Originally posted by RobtardSo it comes down to perspective, really. Like I say, my general assumption is that based on the meds Surtur takes, he's likely someone who shouldn't be forced to work. Thus, I find this thread and its contents in opposition to your constantly signaled 'tolerant' perspective. It debases disability to a point of mockery and insult, used alongside other slurs such as 'loony' (also ableist, come to think of it) and 'unemployed'. But the real bad is that the person in question (the woman who popped the baby in this context) is right-wing — so you'll happily use such words as pejoratives because they're someone you disagree with.
It varies, he's said he is and said he isn't.I figured you'd take the 'mother' comment that way, but that wasn't it at all, so meh.
I don't really care about the disability stuff specifically, like I've been saying I'm really not emotionally invested in the topic itself (I'm rarely emotionally invested in anything anymore), and generally I'm of an anti-SJW mindset (which I've shown multiple times) — I just find it interesting the way that you have certain rules for one group, but not others. You've explained some of it, which I accept wholeheartedly — but some of it just doesn't really slide with me, and seems more like backtracking than anything.