Unemployed, disabled rightist punctures Trump Blimp and is arrested.

Started by Scribble10 pages

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I used them as identifiers no doubt and to troll Surt. I am Gustav Fring.
You could never be as cool as Fring. Nobody could, though.

Originally posted by Scribble
You could never be as cool as Fring. Nobody could, though.
True.

Gus was the true anti-hero of the story. It's good seeing him back in BCS—

Wait, ****, this isn't the OTF

Originally posted by Scribble
You could have just said that maybe you wouldn't use 'disabled' as an insult anymore. Dunno where that 'Hitler' comment came from, kind of bizarre. What we call in le writér's guildè of genius as a "non-sequitur".

You could easily do better, but I can see you won't, so I don't think we have anything else to really discuss right now — unless you want to actually say something.

Okay?

Because Hitler ordered institutionalized and disabled people to be euthanized (ie murdered), that was the connection and exaggeration I was making...

Bye Felicia.

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay?

Because Hitler ordered institutionalized and disabled people to be euthanized (ie murdered), that was the connection and exaggeration I was making...

Bye Felicia.

It was a non-sequitur because I didn't at any point imply I saw you in that way, or to that degree. You could have just admitted that using 'disabled' in a derogatory manner isn't exactly a great look — instead you gave us a knee-jerk cliche (a nice Godwin's Law, to boot), and a sign that you don't have anything intelligent to offer in this conversation, other than referencing history that everyone here already knows.

I don't know what is happening but it feels like Scribs is laying down some smacks.

Eugenics, Nazism, Godwin's Law, disabled people: oh my.

Originally posted by Scribble
It was a non-sequitur because I didn't at any point imply I saw you in that way, or to that degree. You could have just admitted that using 'disabled' in a derogatory manner isn't exactly a great look — instead you gave us a knee-jerk cliche (a nice Godwin's Law, to boot), and a sign that you don't have anything intelligent to offer in this conversation, other than referencing history that everyone here already knows.
Didn't you say you were done?

You either didn't know history or your reading comprehension is shit, m8. I clearly didn't say or imply that you said, I said "I will add", meaning that bit's coming from me. Off to literacy school with you.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't know what is happening but it feels like Scribs is laying down some smacks.

Eugenics, Nazism, Godwin's Law, disabled people: oh my.

The tl;dr version:

-I hate the disabled
-Whirly isn't part of the solution, he's part of the problem
-Scribs is woke AF

So you knew already

Originally posted by Robtard
Didn't you say you were done?

You either didn't know history or your reading comprehension is shit, m8. I clearly didn't say or imply that you said, I said "I will add", meaning that bit's coming from me. Off to literacy school with you.

Sure, but I had more to say. I'm not gonna defend going back on saying I'm leaving, because there's nothing wrong with dipping out for a bit and coming back in.

Also lol, this whole post is just a bunch of insults. It's weird seeing you get so amped-up and aggressive, you usually just slouch-flame your way through debates with your homies by your side.

Anyway, everyone knows what Hitler did in WWII, I don't think I really need to defend my integrity in knowing basic history. I already explained what I meant, so if you're choosing not to believe me, that's your bag. I try hard not to be dishonest, so I'm standing by what I said I meant. Like I say — believe it, or don't.

"He mad". Coolio.

You already used that one on me, chuck. Don't act like it's anything new — but clearly you're happy to use it as an excuse to weasel out of this. So, do it, I guess.

I'm not the best at keeping up with the 20-something redpill lingo, but I don't know "chuck". Are you just calling me the name or does it have meaning behind it?

😂 At people here claiming they have never made fun of disabled people😂

Post history proves otherwise

Originally posted by Scribble
You could never be as cool as Fring. Nobody could, though.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
True.

Who?

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm not the best at keeping up with the 20-something redpill lingo, but I don't know "chuck". Are you just calling me the name or does it have meaning behind it?
First off, I'm going to briefly touch on the fact that you replied with just another weird non-sequitur that is devoid of anything fresh, informative or reasoned.

I used "chuck" because it's funny. I'm not a redpiller (although you know that, you just posted what you did because you're an intellectual fraud and coward faced with a clear example of your own hypocrisy) — I'm pretty clear of my distaste for Sargon 'Rapeman' of Akkad, Tommy Stephen Yaxley-Lennon Robinson, etc., i.e. classic alt-right types.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
😂 At people here claiming they have never made fun of disabled people😂

Post history proves otherwise

His username is literally "Robtard", which is, itself, a reference to an ableist slur. It's like me calling myself Scrigger or Scraggot something, but with less subtlety. The idea that Rob or any of his cabal see disabled people as anything more than a punchline is yet to be seen.

My cabal now? Hating disabled people? 😂

Dude, just listen to yourself. You took something that was a 2 and you turned it all the way to eleven.

Don't take this as an insult or me being dismissive: but I do think you need to take a step back and chill out.

I don't think you hate them — I just don't think you have any respect for them, which is clearly reflected in how you discuss disability, and use ableist slurs.

Originally posted by Robtard
Don't take this as an insult or me being dismissive: but I do think you need to take a step back and chill out.
Originally posted by Robtard
"He mad". Coolio.
Originally posted by Scribble
I don't think you hate them — I just don't think you have any respect for them, which is clearly reflected in how you discuss disability, and use ableist slurs.

That's not true at all, but I can't convince you otherwise.