Alex Jones sent child porn to Sandy Hook victims

Started by Robtard13 pages

You're acting like a baby right now, buddy.

You repeatedly make claims without backing it up. This is fact. This was a banworthy offense. You have been given special treatment. These are the facts, do with them what you will 🙂

You've repeatedly ignored evidence.

But let's just go with you being a victim, I find it silly, but if that works for you and in hindsight, what do I care.

I specifically asked for dates(which are relevant and you know it) you gave none.

So again: you have been allowed to behave in a way others have not. This is not to be disputed.

The globals should ban people for just one day, completely random, no wrongdoing, with the reason: "felt like it". That would maybe put things into proper perspective and end all the whining

Originally posted by Surtur
I specifically asked for dates(which are relevant and you know it) you gave none.

So again: you have been allowed to behave in a way others have not. This is not to be disputed.

Now you're changing the narrative.

I noted that we've both been allowed to behave in manners others were penalized, a lot of people have in fact. So neither of us is really special.

But if you also want to add "and Robtard has special status" to "Surt is a victim", cool with me as well.

Originally posted by Robtard
Now you're changing the narrative.

I noted that we've both been allowed to behave in manners others were penalized, a lot of people have in fact. So neither of us is really special.

But if you also want to add "and Robtard has special status" to "Surt is a victim", cool with me as well.

You've repeatedly been allowed to behave in a way that I was penalized for. Repeatedly. You have not found an equivalent for me lol. And since you refuse to provide the circumstances, I'll just say Scrib not getting away with it *once* doesn't compare to the many many times you have.

I want exact circumstances. I want an example of me being able to engage in a behavior many times over with zero consequences, while another gets penalized lol. Show me that. If you can't do so? Move on.

Now you've completely lost it, I have never socked, which means I have never socked to avoid a temp ban (you have and faced zero consequences).

"Robtard" is my first and only account. Can't perfect perfection. This is a fact; you're just going to have to deal with it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Now you've completely lost it, I have never socked, which means I have never socked to avoid a temp ban (you have and faced zero consequences).

"Robtard" is my first and only account. Can't perfect perfection. This is a fact; you're just going to have to deal with it.

I never said you socked, I wasn't punished for being a sock lol. The mod legit said I was banned cuz I called him a hypocrite and didn't back it up.

That was why, it wasn't for insulting him, etc

You implied it when you did the comparison.

Exactly though, you socked to avoid a temp ban and talk shit and you got a free pass. That kinda sounds more like "special status" more-so than anything else.

Originally posted by Robtard
You implied it when you did the comparison.

Exactly though, you socked to avoid a temp ban and talk shit and you got a free pass. That kinda sounds more like "special status" more-so than anything else.

In the last couple years socking has been allowed unless it goes overboard. I did not go overboard, and you have not proven Scrib did it recently during the period where the mods gave up enforcing the sock rule unless it got out of hand.

The issue here is you are allowed to continually make claims without backing it up. As are your pals lol.

how old are you?

^Has no valid response for my facts 🙂

they're not facts. You deliberately had multiple simultaneously active accounts. that's what socking means. (that and socking to avoid banning, which you also did)

Surt, in all the years I’ve been here I’ve received a single 2day ban and admittedly I was told it was coming yet I pushed it because I felt I was in the right.

I went completely unbanned even during the 5ish year period when some mods were banning people for the most minor of infractions.

Do you think this is possible simply because I know how to act to not get banned instead of having some “super special protected status”?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
is all this because the mods won't ban whirly on surt's implied request?
Surt does seem obsessed with seeing me banned. Poor guy, the mods here are bright guys and no one's puppet. His backseat modding and accusations I've socked recently are groundless and sadly bitter. It all would be so much less important to him if this forum were not all he had. He needs to chillax.

If the moderation is so damn unfair, then why are you here? Either stop posting or learn to deal with it. Just stop complaining about it, because you sound like a little ass boy.

IOW, just your type.

😈

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, just your type.

😈

I am not Alex Jones.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I am not Alex Jones.
post of the month 👆