War With Iran

Started by Surtur28 pages

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Iran is so out of control they can’t even have a funeral where they kill their own people

https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/us-iran-soleimani-tensions-intl-01-07-20/h_89f662ceb39322a343315d255f230b44

Did u see this:

https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1214150714261413889

And yes, we had a WaPo national security reporter retweeting a tweet comparing the funeral crowds for this guy to Trumps inauguration crowds. Showing the media is the enemy.

Of course, Trump was responsible for both crowds 🙂

Lololol

Obama’s DHS Secretary Debunks Dems’ Claim Trump Didn’t Have Authority To Kill Soleimani; Now He’s Under Fire From Left

Love seeing them eat their own.

Hey I'm sure Kim Jong II's funeral was composed of nothing but willing attendee's too!

Originally posted by Surtur
I missed the part of your article that concretely proves they are lying here. Copy and paste it for me.

You're never going to be able to touch, feel, taste, etc concrete proof, Surt. You know that. But it's fishy as fu#k and super convenient with Trump in the middle of an impeachment. Funny no one's talking about impeachment anymore. And as usual the most transparent administration ever is being super secretive.

But I'll humor you. Though you should read the whole article.

The Trump administration felt compelled to justify its extraordinary measure by invoking extraordinary circumstances. Officially, the president did not order the assassination of a foreign official to exact retribution for past attacks on U.S. soldiers, or deter Iranian aggression in the region in some generalized sense. Rather, according to the White House, the United States dropped several missiles on the Iranian commander because doing so was the only possible means of averting an “imminent” attack on Americans abroad.

This “imminent” attack would have transpired in a matter of “days” and/or “weeks,” and killed “dozens if not hundreds” of Americans, along with some unspecified number of Europeans. The intelligence informing these assessments is “clear and unambiguous” (but the supposedly sovereign public of our great democracy is not allowed to see it).

There is, of course, precedence for Republican administrations launching Middle Eastern wars on the basis of lies. But historically, such administrations have felt compelled to keep up the pretense of democratic accountability. George W. Bush & Co. put in the effort to fabricate a logically coherent casus belli for Iraq and manufacture intelligence backing up their mendacious claims. The Trump White House, by contrast, has not even done voters the courtesy of pretending to believe that they are entitled to a facially plausible narrative — or evidence of any kind — before their government launches wars in their name.

Senate Democrats have asked the administration to declassify the rationale for the Soleimani killing that it had provided to Congress. “It is critical that national security matters of such import be shared with the American people in a timely manner,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Bob Menendez wrote in a letter. “An entirely classified notification is simply not appropriate in a democratic society, and there appears to be no legitimate justification for classifying this notification.”

There does, however, appear to be an illegitimate one. Contrary to the claims made by Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Mark A. Milley, the classified intelligence supporting the administration’s case is neither “clear” nor “unambiguous,” according to just about every official and lawmaker who’s been made privy to it. From the Washington Post:

Lawmakers left classified briefings with U.S. intelligence officials on Friday saying they heard nothing to suggest that the threat posed by the proxy forces guided by Soleimani had changed substantially in recent months.

… Some defense officials said Pompeo’s claims of an imminent and direct threat were overstated, and they would prefer that he make the case based on the killing of the American contractor and previous Iranian provocations.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
You're never going to be able to touch, feel, taste, etc concrete proof, Surt. You know that. But it's fishy as fu#k and super convenient with Trump in the middle of an impeachment. Funny no one's talking about impeachment anymore. And as usual the most transparent administration ever is being super secretive.

But I'll humor you. Though you should read the whole article.

Why would anyone continue on the impeachment train when any facts to be reported now are few and far between? Those news lines aren't going to sell any more tickets until Pelosi decides to move forward to the Senate.

I'm not dismissing Trumps actions but I'm also not giving news outlets a pass on letting impeachment fall from their headlines as well.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Iran is so out of control they can’t even have a funeral where they kill their own people

https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/us-iran-soleimani-tensions-intl-01-07-20/h_89f662ceb39322a343315d255f230b44

Savages. We should just Nuke them

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Iranian scum.

Yeah you sound like a proper nice and not at all racist guy.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Killing him failed to make America safer, while causing a diplomatic nightmare in one of our closest allies in the region now wanting us to get the **** out.

Oh man, you're absolutely right. Preach it, brother.

Which Americans were killed by the Iranian Regime due to this? Which of our allies were killed by the Iranian Regime due to this?

There's just so many. I don't have google handy. Can you help me with this? Which ones?

So many to choose from so it should be easy to help me out with this, right?

So many.

So so many.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Despite what democrats and idiots in the MSM say, Trump made the world a safer place by ridding it of that Iranian scum.

See below:

Originally posted by Tzeentch
If Iran had the capability of killing "hundreds of americans" then they're going to do it regardless of whether Suleimani is alive or dead. So explain to me what Trump accomplished with the attack.

Other than angering a country that already doesn't like us, he pissed off the usual crowd and got a couple of famous people to reveal to the world that they're cowards.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Other than angering a country that already doesn't like us, he pissed off the usual crowd and got a couple of famous people to reveal to the world that they're cowards.

To be fair, he angered the oppressive and violent regime. Whoops, forgot to mention, anti-Semitic Regime.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah you sound like a proper nice and not at all racist guy.
clue: He really doesn't

Originally posted by dadudemon
Oh man, you're absolutely right. Preach it, brother.

Which Americans were killed by the Iranian Regime due to this? Which of our allies were killed by the Iranian Regime due to this?

There's just so many. I don't have google handy. Can you help me with this? Which ones?

So many to choose from so it should be easy to help me out with this, right?

So many.

So so many.

Inshallah brother, the time is now.

Hint: Iran would not engage in a conventional war with the USA, neither china nor russia will back them since its far to visible for a proxy war and iran doesn't have the resources.

Expect asymmetrical attacks and the typical terrorist style attacks, not open conventional wwiii. Silly media and those propogating such nonsense.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
At this point what difference does it make

😆 😆

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Yeah you sound like a proper nice and not at all racist guy.

Awww, I've offended you by talking bad about a piece of sh*t who was responsible for thousands of innocent deaths and was planning to kill many more. My apologies, I guess you're still in mourning over that p-o-s being dead.

Indeed, I am a nice guy, at least to people who're nice to me. And nope, I'm not racist but believe whatever you like. The fact is Iranians frequently chant "Death to America!" so no, I have no sympathy for scumbags who do that and live in a country that is the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism and is responsible for many American deaths. It has nothing to do with their "race" or the color of their skin, moron. If what I said hurts your fragile wittle fee fees, too bad snowflake. I don't give a sh*t.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Inshallah brother, the time is now.

Enchilada to you, too. And the time, now, is 13:11 Central Time.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Awww, I've offended you by talking bad about a piece of sh*t who was responsible for thousands of innocent deaths and was planning to kill many more. My apologies, I guess you're still in mourning over that p-o-s being dead.

Indeed, I am a nice guy, at least to people who're nice to me. And nope, I'm not racist but believe whatever you like. The fact is Iranians frequently chant "Death to America!" so no, I have no sympathy for scumbags who do that and live in a country that is the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism and is responsible for many American deaths. It has nothing to do with their "race" or the color of their skin, moron. If what I said hurts your fragile wittle fee fees, too bad snowflake. I don't give a sh*t.

Not to break apart your racism filled rants, Star/fly, but Saudi Arabia is the world's "biggest sponsor of terrorism", or at least certainly greater than Iran in that manner. YW.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not to break apart your racism filled rants, Star/fly, but Saudi Arabia is the world's "biggest sponsor of terrorism", or at least certainly greater than Iran in that manner. YW.

Why aren't we waging war with SA?

Not that I want us to. We shouldn't. I don't want wars with anyone. But if our reasons for warring are terrorism, you'd think SA would be an important target.

Cos $$$

Even Trump who was supposed to be the "bull in the china shop" type of guy, still curtsied to the King of the KSA.