War With Iran

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Actually seems like youre avoiding discussing it. Perhaps because youre having a hard time justifying your stance.

And im pretty sure I addressed Your question.

But it seems youre only willing to debate if I start the conversation off accepting the guy was a random terrorist and not a state military official. A bad state, sure.. But still a state with heavy influence around the world, and whose people we were not actually at war with.

I will discuss it: please give me the number of americans who would need to die before it's justified. Provide a number in your next response or we're moving on.

And no , he wasn't a random terrorist, but he *was* a terrorist.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did Surt lie and the contractor that was killed wasn't part of the embassy attack?

This guy seems to have been killed in an attack on a military base:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/contractor-whose-death-trump-cites-was-a-naturalized-us-citizen-born-in-iraq/2020/01/07/afa7e774-31ac-11ea-91fd-82d4e04a3fac_story.html?outputType=amp

Is there another contractor guy? And why not just answer if there is?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
This guy seems to have been killed in an attack on a military base:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/contractor-whose-death-trump-cites-was-a-naturalized-us-citizen-born-in-iraq/2020/01/07/afa7e774-31ac-11ea-91fd-82d4e04a3fac_story.html?outputType=amp

Is there another contractor guy? And why not just answer if there is?

No, that's the same guy "Nawres Hamid" he mentioned to me as dying in the embassy attack.

I blame myself for taking Surt at his word and not looking into it further, he's a known liar.

Originally posted by Surtur
I will discuss it: please give me the number of americans who would need to die before it's justified. Provide a number in your next response or we're moving on.

And no , he wasn't a random terrorist, but he *was* a terrorist.

We’ll surely it Depends how they die?

So answer Was the above the guy youre taking about above?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
We’ll surely it Depends how they die?

So answer Was the above the guy youre taking about above?

Okay no number, moving on.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, that's the same guy "Nawres Hamid" he mentioned to me as dying in the embassy attack.

I blame myself for taking Surt at his word and not looking into it further, he's a known liar.

And hes like legit making out I was the one trolling lol

Lol I'd watch your mouth when it comes to calling others a liar Rob. Pot kettle and all that.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And hes like legit making out I was the one trolling lol

Even some Republicans are saying the reasons Trump's Admin gave make no sense.

They killed an American. So leftist trash: how many should they be allowed to kill?

Give a number.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I'd watch your mouth when it comes to calling others a liar Rob. Pot kettle and all that.

You just got caught in another blatant lie.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just got caught in another blatant lie.

No I didn't. Do better.

Originally posted by Surtur
They killed an American. So leftist trash: how many should they be allowed to kill?

Give a number.

You said the reason for killing Soleimaniwas because they killed people in the embassy attack. There were zero deaths in that attack, despite your ruse.

Originally posted by Robtard
You said the reason for killing Soleimaniwas because they killed people in the embassy attack. There were zero deaths in that attack, despite your ruse.

You're correct I mistaken the reason we killed him is cuz an american was killed in a different attack and then they attacked again and then were planning more attacks.

So still justified, and you're still trash if you're against it.

Originally posted by Surtur
No I didn't. Do better.

Where was Nawres Hamid killed then? You said it was the embassy.

Originally posted by Robtard
Where was Nawres Hamid killed then? You said it was the embassy.

Kiddo, I did mistake when Iran killed him. But I didn't lie. So I'd advise moving on from this narrative 👆

Originally posted by Robtard
So if zero deaths meant we should attack and kill Iranians over the embassy attack, why did Trump not attack after the last two attacks which also netted zero deaths?

Even some Republicans are saying the reasons Trump's Admin gave make no sense.

I mean jeez imagine a handful of soldiers were killed in an attack on a military base? What would be the appropriate response then? Assassinate the entire government? Oh and lets not forget this was a proxy group who carried out the attack, which we already retaliated heavily on. (I keep saying WE but im British).

Have to say though its nice at least Surt is sticking up for the death of a brown Arab American. That is some kind of progress.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I mean jeez imagine a handful of soldiers were killed in an attack on a military base? What would be the appropriate response then? Assassinate the entire government? Oh and lets not forget this was a proxy group who carried out the attack, which we already retaliated heavily on. (I keep saying WE but im British).

Have to say though its nice at least Surt is sticking up for a brown Arab American. That is some kind of progress.

Yeah stop saying we, you're not on our side. You established that the moment you balked at calling this guy a terrorist.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're correct I mistaken the reason we killed him is cuz an american was killed in a different attack and then they attacked again and then were planning more attacks.

So still justified, and you're still trash if you're against it.

Problem is Surt, youre claiming it was an honest mistake. But If it was a mistake you would have answered me when I was trying to get to the bottom of it instead of accusing me of trolling and telling me to move on.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Problem is Surt, youre claiming it was an honest mistake. But If it was a mistake you would have answered me when I was trying to get to the bottom of it instead of accusing me of trolling and telling me to move on.

Cuz u came off like a gas lighting little troll, but hey assume bad faith if you need to I will allow it.

But I have admitted he was murdered by Iran elsewhere, so we could move on but hey if you wanna continue on it okay we can squabble some more about when Iran murdered him. You want to? Did you wanna argue it's more justified to kill someone on a base or something? Go for it. Make the argument now please.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah stop saying we, you're not on our side. You established that the moment you balked at calling this guy a terrorist.

No ive asked you to justify to me how and why a government official is a terrorist, which you refuse to discuss.

You see Surt this is called having a closed mind. When you have pre-conditions and conceptions people must accept before they can even enter a discussion with you.

Terrorists (as far as I understand) are rogue groups who specifically target innocent civilians to put terror into them.

And sure yeah im not on your side, or on Robs side, or on the Ayatollahs side. Its about right and wrong.

And Not about sticking by your family or tribe even if theyre beating on an old grandma.