feats. He is the same like Orion, who has even fewer showings still.
Hulk has TONS of showings. So his fights and feats are all equal(ish) in weighting.
IOW: if a character has very few appearances (LT, In-Betweener, Orion, Galactus) then their fights are a better gauge of their power.
The more showings a character has, and the more they start interacting with other characters, the more their fights get diluted. Lobo is a good example, as are the Lanterns. You yourself acknowledge, in team books Lobo is less impressive. Lanterns are terrible against bricks. That's when their feats become more of a gauge, where writers don't have to dilute them. Batman and Cap are also good examples of this.
The embiggened font is pretty much my summary. We can ague all day about who has more showings and who has less, but we saw this with Damage. When he first arrived, he was the Big Bad, and was collecting feats etc. Then as time went on, and he started meeting more established characters, Poison Ivy took him out...Superman stalemated him....Batman (unprepped) took his hits and only had a broken rib...Congorilla KOd him....random monsters on Monster Island etc etc etc.
Originally posted by Delta1938
Doesn't Shang have chi amping? Where KK just does it 'cuz skill.....and comics.
I count chi amping as a skill.