War With Iran

Started by Robtard28 pages

Trump today: 'Iran will not get nuclear weapons under my watch!'

Iran today: 'Yeah, that was the deal we had until you broke it.'

Who voted/supports this jabroni. SMH.

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump today: 'Iran will not get nuclear weapons under my watch!'

Iran today: 'Yeah, that was the deal we had until you broke it.'

Who voted/supports this jabroni. SMH.

😆

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump today: 'Iran will not get nuclear weapons under my watch!'

Iran today: 'Yeah, that was the deal we had until you broke it.'

Who voted/supports this jabroni. SMH.

Calm down.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
😆

Reality: Iran would never nuke Israel and/or the KSA, that's a no-win scenario for them, as it would mean they get bombed into shit and then invaded.

But here we have Trump tying to not only fix a problem he created by breaking the Iran nuclear deal, but also whipping up fears because his acolytes fall for it every time.

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump today: 'Iran will not get nuclear weapons under my watch!'

Iran today: 'Yeah, that was the deal we had until you broke it.'

Who voted/supports this jabroni. SMH.

You're even more naive than I already thought you were if you thought Iran wasn't still trying to develop a nuclear weapon under that BS garbage agreement Obama made with them lol.

You're such a sheep, rob.

Originally posted by Surtur
There are some morons in America who think WW3 is gonna happen, but most rational people here don't believe that.

Indeed:

*snort*

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump needed a distraction from his shitshow and his impeachment, he asked for ideas, someone in his admin (Pompeo?) pointed to Iran and Soleimani and Trump said "good."
That was one of the best House of Cards episodes.

Originally posted by Robtard
Indeed:

*snort*

This ain't the win you think it is, shows those squawking about WW3 are no better than Trump himself.

It's good that no one was hurt in the Iranian strike but we shouldn't let our guard down. Iran may be planning more attacks... perhaps not against our military which they could never actually defeat but against soft targets in our cities using terrorist sleeper cells.. The way the dead commander's daughter was talking we should be expecting a lot more from Iran. If we let our guard down that's when we are most vulnerable.

Originally posted by Surtur
This ain't the win you think it is, shows those squawking about WW3 are no better than Trump himself.

If by 'win' you mean that it shows you think Trump is a "moron", then an A-bomb just dropped.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
That was one of the best House of Cards episodes.

Oh yeah.

Just sad we're living it here.

Rob why are you so afraid

Originally posted by Robtard
Reality: Iran would never nuke Israel

People forget Jerusalem is a holy place for Muslims as well, plus the after effects would surely effect the Palestinians as well, so no Iran wouldnt nuke Israel lol

Originally posted by Darth Thor
People forget Jerusalem is a holy place for Muslims as well, plus the after effects would surely effect the Palestinians as well, so no Iran wouldnt nuke Israel lol
Ask most of them who Saladin is and they won't have a clue.

You have to appreciate the sheer insanity of TDS. The same people who whined that Trump retaliated against Iran over an attack that killed an American are now running their mouths over him not retaliating over an attack that killed no Americans.

Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Ilhan Omar is accusing him of trying to starve the Iranian people with sanctions so I guess those are wrong too so basically we can't do anything but cuck to Iranian aggression and when it comes to deranged lefties here they will support the opposite of whatever action trump takes lol. We've seen that by the sudden shift from dinging Trump for an attack to dinging for a lack of one. But remember they were super alarmed over a potential WW3 lol.

Oh and btw, ilhan omar supports BDS, but whines about sanctions on Iran.

^ What Iranian aggression are you referring to Surt? Not saying theyre saints, but just curious why we have to do something.

Perhaps aggression like attacking our embassy and murdering a US contractor from California? You know, the aggression folk whined we responded over?

Originally posted by Surtur
Perhaps aggression like attacking our embassy and murdering a US contractor from California? You know, the aggression folk whined we responded over?

You mean this:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-09/sacramento-contractor-whose-death-sparked-iran-us-conflict-mourned?_amp=true

U.S. already responded on the group they thought did it and killed 25 and wounded 51 others.. Was that not enough of a retaliation for 1 man killed?

Also which embassy attack are you referring to?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You mean this:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-09/sacramento-contractor-whose-death-sparked-iran-us-conflict-mourned?_amp=true

U.S. already responded on the group they thought did it and killed 25 and wounded 51 others.. Was that not enough of a retaliation for 1 man killed?

Also which embassy attack are you referring to?

That's just another bombing and killing of rando terrorist though, that doesn't make the headlines and cause a deflection like killing a figurehead does. Clinton tried similar during his impeachment and no one really cared or fell for it. Reagan invaded Grenada to deflect away from the Iran-Contra scandal, again, only mild success.

Even some Republicans are not buying the reasoning Trump/Admin gave in attacking Soleimani specifically that day and are being vocal about it. Pompeo was put on the spot when he regurgitated the "imminent threat" to Americans excuse, when asked what kind of timeline that meant and he danced around it.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You mean this:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-09/sacramento-contractor-whose-death-sparked-iran-us-conflict-mourned?_amp=true

U.S. already responded on the group they thought did it and killed 25 and wounded 51 others.. Was that not enough of a retaliation for 1 man killed?

Also which embassy attack are you referring to?

You seem to think I'm saying I want them to do more. I'm not, I'm merely pointing out when we had an embassy attack where 1 guy died(you just linked to it) and trump retaliated people dinged him for doing so. Then trump told iran if they do anything else they will regret it. Then they do something and it results in minimal damage and zero deaths so trump says fine I won't do anything else it ends here you didn't us basically no harm. Now the narrative is "trump has made us look weak". It's crazy.

You see certain people here were expecting dead troops and hoping to exploit them to go after trump and it didn't pan out so now you have the narrative I just told you about.