Alex Jones sent child porn to Sandy Hook victims

Originally posted by Robtard
Dude, you got a measly temp ban for acting foolish, immediately made a sock account to rant about being banned and shitting on the mods, yet your main account was allowed back.

If anything, you might have special protected status. If I did that, good bye Robtard maybe.

You are not coming up with things I did that others got banned for lol.

Give a specific situation, you *do* claim to have a legendary memory.

well look who's playing the victim again eat

My bad, truth bothers you.

The mods are totally neutral, we can move on in order to spare your feelings 🙂

Originally posted by Surtur
You are not coming up with things I did that others got banned for lol.

Give a specific situation, you *do* claim to have a legendary memory.

I literally just named it in the post you quoted...

ie getting a temp ban, and socking to continue talking shit, that has resulted in the main account being perma-banned when the temp ban wears off.

Originally posted by Robtard
I literally just named it in the post you quoted...

ie getting a temp ban, and socking to continue talking shit, that has resulted in the main account being perma-banned when the temp ban wears off.

For which posters? Name who it was that got this different treatment from me.

EDIT: I gotta say, it's a good thing you claimed legendary memory so many times. Otherwise it'd be unreasonable to ask you 🙂

scribble for one

Originally posted by Surtur
For which posters? Name who it was that got this different treatment from me.

EDIT: I gotta say, it's a good thing you claimed legendary memory so many times. Otherwise it'd be unreasonable to ask you 🙂

Off the top of my head and people who'd know, Whirly and your two buddies XYZ and Ziggy 🙂

But "Perma banned for socking in order to avoid temp ban" has happened many times. Ask Bada.

is all this because the mods won't ban whirly on surt's implied request?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
is all this because the mods won't ban whirly on surt's implied request?

Seems so.

Originally posted by Robtard
Off the top of my head and people who'd know, Whirly and your two buddies XYZ and Ziggy 🙂

But "Perma banned for socking in order to avoid temp ban" has happened many times. Ask Bada.

The difference is they've socked multiple times, that is why they get banned.

I await you to give an actual valid comparison 🙂

Lol, goal post moved.

But okay, Surt, you're a victim, and the evil Mods have it out for you, you're special that way. IT'S. NOT. YOUR. FAULT.

Happy?

scribble got banned for socking once to avoid the ban, exactly as you did, and got permad. several others. walshy too, iirc. they may be welcome here now, but like your friend TI, they were previously unwelcome here. Now try to stop crying

I never moved the goal post. I asked you to show people who got different treatment than me. People banned for multiple socks do not fit into the category.

And why do I have to be a "victim" in order to acknowledge this? Lol.

I don't think the mods are evil, just bias.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
scribble got banned for socking once to avoid the ban, exactly as you did, and got permad. several others. walshy too, iirc. they may be welcome here now, but like your friend TI, they were previously unwelcome here. Now try to stop crying

Prove it, when did this happen? It better have been within the last few years.

I'm not interested in playing your game. nobody's getting banned on your whim. Get over it and be a big boy

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I'm not interested in playing your game. nobody's getting banned on your whim. Get over it and be a big boy

But you are interested because you responded and tried to defend it lol.

And it's clear you can't adequately defend it. Moving on.

I tried to defend what exactly? I'm losing track of all your strawmen. long day

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I tried to defend what exactly? I'm losing track of all your strawmen. long day

You tried to say there was no bias cuz Scrib was banned for socking.

Thing is, in the last few years the mods have admitted to getting lax on the rules. And have looked away from many socks.

So if what you're describing is from 4-5 years ago, it's not valid.

So...when did the events you describe happen?

You've been given five names of people you'd recognize and I've advised you to PM Bada and ask him directly, cos he's done it multiple times for that exact reason.

So ya, you're playing games to push the victim mentality.

You have not given a recent example. I have asked and not been provided.

We can move on, we can accept the bias. It's okay, humans are bias.