Originally posted by carver9
Are you sure? Can you show the inside of the planet not being hollow? Example, the planet Bills destroyed is clearly in every perspective a planet by looking at it....https://static1.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11120/111202308/5199437-1.jpg
Can you show me the same?
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
I think its impressive and that they could all break a planet with their legs, but I dont necessarily see Thor ir Surfer doing it as a side effect of flying vecause they dont fly that wayWorldbreaker Hulk shoukd be able to surpass this quite easily.
Thor was hitting Gor in the face cracking nearby planets. He will do just fine.
Originally posted by Magnon
I already answered your question earlier in this thread. Here, in case you've forgotten:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=16911980&highlight=userid%3A137215#post16911980
You also said you cant provide proof. 🙂
Thanks anyways though.
Originally posted by Magnon
There's not enough information in those panels to answer your questions exactly. Pretty much the only thing we can say with absolute certainty is that the planet Superman destroyed was MUCH MORE massive than the asteroid Hulk destroyed.
We have a pretty good idea.
We know it has an escape velocity greater than Earth, because Superman....Well, can't escape.
So it has a massive amount of gravity.
Now, as Carver asserts, it's a small planet. Which, as D =M/V tells us, means that this tiny planet must have a massive density, in order to have enough mass to create a gravitational field strong enough to hold Superman.
Do we all see where I'm getting at? Assuming it's 1/2 Earth size, yet keeping 2x the gravity of Earth, means that the hollow shell (assuming it's hollow) is still incredibly dense, and thus, much more durable than Earth.
Carver cannot have it both ways. The constant is that it's strong enough to keep Superman there. So if it's a small planet, it's super dense and thus, super durable.
Unless he wants to change his tune and claim it's a super large planet, lol.
Wait a sec, this whole thing took place on a planet specifically designed to hold Supes, in a whole pocket universe designed to hold/weaken him, by a virtually omnipotent/omniscient being? That does kinda throw shade on the whole thing depending on what all happened after it. Not on the magnitude of impressiveness, but it does seem like it might bring it more into the realm of an unquantifiable scenereo that's actually showcasing something other than strength or something like that. I haven't read the issue and have no awareness of it outside the threads posted here so it's very possible that none of that is applicable, if so just ignore me.
Lol... it was designed just for him. No sunlight, nothing. Crazy thing is, an untold amount of Supermen died there...
https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/41202046/Screenshot_20190527-160032_Chrome.jpg.html
https://www.turboimagehost.com/p/41202047/Screenshot_20190527-160055_Chrome.jpg.html
It even states it isnt meant to escape. Explains why the guy is struggling.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
We have a pretty good idea.We know it has an escape velocity greater than Earth, because Superman....Well, can't escape.
So it has a massive amount of gravity.
Now, as Carver asserts, it's a small planet. Which, as D =M/V tells us, means that this tiny planet must have a massive density, in order to have enough mass to create a gravitational field strong enough to hold Superman.
Do we all see where I'm getting at? Assuming it's 1/2 Earth size, yet keeping 2x the gravity of Earth, means that the hollow shell (assuming it's hollow) is still incredibly dense, and thus, much more durable than Earth.
Carver cannot have it both ways. The constant is that it's strong enough to keep Superman there. So if it's a small planet, it's super dense and thus, super durable.
Unless he wants to change his tune and claim it's a super large planet, lol.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Yeah it would actually makes more sense for it to be super dense/durable. The reason Jupiter only has two and a half times Earth's gravity despite being much more massive, is because the surface of the planet is so far from the center of the planet. I'm not trying to claim that it's small or anything, but when you're dealing with increased gravity on a planet ultra denseness is a pretty safe bet.
👆
Carver is now in my trap.
Carver, is it a small tiny planet?
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
👆Carver is now in my trap.
Carver, is it a small tiny planet?
What I'm saying is, the planet IS small. He is struggling to escape because he is depleted of power, not fully depleted but just enough for him to not be able to get off said planet. It even states in the same pages that his bones are starving. What I am saying is, 1. The planet is tiny based off what I've seen. 2. Hes struggling to get off said planet due to him being near exhausted and 3. Using a lot of people arguments here, there's no proof the planet was fully destroyed.
#3 can be overlooked.
Originally posted by carver9
What I'm saying is, the planet IS small. He is struggling to escape because he is depleted of power, not fully depleted but just enough for him to not be able to get off said planet. It even states in the same pages that his bones are starving. What I am saying is, 1. The planet is tiny based off what I've seen. 2. Hes struggling to get off said planet due to him being near exhausted and 3. Using a lot of people arguments here, there's no proof the planet was fully destroyed.#3 can be overlooked.
Of course #3 can be overlooked, the text literally says the planet was shattered lmao. As for the other points?
#2? The very first time he tried to escape, he falls back.
So the gravity is already too strong for him. Even before he starts starving.
#1 just means the planet is super durable lmao. If you want to continue to insist it was tiny (and PLANET SIZED, lmao) then it was an incredibly dense (and thus, super durable ) planet.
The size is actually less important. A kg of feathers and a kg of iron....The kg of feathers will occupy a larger space than the kg of iron of course, but shattering a kg ball of iron is way more impressive.
Thanks 🙂
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Of course #3 can be overlooked, the text literally says the planet was shattered lmao. As for the other points?#2? The very first time he tried to escape, he falls back.
So the gravity is already too strong for him. Even before he starts starving.
#1 just means the planet is super durable lmao. If you want to continue to insist it was tiny (and PLANET SIZED, lmao) then it was an incredibly dense (and thus, super durable ) planet.
The size is actually less important. A kg of feathers and a kg of iron....The kg of feathers will occupy a larger space than the kg of iron of course, but shattering a kg ball of iron is way more impressive.
Thanks 🙂
It SAID that it was destroyed just like it SAID Cho punch generated enough Force to take out a universe.
He did fail to escape the planet the first couple of jumps. His last jump basically shows and insist that he put more power into it. Lol.
The gravity wasnt too strong for him, he was just to weak to escape.
I think you're getting the pages mixed up when it mentioned his bones was starving. Reread the book please
