Alex Jones sent child porn to Sandy Hook victims

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Nice gaslighting. 😉

Here's the definition of gaslighting:

"manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity."

Is what I did gaslighitng?

hmm

Here, I'll not be a coward like DIjkdlfjsdfIDIDFIF is. I'll better explain my position.

When Obama voters were confronted with things Obama actually did, in 2012, which included a laundry list of heinous things that the standard Democrat should vehemently opposed, they still supported Obama. Here's the catch: those actions were presented to the Obama voters as things Romney did, said, or voted for. After it was revealed that these were all things Obama did, the Obama voters, almost universally, stated they would still vote for Obama in 2012.

It gets better: when these same people were presented with things Romney said or did, but they were told it was what Obama said or did, these voters liked those actions and quotes very much because they thought Obama did it. When it was revealed that it was Romney, not Obama, they did not switch their choice: they still stuck with Obama.

It gets better: a similar thought experiment was done with Trump's new tax plan.

Leftist morons were presented with "Bernie Sanders' tax plan", but it was actually Trump's tax plan, and asked if they liked the details. They did. When it was revealed that it wasn't Sanders' plan, but Trump's, the collective pants shitting was hilarious. Guess what? The anti-Turmptards still doubled down on their Trump Derangement Syndrome.

And there are tens of millions of people like that, right now, in the US. So many people suffering from Democrat-induced-propaganda fueled by the big-media hate machine. 🙂

Whirly my aloe plant is also available to you if you need it.

Originally posted by Surtur
They'd only stop if it bore no fruit. They'd never stop due to exposure. Not unless the CIA itself was dismantled.

Rationalwiki had an.... interesting conversation about the topic, in the "wiki changes" area.

Some of the more vocal members were pooh poohing the concept that it was only about LSD. One claimed it was about much more then that, and that we learned a lot.

Never mind the fact this data gathering was completely without the consent of those being studied, but to make such statements that these studies were a net positive, says a lot about the speaker. He's probably one of those "Science justifies anything" sorts, even if talking about irradiating consciousness objectors, or unsuspecting towns (All of which has happened).

Originally posted by dadudemon
Here's the definition of gaslighting:

"manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity."

Is what I did gaslighitng?

hmm

Here, I'll not be a coward like DIjkdlfjsdfIDIDFIF is. I'll better explain my position.

When Obama voters were confronted with things Obama actually did, in 2012, which included a laundry list of heinous things that the standard Democrat should vehemently opposed, they still supported Obama. Here's the catch: those actions were presented to the Obama voters as things Romney did, said, or voted for. After it was revealed that these were all things Obama did, the Obama voters, almost universally, stated they would still vote for Obama in 2012.

It gets better: when these same people were presented with things Romney said or did, but they were told it was what Obama said or did, these voters liked those actions and quotes very much because they thought Obama did it. When it was revealed that it was Romney, not Obama, they did not switch their choice: they still stuck with Obama.

It gets better: a similar thought experiment was done with Trump's new tax plan.

Leftist morons were presented with "Bernie Sanders' tax plan", but it was actually Trump's tax plan, and asked if they liked the details. They did. When it was revealed that it wasn't Sanders' plan, but Trump's, the collective pants shitting was hilarious. Guess what? The anti-Turmptards still doubled down on their Trump Derangement Syndrome.

And there are tens of millions of people like that, right now, in the US. So many people suffering from Democrat-induced-propaganda fueled by the big-media hate machine. 🙂

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, gaslighting involves attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim's belief.[1][2]

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term originated from the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gaslight and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations, in which the gas-fueled lights in a character's home are dimmed when he turns the attic lights brighter while he searches the attic at night. He convinces his wife that she is imagining the change. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4] as well as in political commentary.[5][6]

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yeah, some of the Trumpers are fanatical. Around .001% of them.

If the CIA wants a better sample pool, they should look at about 20% of American leftists and Democrats. Much better examples of people who fall in line with directions and orders than Trumpers.

Disagreed. It's easily 30%. They believe every lie and outrageous claim.

Disagreed. See above.

Originally posted by Surtur
Rob I got some aloe if you need it.

^Classic Cheerleading

Originally posted by Robtard
^Classic Cheerleading

More irony overload lol. Good stuff, keep it up.

^ Textbook triggerdom

Originally posted by Robtard
Disagreed. It's easily 30%. They believe every lie and outrageous claim.

You're right: it's 30% of the lefties and Democrats.

Thanks for the clarification.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah, the definition has broadened with the Internet DDM. From wiki the font of all knowledge.

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, gaslighting involves attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim's belief.[1][2]

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term originated from the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gaslight and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations, in which the gas-fueled lights in a character's home are dimmed when he turns the attic lights brighter while he searches the attic at night. He convinces his wife that she is imagining the change. The term has been used in clinical and research literature,[3][4][b] as well as in political commentary.[5][6] [/B]

Gotcha. So not at all what I posted even a tiny bit. But what Robtard posted.

Thanks for clarifying.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You're right: it's 30% of the lefties and Democrats.

Thanks for the clarification.

Anyhow, what's the difference between a chickpea and a garbanzo bean?

Now think about this for at least a minute before revealing:

Spoiler:
I've never had a garbanzo on my face

Originally posted by Robtard
If the CIA is still interested in mind control, they should take a good look at Trumpers, they fall in line without question when Trump commands it so.

LOL@ the irony of that statement coming from someone like you who has been thoroughly brainwashed by the lying leftist MSM to think that Trump is literally the next Hitler lmao or that so-called "man-made" climate change is more of a threat to the planet than nuclear weapons lmao or that socialism is superior to capitalism or that there are 69 genders lol.

Irony overload, indeed.

Originally posted by Robtard
^Classic Cheerleading

...says the person who is always cheerleading for his butt-buddies with his little "bingos." 😂

Calm down, buddy. It's gonna give you something.

There goes that Lefty Imagination again.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Calm down, buddy. It's gonna give you something.

Except he's not wrong. Rob legit behaves in the exact same manner he dubs as "cheerleading" on a near daily basis lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
Except he's not wrong. Rob legit behaves in the exact same manner he dubs as "cheerleading" on a near daily basis lol.

It's totally ok when Rob or some other snowflake leftist does it, Surtur. Snowflakes like Grimey only have a problem with it when a Conservative does it.

Why do peeps insist on using the term 'irony overload' when they more often than not mean hypocrisy?

Originally posted by samhain
Why do peeps insist on using the term 'irony overload' when they more often than not mean hypocrisy?

It's just a thing here people(on both sides) do.

Why is "dick" a nickname for "Richard"?